home
RSS
Newt Gingrich’s faith journey: How a thrice-married Catholic became an evangelical darling
Newt Gingrich has spent time as a Lutheran, a Baptist and a Roman Catholic.
December 10th, 2011
10:00 PM ET

Newt Gingrich’s faith journey: How a thrice-married Catholic became an evangelical darling

By Dan Gilgoff, CNN.com Religion Editor

Editor’s note: This is part of an occasional series of stories looking at the faith of the leading 2012 presidential candidates, including Mitt Romney, Rick Perry and Newt Gingrich. We also profiled the faith journey of Herman Cain before he suspended his campaign.

(CNN) - There’s an e-mail war raging among some of the nation’s leading evangelicals over whether Newt Gingrich has repented enough for his sins to be president.

One recent skirmish was set off by an open letter urging Gingrich to give a major speech confronting his perceived moral stumbles, including an affair with his third wife, Callista, while married to No. 2.

“You need to make it as clear as you possibly can that you deeply regret your past actions and that you do understand the anguish and suffering they caused others, including your former spouses,” Richard Land, public policy chief for the Southern Baptist Convention, wrote.

Land urged Gingrich to make a public promise “that there will be no moral scandals in a Gingrich White House.”

Rather than galvanizing the faithful, however, Land’s letter provoked an outcry from a handful of evangelical leaders who argued Gingrich has repented enough and deserves forgiveness.

On an e-mail thread among conservative Christian heavyweights, Jerry Falwell Jr. invoked the biblical story of a woman of ill repute who met Jesus at a well. Though the woman had been married five times, Jesus forgave her.

“The woman at the well was fortunate she encountered Jesus that day instead of some of our evangelical brethren,” the Liberty University president wrote, in an apparent swipe at Land.

On the same e-mail chain, which CNN obtained from a conservative activist, prominent Atlanta preacher Richard Lee said the nation’s evangelicals needed to support Gingrich.

Lee called Gingrich “the only forceful Christian candidate who can at this point be elected and cleanse the White House next November.”

The evangelical tussling over Gingrich says a lot about the fractured state of the Republican Party less than a month before the Iowa caucuses officially usher in the 2012 race for the White House.

The sight of influential evangelicals rallying around Gingrich, a Catholic with serious “values” baggage, speaks to the huge political vulnerability of Mitt Romney, who was the perceived GOP front-runner until recent polls put Gingrich at the front of the pack.

Gingrich speaking at the April 2011 National Catholic Prayer Breakfast in D.C.

Whether because of Romney’s past liberalism on gay rights and abortion or because of his Mormon faith, many of the evangelical Christians who make up the Republican base just don’t like him.

They’ve been looking for an alternative, by turns telling pollsters of their support for Michele Bachmann, then Rick Perry, then Herman Cain. One by one, they’ve dropped in the polls, or out of the race altogether. Now it’s Gingrich’s turn in the spotlight.

But the argument over Gingrich’s personal life also raises fundamental questions about the candidate himself and his readiness for the nation’s highest office.

Just how much has Gingrich changed since his days as a volatile and philandering House speaker? Does he have the character to be president? And, at least for many of the evangelical voters who will dominate the early primaries: Is he a true believer?

Faith by geography

Gingrich has identified with different branches of Christianity that mirror his surroundings at different stages of life.

Born near Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, an area settled by the largely Lutheran Pennsylvania Dutch, Gingrich was the son of a Lutheran mom and a Pennsylvania Dutch stepfather who adopted him.

Attending college at Atlanta’s Emory University and grad school at Tulane University in New Orleans, Gingrich became a Southern Baptist.

And as a creature of Washington, where Gingrich’s wife sings in a Catholic choir and where many prominent conservative Republicans have converted to Catholicism in the last decade, Gingrich joined the Catholic fold in 2009.

“I think that was all part of his pilgrimage,” says Ike Reighard, who was Gingrich’s pastor in Atlanta for nearly 20 years. “Whatever is the dominant religion in the region he was in, that was his progression... He was always super inquisitive, searching for deeper meaning.”

Gingrich’s stepdad was an army officer, making for a peripatetic family life that included stretches spent at military bases in Europe and at Fort Benning, Georgia, situated in the heart of the Bible Belt.

Gingrich, who declined interview requests for this story, was raised largely by his maternal grandmother, a devout Lutheran who, he has said, “taught me my most basic lessons about God and Satan.”

But Gingrich left his childhood denomination through an immersion baptism at the Saint Charles Avenue Baptist Church in New Orleans while at Tulane, where he was pursuing a Ph.D. in European history.

In a pattern that would last a lifetime, studying religion’s role in history and politics moved Gingrich to deepen his own faith.

Saint Charles Avenue’s pastor, G. Avery Lee, said Gingrich wasn’t a member of any church when the two first met.

