home
RSS
October 29th, 2011
10:00 PM ET

The shaping of a candidate: A look at Mitt Romney's faith journey

By Jessica Ravitz, CNN

Editor’s note: This is part of an occasional series of stories looking at the faith of the leading 2012 presidential candidates, including Mitt Romney, Rick Perry and Newt Gingrich. We also profiled the faith journey of Herman Cain before he suspended his campaign.

(CNN) – A cop arrived at the roadside wreckage of a June 1968 head-on collision in southern France, took one quick look at the Citroën’s unresponsive driver and, according to one of the driver’s friends, scrawled into the young man’s American passport, “Il est mort” - “He is dead.”

The man at the Citroën’s wheel was Mitt Romney, who may have appeared dead but was very much alive – as is his bid today for the 2012 Republican presidential nomination.

Romney was serving as a missionary for The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, or the LDS Church, when tragedy struck. It was a time of turmoil both in France and in the United States. Protests against the Vietnam War raged on, as did French disdain for Americans. Robert Kennedy had recently been assassinated, as had Martin Luther King Jr. a couple months earlier. France was still reeling from a May marked by riots, student demonstrations and crippling worker strikes.

There were six people in the car Romney was driving when friends say an oncoming speeding Mercedes, driven by a Catholic priest, veered into his lane. Among the passengers was mission president Duane Anderson – Romney was serving as his assistant – and Anderson’s wife. Anderson was injured, and Leola Anderson, 57, was killed. Like her husband, she’d been a parent figure to the approximate 180 Mormon missionaries in the field - their surrogate mother away from home. Now, she was gone.

“I don’t think [Romney] went around blaming himself, but in talking about it he’d shed some tears,” remembered Dane McBride, a fellow missionary and Romney friend ever since. “It was a very heavy experience for a 21-year-old.”

The mission president left France for six weeks to bury his wife and heal. A gloom spread over the mission field. Conversions dropped along with Latter-day Saint spirits.

These young men and women, who were already deep in a trying spiritual rite of passage, had to grow up and prove themselves in new ways.

In spite of his grief and a broken arm, Romney and a missionary companion – they always work in pairs – took charge. They traveled around the country visiting the others. Romney lifted up deflated missionaries with silly made-up songs. He taught them to visualize all they could accomplish and challenged them to raise their expectations, McBride said.

Romney increased the conversion goal for the year by 40%, believing they could and would recharge. In the end they surpassed Romney’s goal of baptizing 200 new members into the church.

It wasn’t such a stretch, though, for Romney to distinguish himself. Throughout his life, he’s been rooted in a faith that – whether he talks about it or not – helped shape the man and GOP presidential frontrunner he is today.

‘An American running for president’

Romney hopes to get the nod that eluded him four years ago.

Back then, during his first bid for president, he faced opposition from candidates including Mike Huckabee, a former Baptist minister and favorite of evangelical voters who billed himself as the “Christian leader.”

Romney has faced questions about his faith since first getting into politics in 1994, when he ran for U.S. Senate in Massachusetts against Democratic stalwart Ted Kennedy, whose attack on Romney’s Mormonism failed to gain traction.

Since then Romney, who was later elected Massachusetts governor, has played down his faith on the campaign trail. But he addressed it in a December 2007 speech, hoping to stem voter concerns about his faith and how it might influence him as a president. It was a speech he likened to John F. Kennedy’s famous 1960 speech, when Kennedy was in the running to be America’s first Catholic president.

“Almost 50 years ago another candidate from Massachusetts explained that he was an American running for president, not a Catholic running for president,” Romney said. “Like him, I am an American running for president. I do not define my candidacy by my religion. A person should not be elected because of his faith nor should he be rejected because of his faith.”

He said, “No candidate should become the spokesman for his faith,” and that if he were to be elected president, he would “serve no one religion, no one group, no one cause, and no one interest.”

“A president must serve only the common cause of the people of the United States,” he said. “I believe in my Mormon faith, and I endeavor to live by it. My faith is the faith of my fathers. I will be true to them and to my beliefs. Some believe that such a confession of my faith will sink my candidacy. If they are right, so be it.”

Whether Romney’s confession of faith did sink him was a subject of debate. He hoped to deflect the focus on his religion while not speaking to doctrine or specific beliefs. In the whole speech, he only mentioned the word Mormon once.

Just days later, Huckabee would stir the pot.

“Don’t Mormons believe that Jesus and the devil are brothers?” Huckabee said to a New York Times reporter. Huckabee later apologized for the remark.

This time around, Romney remains strong in the polls and counts among his backers New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie, who endorsed Romney shortly after saying he wouldn’t join the race.

But Romney also has been distracted by pesky background noise. After introducing Texas Gov. Rick Perry at the recent Values Voter Summit, Pastor Robert Jeffress said Republicans shouldn’t vote for Romney because Mormonism is a “cult.” 

Despite such efforts to instill doubt in voters, a recent CNN/ORC International poll showed that a candidate’s Mormon faith made no difference to 80% of Americans, and that 51% believed Mormonism was a Christian religion.

Beyond condemning Jeffress’s comments and Perry’s association with the pastor, Romney’s campaign has made it adamantly clear that it doesn’t want to discuss his faith. Repeated attempts to speak with the candidate, his wife, his children, his siblings – and, really, just anyone – about Romney’s faith journey were denied by campaign headquarters. Even the reins it has on those outside the inner circle appear tight. A local LDS Church leader in Michigan, contacted in hopes of finding childhood friends, forwarded CNN’s inquiry to campaign headquarters - prompting yet another slap down.

“What makes no sense to me is how you continue to push forward in writing about Gov. Romney’s faith journey when we’ve made it clear in every way possible that this is not a story we want to participate in,” campaign spokeswoman Andrea Saul wrote in an email.

Mitt Romney -- with wife Ann to his left -- hopes to become the first Mormon U.S. president.

Without talking to him, it’s impossible to say exactly what Romney believes. But what Mormons generally believe is this:

They count themselves as Christian because they accept Jesus Christ as the son of God and believe people are saved through his atonement. They believe the Bible is the word of God, and that the Book of Mormon (subtitled “Another Testament of Jesus Christ”) is, too.

Opinion: Who says Mormons aren't Christian?

They believe The Church of Jesus Christ, which existed long ago, was restored by a prophet named Joseph Smith, who founded the LDS Church in 1830. Central to their belief system is that God still reveals truth to modern-day LDS Church prophets, as well as to individuals – Mormon or otherwise.

Explain it to me: Mormonism | Video: Mormonism defined

They attend weekly services in chapels, also referred to as “wards” or meetinghouses, while their large temples (accessible only to those deemed sufficiently faithful) are utilized for the most important and sacred ceremonies, including baptisms for the dead and celestial marriages - during which couples are “sealed” for eternity. Mormons with temple privileges wear special undergarments as a reminder of their faith, and those who are devoted abstain from alcohol, tea and coffee.

Through faith, prayer and service to others, they strive to be more like Jesus and get closer to God. Latter-day Saints place great emphasis on families, believing that through them – and not alone – people can find a place in the highest level of heavenly society.

Families, Mormons say, can be united forever.

Growing up while abroad

The 19-year-old Mitt Romney who showed up for missionary training was different than the rest.

“Mitt stood out from everyone else,” said Byron Hansen, who flew with Romney to France in July 1966. “He already spoke French pretty darn good, while the rest of us knew ‘bonjour’ and ‘au revoir.’ He immediately jumped out as a leader.”

Romney, like many of the other young men called by church leaders to serve, had finished a year of college before he got his missionary calling. But he’d gone to prestigious Stanford University and came from a privileged and powerful background.

He was worldly, not intimidated, and he was eager to interact with people of different backgrounds, said Hansen, now a car dealer in Brigham City, Utah. “All the rest of us from no-name Utah had never been more than 500 miles away from home.”

Despite the comforts he’d known growing up, Romney wasn’t spoiled. Some apartments that housed missionaries around France lacked heat and water, but had plenty of fleas. Those sorts of conditions likely made Romney appreciate all the more the luxuries of the mission home, located in the ritziest part of Paris, where he worked and lived during the latter part of his two-and-a-half year mission. He and the others there were fed by a Spanish cook and enjoyed the benefits of maids.

What’s more, said fellow missionary and friend Dane McBride, the young men learned what time of day to peer through windows to watch Brigitte Bardot walk her poodles.

The scenery aside, “it was the nicest office I ever worked in,” said McBride, now an allergist and immunologist in Roanoke, Virginia.

Throughout his mission, Romney was the first to get out of bed each morning, forever focused on his goals and the lessons he’d teach, and he stayed gung-ho even when others faltered, Hansen said.

Romney didn’t shy away from approaching anyone. On Saturdays, a free day for missionaries, he’d be done with his laundry by 9 a.m. and coaxing everyone else out the door for bike rides in the mountains, tours in new places or football games.

“He was never one to sit around,” Hansen said. “You had to run to keep up with Mitt.”

He was both pragmatic and creative when it came to sharing Mormon teachings, McBride said.

“Neither of us cared for knocking on doors much,” said McBride, referring to the typical tact for Mormon proselytizing. “But we did it. We did it a lot.”

However, Romney was a big proponent of what McBride called “creative contacting.” In lieu of going door-to-door, he preferred to encourage conversations by building sidewalk kiosks or inviting French locals to play baseball or attend evening parties with American themes – complete with Western wear and guitar strumming.

Being a missionary in largely secular France deepened Romney’s faith because it forced him to wrestle with challenges, steep himself in study and prayer and face plenty of rejection, McBride said. Like others, Romney was no stranger to doors being slammed in his face or getting his behind kicked while heading down apartment stairwells. These sorts of encounters, his friend said, help a person mature and grow.

Establishing a connection with others in the face of adversity is central to the missionary experience, and it’s a skill Romney carries with him today, McBride said.

“Mitt knows how to find common ground with people,” he said. “You learn that being a missionary. … And it’s how you get things done in politics.”

Religious roots that run deep and strong

The groundwork for Romney’s faith journey was laid long before he put on a suit and, armed with his Book of Mormon, boarded a flight for France.

He comes from a long line of Latter-day Saints. Those who like to highlight what makes him different might point to how one of his great-grandfathers fled to Mexico, about 125 years ago, amid U.S. government crackdowns on what Mormons refer to as “plural marriage.” But many multigenerational Mormon families have polygamists in their family tree.

Plural marriage was introduced by church founder Joseph Smith but was officially banned by the church in 1890. Some 38,000 people aligned with fundamentalist offshoots of the LDS Church still practice polygamy, but they are a far cry and completely separate from the 14 million worldwide members in Romney’s church.

Romney’s late father, George Romney, was from modest means. He was born in Mexico to monogamous U.S.-born parents and left during the Mexican Revolution when he was 5. He went on to be CEO and chairman of the now-defunct American Motors Corporation, governor of Michigan and a presidential candidate himself in 1968.