“He said that in his study of political theory, he noted how much influence the church had had … and asked if I could explain,” Lee wrote in a 1994 letter to the New Orleans Times-Picayune, describing his first encounter with Gingrich.

Lee and Gingrich grew close, with the pastor eventually baptizing Gingrich even though his church took “a liberal approach to both theology and sociology.”

“It has been suggested by some that in baptizing him, I didn't hold him under long enough,” Wrote Lee, who died in 2009, in apparent reference to Gingrich’s conservative politics.

But Gingrich was more liberal back then, including on questions of separation of church and state.

“As a college student at Emory when the Supreme Court ruled that prayer was unconstitutional … I didn't notice it,” he said in a 2009 interview. “As a graduate student at Tulane I probably would have said it's a good decision.”

‘I don’t think his faith was the driving force’

After Tulane, Gingrich took a job as a history professor outside Atlanta and almost immediately began running for Congress, losing two races in the mid-’70s.

Around that time he joined New Hope Baptist Church, a 100-year old congregation south of Atlanta where Ike Reighard had recently arrived as the senior pastor.

“He had just lost for the second time and he came in and said, ‘I need your help,’” says Reighard. “I said, ‘What did you want to do in politics?’ He said he wanted to be speaker of the House.”

Gingrich won his next race for Congress in 1978. That year also marked the birth of the modern Christian Right.

The movement started in opposition to an Internal Revenue Service campaign under then-President Jimmy Carter to crack down on private schools resisting court-ordered desegregation.

Word of the campaign provoked fear and outrage among evangelical schools. Jerry Falwell joined the successful effort to thwart the IRS initiative and founded the Moral Majority the following year, in 1979. The group’s focus on fighting abortion and gay rights set the Christian Right agenda for decades to come.

Gingrich, for his part, was not considered part of the new wave of proud Christian Right warriors in Congress, some of whom were swept into power in 1980 on President Ronald Reagan’s coattails and enthusiastically blended their religious faith and politics.

For Gingrich, “I don’t think faith was the driving force,” says Reighard. “He realized that you have to look at issues and they can’t always be driven by your personal views and your religious values.”

“I heard a lot of times that people say evangelicals are one-issue people, all about abortion,” Reighard says. “But that’s not true with Gingrich. Education was important for him. Health care was important. The economy was important.”

Indeed, when Gingrich launched the Conservative Opportunity Society, an influential House caucus, in 1983, he focused on fiscal issues and practical electoral politics.

And yet Gingrich was an early ally of the budding Christian Right, even if he wasn’t a card-carrying member.

Ralph Reed, who would go on to lead the Christian Coalition, remembers watching as a libertarian activist advocating for gay rights and abortion rights challenged Gingrich at an early 1980s College Republicans breakfast.

“Newt pushed back hard,” Reed remembers. “It was clearly a position of intellectual conviction. I wasn’t yet a committed Christian and I remember finding that pretty remarkable, that Newt didn’t try to pacify this guy. He said, ‘No, you’re wrong.’”

Gingrich speaking at a 1987 news conference.

The future House speaker also stayed active at New Hope Baptist Church, which was quickly growing from sleepy country congregation to suburban Atlanta megachurch, even as he spent most of his time in Washington. When Reighard’s wife died during childbirth, Gingrich was on the phone with him while the pastor was still at the hospital.

“He was always there on Sunday mornings,” says Reighard, recalling Gingrich’s House years. “And the other thing he was always great at doing was town-hall-type meetings and potluck dinners. He was a grassroots person. There’s no telling how many of those meals I prayed at.”

Christian coalitions

But a lot of those town halls were more political than religious. Televangelist Pat Robertson launched the Christian Coalition in the early 1990s, and the group organized events around Georgia aimed at getting conservative evangelicals more involved in elections.

Gingrich, who counted himself an evangelical, expressed keen interest in the coalition’s work. But he seemed to be operating less as a pious Christian, and more as a strategist looking for ways the GOP could win the House of Representatives.

“We didn’t get into theological conversations that much,” says Patrick Gartland, executive director of the Georgia Christian Coalition in the early 1990s. “I was a grassroots numbers person. I loved the intricacies of grassroots, and he did, too, and he understood it.”

Unlike the Moral Majority in the 1980s, which was made up of pastors like Falwell, the Christian Coalition sought to mainstream the Christian Right by bringing in laypeople. The group’s local chapters were led by Christian business leaders, teachers and retirees, as opposed to pastors.

And Christian Coalition envisioned a big-tent religious conservatism that was as much about lowering taxes as it was about banning abortion.

For the broad-minded Gingrich, that vision was a perfect fit – especially after the Christian Coalition helped usher in the 1994 Republican Revolution, which put the House in GOP hands for the first time in 40 years.