Mitt Romney with his father, George Romney, who made his own mark as a leader in business, the LDS Church and politics.

Growing up Mormon in Michigan made Mitt Romney a member of a distinct minority. There were fewer than 8,000 Mormons in the state in 1945, two years before he was born, according to the LDS Church. It’s been reported that he was the only Mormon in his high school. While Mormon students in Utah could simply stroll across the street from school to attend early morning seminary before the first bell, longtime friend McBride said Romney didn’t have that easy, built-in outlet to strengthen his faith amid peers.

“Neither of us had benefited from that,” said McBride, who also grew up as a Mormon minority in Iowa and North Carolina. “We had been called on in school to defend our faith many times. … I remember from fifth grade on needing to defend my religion.”

Romney’s family, though, was active in the church. In 1952, his father was named Michigan’s first stake president. A stake is comparable to a diocese and has under its umbrella multiple “wards” or congregations, much as a diocese consists of parishes.

The LDS Church does not rely on professional clergy. Instead, church members are called to serve as volunteer leaders while holding down paid jobs. Church leaders rely on other volunteers as advisers. For instance, a ward bishop has two counselors, while a stake president confers with a high council of 12.

Being Michigan’s sole stake president meant Romney’s father – in addition to his full-time corporate work – oversaw ward operations, was the spiritual guide for the Latter-day Saint community and relayed messages from church headquarters in Salt Lake City.

Like many practicing Mormons, the Romneys enjoyed “family home evening” every Monday, a time reserved to pray, study and sing together, McBride said.

Romney has spoken publicly about how his parents took him and his three siblings on mobile American history lessons, McBride said, loading up the family Rambler for cross-country tours to national parks, with stops at places like Mount Rushmore, Valley Forge and Williamsburg.

But McBride said the family also likely visited LDS historical sites, including points along the path westward traveled by Mormon pioneers who followed the call of Joseph Smith’s successor, Brigham Young, and trekked through treacherous conditions to arrive in 1847 in what is now Utah.

While Romney’s parents made sure their children were deeply connected to their country and their faith, Romney didn’t reside in a Mormon bubble. He was part of a bigger and more diverse world.

Ann Davies, the woman he fell for and now calls his wife, was Episcopalian when he met her during high school, and he knew she was the one for him.

After he left for college and then his mission, she began studying Mormonism, attended church with Romney’s parents and converted. He returned from France and proposed to her immediately. After a civil ceremony in Michigan, the two were married and “sealed” for eternity in 1969 during a sacred ceremony in the Salt Lake Temple.

The couple returned to college and began a family at church-owned Brigham Young University in Provo, Utah, before moving to Boston, where Romney earned law and business degrees at Harvard.

Serving his LDS community

Romney rose in local church leadership while making his corporate mark. Along the way he applied many of the skills he’d displayed earlier, including his knack as a young missionary for turning challenges into possibilities.

In the 1980s and early 1990s, he served as a ward bishop – or part-time pastor – and stake president for the Boston area.

Romney delivered sermons, counseled couples, and made middle-of-the-night hospital runs. He monitored budgets, weighed welfare needs of immigrants and others, and drove outreach to different faith communities. He showed up at the homes of Latter-day Saints in need of help, taking on tasks such as removing bees’ nests.

Philip Barlow, now the chair of Mormon History and Culture at Utah State University, served as a one of two counselors to Bishop Romney in the early 1980s.

Each Saturday, the counselors would meet with Romney in his home in Belmont, a suburb northwest of Boston. And while the work was serious, it didn’t mean Romney always was. Barlow recalled the time Romney busted out with a rendition of Michael Jackson’s “Billie Jean” and did a formidable moonwalk across the floor.

“The media is always reporting that he can come across as too polished,” Barlow said. “But there’s a real person there.”

Romney also was the kind of leader who built bridges with those suspicious of Mormons. When a chapel under construction in Belmont burned to the ground amid ongoing anti-Mormon sentiment, he turned the perceived arson attack into opportunity.

Non-Mormon churches offered their buildings to accommodate the needs of the displaced Latter-day Saints during the chapel’s reconstruction. While it would have been easier to pick one place to call a temporary home for services, classes and meetings, Romney accepted every viable offer he received – thereby forcing a rotation of interaction with different faith communities.

“It was an inspired move,” said Grant Bennett, who at one time served as a counselor to Romney when he was a bishop and later served on the Boston stake’s high council under Romney when he was president.

Experiencing the kindness of strangers offered relief to Mormons who had been feeling “a little under siege,” said Bennett, who first got to know Romney through church in 1978 and worked with him for five years at Bain & Company, a global consulting firm that Romney eventually led as CEO.

“In a religious context, Mormons are very good at serving each other and are often hesitant to accept help,” he said. “I think Mitt had the fundamental insight … that we’d be better off and [the other churches would] be blessed by helping us.”

It was the sort of decision perhaps born of being in the minority in Michigan and learning early to honor religious pluralism, said Bennett, now president of CPS Technologies, a high-tech manufacturing firm in the Boston area.

On the campaign trail and with media, Romney hopes to focus on matters other than faith.

In his religious roles, Romney had to delegate and call others to serve. Sometimes he believed in people more than they believed in themselves.

Andy Anderson, a retired researcher and writer in Kaysville, Utah, first got to know Romney amid tragedy. It was Anderson’s mother who was killed in the 1968 car wreck in France, and when his father returned to Paris, Anderson, his wife and children went along.

When Romney later moved to Anderson’s neighborhood in Massachusetts, Anderson said he helped Romney and his family settle in.

In 1989, Anderson said he was minding his own research business when Romney, then the Boston stake president, called him for a meeting. A group of new converts Anderson described as “Cambodian boat people” – united formally as a “branch,” which is smaller and less developed than a ward - had suddenly lost its president without warning.

In shock, he listened as Romney said, “Guess who’s the next branch president?”

Anderson said he’d been raised to accept church callings. But between the language barrier, the cultural differences, the poverty and the responsibility, this one seemed too much. He begged and pleaded with Romney. He told him he was unqualified, that he’d “never been president of anything.” He said, “It sounds like a really bad fit, Mitt.” But Romney wasn’t swayed.

“Andy, you know where this comes from,” Romney answered, referring to the Mormon belief that God can reveal truths to individuals. “It’s not me. You go talk to Him and tell me when you’re ready.”

For the next three years Anderson said he oversaw the poorest people in the Boston stake. The overwhelming task “nearly killed me,” he said. But along the way he not only fell in love with the community, he learned to believe in himself and see that he could be a leader.

“I count Mitt as a friend, and it has been a real pleasure to work under him,” he said. “If he was a real pain to work for, I’d know it. I’ve worked for people in the church I couldn’t stand.”

Women’s view of Romney

The Romney reviews from Latter-day Saint women in the Boston area were more mixed.

In the early 1970s, as the feminist movement gained steam, a group of Mormon women began gathering in Cambridge to explore the history of women in their church. They were looking for role models, stories that would inspire them.

With the help of LDS Church historians, they learned about their female ancestors and wrote a book, “Mormon Sisters: Women in Early Utah.” They discovered that a women’s newspaper, Women’s Exponent, was published in the late-19th and early-20th centuries and featured women’s writings that Judy Dushku described as “very feminist in their views.”

“We were reading about women we’d never heard of before,” said Dushku, a Suffolk University professor of government with an interest in gender. She and other “founding mothers” were moved to start a new publication, now a quarterly magazine: Exponent II.

That decision, however, was not received well by the LDS Church, Dushku said. She said the fact that it was independent and had no stamp of approval from church higher-ups, all of them men, rubbed some - including Romney - the wrong way.

Dushku said Romney encouraged friends to tell their wives not to participate. He made it clear he didn’t want the women behind the publication holding meetings on church property. Dushku and the others suspected it was under his direction that copies of the magazine displayed in congregations got dumped in wastebaskets.

The LDS Church is patriarchal in nature. Only men can serve as bishops, stake presidents and in higher leadership roles, including the combined post of church president and prophet. Only men are welcome in the priesthood, which in Mormon circles means having the authority, for example, to perform baptisms and offer sacramental blessings.

Dushku decided she could live with this and remains a faithful Mormon.  She said she and the others simply wanted an outlet for women to discuss issues unique to them. And while what they created may have seemed “radical” back then, she says there are Mormon women bloggers today who push boundaries much more than Exponent II ever did.

What got to Dushku about Romney was less his reaction to the magazine and more how she saw him treat women he was in a position to comfort and support as a local church leader.

Dushku has told the story of a woman, a mother of four, who was pressured by then-Bishop Romney to go forward with a pregnancy despite advice from doctors that a medical complication made it too dangerous.

She also recalled the story of a meeting between Romney and a woman whose ex-husband had been excommunicated from the church because of numerous affairs he’d had while serving as a bishop.

The woman asked Dushku to accompany her to the meeting, where Romney encouraged the woman to forgive her philandering ex so he could be re-baptized into the church and marry another woman.

The problem, Dushku said, is that the husband had never bothered to apologize to the wife he’d hurt, a fact she said Romney didn’t seem to care much about.

Since speaking out to media recently, Dushku said she’s been flooded with responses from Facebook friends. Most of the reactions are positive, thanking her for her courage.

But some friends have suggested she back off.

“How can you blame someone who has so many responsibilities?” one friend wrote. “He was young,” said another. “People change.”

Dushku said she affords Romney the possibility he may have changed, that he might handle such situations differently today.

“But compassion is a character quality,” she said. “I doubt he’s much different now.”

Her take on Romney, though, doesn’t jibe with that of Helen Claire Sievers, executive director of Harvard’s WorldTeach program, which brings volunteer teachers to developing countries.

Sievers, who’s been involved with Exponent II on and off since its inception, was the Boston stake activity director when Romney was stake president. She recalled being at a meeting in Dushku’s house in Watertown, outside of Boston, when women began wondering aloud about how their local church might better empower women.

“Often leadership in the Mormon church tends to pull far to the right, to out-orthodox the orthodox,” said Sievers, who later proposed to Romney that he should meet with the Boston LDS women to hear their frustrations and suggestions. Romney was willing to have such a meeting, even though it bucked the comfort level of church headquarters.

“I was really impressed that Mitt felt strongly that even if he could get in trouble with the hierarchy, he really wanted to hear what the women that were under his stewardship had to say so that they would feel as comfortable as possible in church,” Sievers said.

As a result of the meeting, which drew more than 150 participants, Sievers said adjustments were made, including allowing women to say opening prayers at church meetings. Romney didn’t have the power to change church doctrine, but Sievers said he could and did bend the norm to make women feel heard and more respected.

“Many Mormon men wouldn’t make that choice,” she said.