The takeover catapulted Gingrich to speaker of the House, making him the country’s most powerful Republican. He vowed to pay attention to conservative Christians from his first day on the job, seeking to assuage evangelical activists who felt ignored by the Reagan administration after they’d worked hard for Reagan’s political campaigns.

“There was this dissatisfaction among evangelical leaders about [Reagan], and Newt said to me, ‘I’m not going to let that happen.’”

Best remembered for working with President Bill Clinton on fiscally focused deals like welfare reform and balancing the budget - and fiscal fights that led to a government shutdown - Gingrich also checked off major items on religious conservatives’ wish lists.

He brought a proposed constitutional amendment to allow school prayer up for a House vote. He presided over the adoption of the Partial Birth Abortion Ban Act – the first abortion restriction since Roe v. Wade – and the Defense of Marriage Act, which forbids the federal government from recognizing gay marriage.

Speaker-elect Gingrich with then-wife Marianne and his mother Kathleen at a January 1995 Washington church service.

Yet some evangelical leaders who knew Gingrich fretted over his personal life. The hard-charging speaker displayed braggadocio and rough edges even to political allies and didn’t talk much about his own faith.

“There were a lot of conservative Christian leaders who really loved Newt but felt like he hadn’t really turned his life over to God,” says Reed.

Many of those leaders went nuclear over rumors about Gingrich’s 1998 affair with a young House aide named Callista Bisek, while he was married to his second wife, Marianne.

Theose rumors “would break my heart,” says Reighard, who counseled Gingrich and Marianne in the 1990s. “I always believed that Newt could be one of the great leaders in our country, an American version of Winston Churchill.”

Reborn a Catholic

More than a decade later, Gingrich is back in many evangelicals’ good graces, with polls showing him way out in front of Romney among evangelicals in Iowa, who accounted for 60% of caucus-goers four years ago.

What explains the turnaround?

One big factor is Gingrich’s self-described faith awakening since leaving Congress in 1998. A personal turning point was 2002, when a court ruling struck down the recitation of the Pledge of Allegiance in public schools because of its “Under God” clause.

“That was the last straw,” Gingrich said in a 2009 interview with U.S. News & World Report. “And I said it’s time to challenge head-on secular domination in the West.”

Just as studying political history had led a 20-something Gingrich to the Saint Charles Avenue Baptist Church in New Orleans, political developments like the Pledge ruling and other perceived attacks on religion sparked a round of soul-searching.

Though it was later struck down by the Supreme Court, the ruling led Gingrich to publish “Rediscovering God in America,” a faith-based walking tour of Washington’s key buildings and monuments.

For those close to him, the 2006 book reflected what Gingrich had been preaching for more than a decade: that religion played a key role in the nation’s founding.

“In the ’90s, he talked about this idea that power comes from God to the individual and is loaned to the state,” says Rick Tyler, Gingrich’s former spokesman. “Before that, the European model was that power came from God to the king, and [Gingrich] used to explain why that was corrupt and how Thomas Jefferson turned it on his head.”

By increasing his public attack on the secular “media-academic-legal elite” and promoting his God-infused take on American history, Gingrich was branded a culture warrior during the last decade, gaining appeal among conservative evangelicals.

Gingrich continued the courtship by regularly appearing before audiences of hundreds of evangelical pastors to talk about God, history and politics.

Gingrich delivers the Liberty University commencement address in 2007 following Jerry Falwell

“There’s no question there’s been an evolution in his thinking and speaking and writing on America’s religious heritage, which has become a much bigger part of his lexicon,” says Reed, who leads the Faith and Freedom Coalition and is not endorsing any presidential candidates.

“He’s clearly found his voice on social issues, and less than 30 days from the Iowa caucuses the timing couldn’t be better.”

Gingrich further strengthened ties to grassroots evangelicals in 2009, launching a group aimed at bringing together religious and economic conservatives.

The organization, Renewing American Leadership, poured $150,000 into a successful Iowa campaign to unseat judges who had legalized gay marriage in the state. Many of the Iowa activists who led that 2010 campaign are now bullish on Gingrich.

Admitting to an affair also helped.

At a closed-door meeting with the nation’s top Christian Right leaders ahead of the 2008 election, Gingrich was asked about reports he’d been having an affair while leading the impeachment drive against Clinton after the Monica Lewinsky scandal.

The former speaker owned up to the affair and said it marked one the most shameful periods of his life, a time in which he was “alienated from God,” according to a participant at the meeting who spoke on condition of anonymity.

Though he didn’t run for president in 2008, Gingrich went on James Dobson’s Focus on the Family radio show to admit the affair to the evangelical icon and a national audience: “There's certainly times when I've fallen short of God's standards.”