Serving outside the stake and ward

In his fulltime work life, Romney showed that his commitment to serving others extended beyond those in his ward or stake. His religious values came through in business decisions – sometimes trumping opportunities for financial gain.

Robert Gay, who was once a managing partner at Bain Capital, the venture capital firm Romney founded, recalled how Romney refused to put investment dollars into a deal with Artisan Entertainment because he didn’t want to profit from R-rated films.

But of greater note to Gay - who once served on the Boston stake’s high council with Romney - was something Romney did for him in 1996.

After Gay’s 14-year-old daughter went missing for three days in New York, Romney shut down Bain Capital in Boston and flew about 50 employees to New York to help find her.

The girl, who lived with her family in Connecticut, disappeared after going to a concert in Manhattan. Romney and the other Bain Capital executives put their “$1 billion investment firm” on hold, created a “war room” at a hotel, paid to print 200,000 fliers, set up a toll free hotline number and enlisted the help of a private investigator, the Boston Globe reported at the time.

They canvassed streets and talked to runaways. The girl was found in a New Jersey home, “dazed from a disorienting dose of a drug,” the Globe reported.

It’s not a story Gay likes to retell, though he did record a video testimonial about it during Romney’s 2008 presidential bid. Today, Gay would rather offer other insights, including the time another Bain Capital partner suddenly fell very ill and was hospitalized. Romney was the first person to show up for a visit at Massachusetts General Hospital.

Gay now lives in West Palm Beach, Florida, and manages an equity fund with Jon Huntsman Sr., father of another GOP Mormon presidential hopeful. Gay called Romney “a devout Christian,” someone who has always been committed to “leading a good and purposeful life.”

What faith means for future

Romney, like the other prospective candidates for president, will remain under the microscope in the months ahead.

His past will be combed, his policies scrutinized, his record examined.

How much his Mormon faith plays into his political journey remains to be seen. But whether he likes it, whether his campaign can control it, the fact that he may be on track to become the first Mormon president in U.S. history will garner attention.

It’s a reality that Romney friends like McBride acknowledge, even if it disappoints them.

“The issues of his church are not the issues of this country. Those are personal issues,” he said. “I hate to see further articles [about his faith], but, on the other hand, what do you do?”

- CNN Writer/Producer

Filed under: Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints • Mitt Romney • Mormonism • Politics

soundoff (2,731 Responses)
  1. Colin

    There are some pretty fundamental objections I have to not just Mormonism, but all Christianity that are hard to get around. Now before some believer rants back at me that I am evil, an "angry atheist", or am going to burn for all eternity in hell, please take the time to actually read and cogitate the objections.

    If you have an objection to what I say – great, post it. If you only object to the fact that I said it or do not share your belief – don’t waste your breath, I feel no duty to be quit about this.

    1. At its most fundamental level, Christianity requires a belief that an all-knowing, all-powerful, immortal being created the entire Universe and its billions of galaxies 13,700,000,000 years ago (the age of the Universe) sat back and waited 10,000,000,000 years for the Earth to form, then waited another 3,700,000,000 years for h.omo sapiens to gradually evolve, then, at some point gave them eternal life and sent its son to Earth to talk about sheep and goats in the Middle East.

    While here, this divine visitor exhibits no knowledge of ANYTHING outside of the Iron Age Middle East, including the other continents, 99% of the human race, and the aforementioned galaxies.

    Either that, or it all started 6,000 years ago with one man, one woman and a talking snake. Either way “oh come on” just doesn’t quite capture it.

    2. This “all loving’ god spends his time running the Universe and spying on the approximately 7 billion human beings on planet Earth 24 hours a day, seven days a week. He even reads their minds (or “hears their prayers”, if you see any difference) using some kind of magic telepathic powers, so as to know if they think bad thoughts, so he knows whether to reward or punish them after they die.

    3. The above beliefs are based on nothing more than a collection of Bronze and Iron Age Middle Eastern mythology, much of it discredited, that was cobbled together into a book called the “Bible” by people we know virtually nothing about, before the Dark Ages.

    4. A rejection of the supernatural elements of Christianity does not require a rejection of its morality. Most atheists and secular humanists share a large amount of the morality taught today by mainstream Christianity. To the extent we reject Christian morality, it is where it is outdated or mean spirited – such as in the way it seeks to curtail freedoms or oppose the rights of $exual minorities. In most other respects, our basic moral outlook is indistinguishable from that of the liberal Christian – we just don’t need the mother of all carrots and sticks hanging over our head in order to act in a manner that we consider moral.

    Falsely linking morality to a belief in the supernatural is a time-tested “three card trick” religion uses to stop its adherents from asking the hard questions. So is telling them it is “wrong to doubt.” This is probably why there is not one passage in the Bible in support of intelligence and healthy skepticism, but literally hundreds in support of blind acceptance and blatant gullibility.

    5. We have no idea of who wrote the four Gospels, how credible or trustworthy they were, what ulterior motives they had (other than to promote their religion) or what they based their views on. We know that the traditional story of it being Matthew, Mark, Luke and John is almost certainly wrong. For example, the Gospel of Matthew includes a scene in which Jesus meets Matthew, recounted entirely in the third person!! Nevertheless, we are called upon to accept the most extraordinary claims by these unknown people, who wrote between 35 to 65 years after Christ died. It is like taking the word of an unknown Branch Davidian about what happened to David Koresh at Waco – 35 years after the fact.

    6. When backed into a corner, Christianity admits it requires a “leap of faith” to believe it. However, once one accepts that pure faith is a legitimate reason to believe in something, which it most certainly is not, one has to accept all other gods based on exactly the same reasoning. One cannot be a Christian based on the “leap of faith” – and then turn around and say those who believe in, for example, the Hindu gods, based on the same leap, got it wrong. Geography and birthplace dictates what god(s) one believes in. Every culture that has ever existed has had its own gods and they all seem to favor that particular culture, its hopes, dreams, and prejudices? Do you think they all exist? If not, why only yours?

    Faith is not belief in a god. It is a mere hope for a god, a wish for a god, no more universal than the language you speak or the baseball team you support.

    7. The Bible is literally infested with contradictions, outdated morality, and open support for the most barbarous acts of cruelty – including, genocide, murder, slavery, ra.pe and the complete subjugation of women. All of this is due to when and where it was written, the morality of the times and the motives of its authors and compilers. While this may be exculpatory from a literary point of view, it also screams out the fact that it is a pure product of man, bereft of any divine inspiration.

    8. Having withheld any evidence of his existence, this god will then punish those who doubt him with an eternity burning in hell. I don’t have to kill, I don’t have to steal, I don’t even have to litter. All I have to do is honestly not believe in the Christian god and he will inflict a grotesque penalty on me a billion times worse than the death penalty – and he loves me.

    I remain totally amazed that this stuff made it into the 21st Century.

    October 30, 2011 at 9:37 am |
    • danny allen

      How about your feelings on Islam? Atheist always seem to leave that out or some reason.

      October 30, 2011 at 9:48 am |
    • Colin

      Danny, all of the above objections, with slight modifications, would apply to Islam, too.

      October 30, 2011 at 9:50 am |
    • Saturn

      I grew up Christian, and even back when I was a believer I still always thought there was something just a little bit too contrived about believing in a God who can break the laws of physics at will. I mean, you can explain pretty much anything with it. When I was about 15 or so, I asked my pastor how it is that we are able to perceive the existence of celestial objects which are over a million light years away, if our earth is less than 10,000 years old. By the laws of physics, we shouldn't be able to see those objects at all.

      His answer was that God had the ability to create the appearance of an old earth, even though it was young, which included placing all the photons from those distant celestial objects very near to earth so that we can see them, and also included planting fossils in the earth which appear to be millions of years old.

      So then I asked him, why would God do that? It seems like he's deliberately misleading people into believing something that isn't true. Why would he do such a thing?

      His answer: so that we will have to believe by faith, rather than by evidence.

      Well, that's an awfully convenient answer. Christians have an answer for everything.

      October 30, 2011 at 9:55 am |
    • Kate

      I love your reply and agree with all you say, I find it sad that we are are non believers, who respect the believers are forced to stomach this drivel. I would love a president who stands by the separation of church and state... there are so many issues in this country and we have to have constant and consistent fundamental christian drivel forced on me a non believer always makes me sad.

      October 30, 2011 at 9:57 am |
    • ConnieS

      Well stated. Agree 100%.

      October 30, 2011 at 10:05 am |
    • Randy

      Sad...you really have no clue.

      October 30, 2011 at 10:09 am |
    • Gethetruth

      I couldn't have written it any better. Your the man ! If the World were filled with people like you and me, the world would be a better place. Its now filled with stupid people.

      October 30, 2011 at 10:29 am |
    • JoeS

      You completely don't understand the very working of God. Even the animals felt that there is a creator of the Universe. Since it would take time to enumerate to you all the mysteries of creation, time, history, Physics, love, Family, language, evil, the role of satan, righteousness, black and white, good and evil, Priesthood, government, Hitler, Stalin, Satan, and all the varieties of the Universe, the only thing I could suggest is for you to read the Book of Mormon and ASK GOD if its true. And the Holy Spirit of God will manifest it to you. Please do it......

      October 31, 2011 at 2:12 pm |
  2. J Mann

    Mormons may believe some wacky stuff, but they are solid citizens with good values, in my experience. What they believe is unbelievable, but then so is modern American Christianity, which has no problem with war, hatred and prejudice.

    October 30, 2011 at 9:33 am |
  3. Zamiel

    It might be nice to have a President that doesn't believe in ANY gods, angels, or demons for once. You know... See how that works out for a change?

    October 30, 2011 at 9:32 am |
    • J Mann

      Amen.

      October 30, 2011 at 9:34 am |
    • Saturn

      in before christians bringing up hitler, stalin, pol pot, etc etc etc.

      October 30, 2011 at 9:36 am |
    • JT

      Yes, they keep tossing out the democratically elected darling of the Catholic church Hitler as one of their own for some reason.

      October 30, 2011 at 9:41 am |
    • john

      I refuse to vote for these religious nuts......mormons are even weirder......koo koos

      October 30, 2011 at 9:52 am |
    • Kate

      Amen. Please.

      October 30, 2011 at 10:02 am |
  4. olcranky

    anyone else think it's odd that, in describing the incident with Romney and the woman whose doctors told her she should terminate her pregnancy because it was likely to kill her, CNN left out the most important aspect of the story? LDS leadership (higher than local bishops) granted this woman permission to terminate her pregnancy based on the medical evidence and Romney showed up at the hospital just prior to the procedure to harass her for having the audacity to try to save her own life instead of dying during the pregnancy:http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=romney%20bishop%20woman%20terminate%20to%20save%20her%20life&source=web&cd=3&ved=0CCoQFjAC&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjezebel.com%2F5851050%2Fthe-curious-case-of-mitt-romney-an-abortion-and-eliza-dushkus-mom&ei=bVCtToucDoXs0gHOz4WSDw&usg=AFQjCNEjGpKySSj-QHvOjxegkIc44j-sKQ (depending on how far along when she would have died, it's also likely the baby wouldn't have survived either).

    I don't care what a candidate's religion or religious beliefs are provided they do not impose those beliefs on others via government. In Romney's case, he is running on a social conservative platform (Christian fundamentalist conservative platform) so it is appropriate to question his religious beliefs and how he will separate them from legislation/government responsibilities. That being said, I think it's hysterical how the "christian" right rips each other's denominations apart

    October 30, 2011 at 9:32 am |
    • Billy

      Without knowing what was actually happening in medical terminology and how far along she was it is impossible to say whether she actually needed an abortion. At first glance I'd say it was likely BS, and she did not really need one. Don't worry though mitt flip-flops on this issue.

      October 30, 2011 at 9:46 am |
  5. MAX

    after obama goes to the reverend wrights church for decades cnn has the nerve to question mormons or any other faith how pathetic and news seeking can you people get..ABO ANYBODY BUT OBAMA IN 2012

    October 30, 2011 at 9:30 am |
    • TruthPrevails

      Obama is the best thing to happen to the states. He is not the main reason for the issues facing the country, he was handed a world of problems from a Bush run country and is doing his best to resolve them under such tenuous circ.umstances. He got the man who Bush couldn't get. He tries things his way and the republicans disagree so he tries to meet them halfway and they still disagree and then when he does agree with them, they still disagree. This man can't win for losing. It's the republicans that need to go not Obama.

      October 30, 2011 at 10:30 am |
  6. Jilli

    I have a hard time buying Mitt's religious convictions – in fact, I have a hard time seeing any conviction in Mitt Romney. He appears to have no real principles or convictions – no spine. He'll say anything to win. That's not admirable at all.

    October 30, 2011 at 9:30 am |
    • Eric G

      Well said.

      October 30, 2011 at 9:43 am |
  7. Sarah

    Let us keep that seperation of Church and State Strong!!!! Keep Freedom in this country, protect everyone's rights!

    October 30, 2011 at 9:29 am |
  8. twiddly

    Mormonism teaches that we can become gods, and rule over our own planets.

    Of course, this is only for a privileged few, like... Mitt Romney of course.

    October 30, 2011 at 9:24 am |
    • twiddly

      I also should mention that only the men (naturally) can rule the planet.
      The women are eternally pregnant, pushing out spirit children that eventually take physical form and populate the planet.

      Do some research. Mormonism is _so_ bizarre.

      October 30, 2011 at 9:32 am |
  9. Colin

    The belief that an infitely old, all-knowing sky-god, powerful enough to create the entire Universe and its billions of galaxies, will cause people to survive their own phsical deaths and live happily ever after in heaven, if they follow some random laws laid down in Bronze Age Palestine = Judaism.

    Judaism + a belief that the same god impregnated a virgin with himself to give birth to himself, so he could sacrifice himself to himself to negate a rule he himself made = Christianity.

    Christianity + a belief that aliens from other planets mated with humans who will one day be gods with their own planets, that Jesus and Satan were brothers, that an angel gave the secrets of the Universe to a failed conman and treasure hunter from upstate New York, that the Israelis colonized America and that magic underwear will protect you = mormonism.

    I sometimes wonder if we really are advancing as a species or just layering our silly fables and superst.itions.

    October 30, 2011 at 9:20 am |
    • Saturn

      oh it's you, colin, we meet again.

      trolling the belief blog never gets old, right?

      October 30, 2011 at 9:24 am |
    • Marco

      Well said, and good question.

      October 30, 2011 at 9:27 am |
  10. Justin Edward

    Hey CNN, I love the long well written article, now how about you provide the same coverage to the rest of the GOP candidates instead of being shills for Romney.

    October 30, 2011 at 9:20 am |
    • twiddly

      You think this will _help_ Romney? Too funny. Once people see what mormonism is all about (becoming a god your self, if you're a man that is, and ruling a planet, etc.) he stands no chance.

      There is not so much difference between catholics and protestants, mostly the pope. Mormons on the other hand are probably closer to scientology.

      October 30, 2011 at 9:29 am |
    • JT

      Hey dufus, how 'bout you actually read the article where it says in the frist few sentences that this is a series where all candidates will get their own story.

      October 30, 2011 at 9:32 am |
  11. Richard in Texas

    It doesn't matter what a candidates brick-and-mortar church, temple, synagogue, or whatever is. The ancient Celts, Egyptians, Greeks, and Romans (polytheists) understood the importance of morals and cohesiveness in society. There is only one high priority issue in 2011/2012: Who has the best experience and system concepts for heading off America from economic detonation?

    October 30, 2011 at 9:19 am |
  12. Marco

    "Mitt the Merciless" As Governor he didn't grant a single pardon. I'm not talking about murderers and rapists, but rather, teenage joyriders who'd changed their lives, stayed out of trouble, went on to school and wanted to hold a license to be an EMT, pilot, or serve others through certification. "The Merciless" will surprise millions when he extends his reach.

    October 30, 2011 at 9:19 am |
  13. John

    [youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0dz59JANSdg&w=640&h=390]
    `

    October 30, 2011 at 9:18 am |
  14. lastofall

    Sorry, but those who are secular cannot comprehend heavenly matter´s, though they suppose that they can; they cannot, it is hid from them. Therefore to address Mormonism from a secular perspective in relation to Christianity is as one speaking into the air, it is meaningless, nothingness, namely vanity. Just be glad as a worldly sort, that he also is worldly, therefore you may better depend on him to be as you, as those that live by secular principles and practices rather than by heavenly principles and practices. Be of good comfort, he is on your side.

    October 30, 2011 at 9:17 am |
    • twiddly

      Yes, you must be willfully ignorant to understand what are clearly ridiculous and unsubstantiated beliefs!

      In other words, if a person doesn't believe in the tooth fairy (or, something equally silly) then they can't possibly understand why/how I believe in magical, invisible beings that put voices in my head.

      October 30, 2011 at 9:22 am |
    • Saturn

      The understanding of "heavenly matters" is hid from us? What's that supposed to mean? Hid by whom? By God?

      Don't you think it would help his cause if he would stop hiding that understanding from us? I mean, I'm not omniscient or anything, but it seems to me that it wouldn't be very constructive to make a large portion of the population incapable of understanding "heavenly matters." Seems like a bit of an oversight on his part, really. Almost like a... like a mistake.

      October 30, 2011 at 9:31 am |
    • atheismisthetruth

      @lasttofall – No one can comprehend heavenly matters because they do not exist for any of us to comprehend. If you are claiming supernatural knowledge then you are one of two things, dishonest or delusional.

      Judging by the odd phrasing of your post I would vote delusional.

      October 30, 2011 at 10:03 am |
    • Kate

      Hmm, HE is.. how come you otherworldly sorts always make your superntural deity a GUY.. I am waiting for a christian sect to come out for Jesus as woman.. or Joseph Smith was really a chick.. i just love that Dad as god crap. If I ever wanted to believe, the superior 'male' god always sends me back to the lite of science and true humanity.. no god thank you.

      October 30, 2011 at 10:24 am |
  15. kenhp1

    The story shows him to be a good man. We need more of them. However, it does not mean he would be a good President. And I do not believe he would be. I was looking for a good viable Republican nominee. There are certainly none on this run for 2012. Oh, maybe next time. Herman Caine is an idiot. Romney is a flip flop. Newt does not show initiative.
    I guess Obama will take the election.
    Bush actually gave a speech in Oct. of 2008 that it could take years for the economy to recover, and it could be worse than the great depression. It was the only truth he ever told.....

    October 30, 2011 at 9:15 am |
    • Kate

      Agreed, he is a good man, a man who grew up rich, just because he went to France and gave a year or two doesn't make him a man of the 'people' but I will give you he's a good 'christian' man.. I personally believe he's just more of the usual fundamental, christian believers who want to take away a woman's right to chose, get into a woman's body and tell her what to do.. just another alpha male wanting to procreate his thoughts, and beliefs, if all the candidates were required to keep religion quiet, to never mention religion.. to be open, fair and honest and caring of all people's beliefs and non beliefs, I might be open to that guy/gal.. but as usual, it's a dream.

      October 30, 2011 at 10:28 am |
  16. TheRealJesus

    I remember another Mitt Romney road trip story - the one where he strapped his family dog to the roof of his car. Is someone who isn't capable of understanding why that's wrong fit to be president?

    October 30, 2011 at 9:14 am |
  17. Steve

    LDS – LSD very close acronyms but you take each to enter a world like none other. In the after life you get your own planet including your women. Ohh women do not get a planet, they can't. We know this because of a dead ghost Indian said the Jewish people were on the American continent in 400BC. Oh and they are a little paranoid only a select few have access to the top brass meetings. “While the sisters have not been given the Priesthood, . . . that does not mean that the Lord has not given unto them authority." Just us Men have taken upon ourselves to be the leaders. I believe this organization has and does great things for society and it's charity have helped many. It has brought focus to a group but based on a belief system that only a select few have access and can only be determined by a select few if you have reached "prophet level". My question is what are they hiding in these members only meetings? Why is not open?

    October 30, 2011 at 9:10 am |
  18. jnab

    I guess he'll be the Christian right's new antichrist.

    October 30, 2011 at 9:07 am |
  19. Lisa Smith

    The article forgot to mention that all mormons have to give 10% of (all) earnings to the church. If not, you can't go to the temple to receive the "special" prayer/blessing!

    October 30, 2011 at 9:05 am |
  20. ASMason

    I wonder if anyone has check to see how many Mormons were in Romney's administration in Michigan when he was governor.
    People who say Romney's religion doesn't matter should be worried. The LDS Church has so much money and influence, especially in Utah, that the legislature in Utah doesn't make any decisions unless it gets a blessing from the Mormon church. Just check out the news about the liquor commission in Utah. It holds secret meeting to get approval with those in power in the church. Check out Wyoming and see just how much property the LDS Church has acquired. If Romney wins, the country will have to get approval from the mormon church for all decisions. Having lived in Utah for 30 years you see everyone from teachers, to bankers, to police officers, to Doctors who favor mormons and this is what will happen to our country if Mitt Romney gets in. They are sneaky, they hide everything under the blanket and you should be worried if he gets in.

    October 30, 2011 at 9:01 am |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51
Advertisement
About this blog

The CNN Belief Blog covers the faith angles of the day's biggest stories, from breaking news to politics to entertainment, fostering a global conversation about the role of religion and belief in readers' lives. It's edited by CNN's Daniel Burke with contributions from Eric Marrapodi and CNN's worldwide news gathering team.