Gingrich told listeners he’d since turned "to God to receive forgiveness and to receive mercy."

For many evangelicals, the admission and penitent tone struck a chord.

“It all depends on whether Newt has been rewired, in the theological sense of being born again,” says David Lane, an influential evangelical activist who is in regular contact with Gingrich.

“I was one of the wildest men who ever lived, loved women, wine and song, and I came to Christ,” Lane says. “I’m not perfect, but I read the Bible seven days a week. Is Newt a new man? I think he is. There’s something different about him.”

One difference is that, for the last two years, Gingrich has been an active Roman Catholic. He has described his conversion as a decade-long process inspired by Callista, who sings with a choir at the country’s largest Catholic church, Washington’s Basilica of the National Shrine of the Immaculate Conception.

Gingrich has said that years of attending Mass there rubbed off on him, with Pope Benedict XVI’s 2008 visit providing the final impetus to conversion.

Gingrich was especially drawn to the church’s millennia-long history and intellectualism. Discussing one of his visits to St. Peter’s Basilica in Rome, Gingrich has said, “You stand there and you think, this is where St. Peter was crucified. This is where Paul preached.

“You think to yourself, 2,000 years ago the Apostles set out to create a worldwide movement by witnessing to the historic truth they had experienced,” Gingrich said in 2009. “And there it is.”

As opposed to being a letdown to evangelical leaders, Gingrich’s conversion away from evangelical Christianity was received as something like a born-again experience.

“Prior to that, he was a sloppy Baptist who didn’t have a clue about what he believed,” says an evangelical activist who is close to Gingrich. “When he converted, he went through Catechism and had to get his faith straight. It took some of the sloppiness out.”

But Gingrich still has to convince some religious leaders he has straightened out morally.

In his letter to Gingrich urging a speech about his marital history, the Southern Baptist Convention’s Land told Gingrich to emphasize his own religious narrative.

“I know something of your faith journey over the past 20 years,” Land wrote. “Do not hesitate to weave that into your speech to the degree that you are comfortable doing so. It will always resonate with evangelical Christians.”

If polls are to be believed, the story of Gingrich’s journey is resonating already.

- CNN Belief Blog Co-Editor

Filed under: Baptist • Catholic Church • Lutheran • Newt Gingrich • Politics • Pope Benedict XVI • Vatican

soundoff (1,901 Responses)
  1. Dave in Kansas

    This is the best the GOP can come up with? Really? The GOP is a f'ing joke.

    December 11, 2011 at 8:15 pm |
    • Ladislav Nemec Big Bear California

      you just discovered that?

      December 11, 2011 at 8:17 pm |
  2. Marco Budgyk

    Evangelicals are embarrassing themselves by their association with Gingrich.

    December 11, 2011 at 8:13 pm |
    • Ladislav Nemec Big Bear California

      There is no way how any evangelical can be embarrassed by anything. The Almighty takes a good care of them.

      December 11, 2011 at 8:16 pm |
  3. K3Citizen

    Where's the apology to Clinton and the Democrats for trying to impeach Bill when Newt himself was out doing the same sin? It is not good policy to sin and commit crimes and then tell everyone it won't happen again now that he is older. There are way too many sinners who pretend they know God's ways. Come on now, letting Newt off would be sending signals to the youth of the nation that it is okay to sin as a youngster.

    December 11, 2011 at 8:10 pm |
    • AtheistSteve

      Your anachronistic sin concept is meaningless. Newt's actions toward the women in his life is reprehensible but that just makes him a jerk. Sin has nothing to do with it...or anything else for that matter. Everyone has it within themselves to behave in a civilized manner and to treat others fairly. Notice I didn't say respect. That needs to be earned.
      If you go through life trying to make decisions, choices, and actions that benefit others or at the very least cause the least harm then you're a good person. Sometimes even your best efforts can still fail to provide the best results. Everyone makes mistakes. Learning from them and striving to be better is what being a good moral person is. Bad people however don't do this. They don't recognize the consequences of their choices and in some cases don't care. Morality is a decision tree, a process that is constantly maturing in each of us as we grow older and wiser. Unless religion is involved, then things begin to get messy. Dictates of absolute morality and dogma removes an individuals ability to be personally responsible for their actions. No longer can you claim to be making decisions based on the overall well being of those around you. Now you are merely playing out the role cast for you by your imaginary puppetmaster God. Ultimately it leads to the ironic result of exactly what you accuse atheists of ...one of having no moral center. How else would you explain the vitriolic hatred expressed towards people who are gay for instance. There are no secular reasons to marginalize a large segment of society based solely on their choice of life partners. None...zero...it requires religion to do so. Think about it.

      December 11, 2011 at 10:13 pm |
  4. Beverly Tatum

    If evangelicals love Newt – then that tells a lot about the values and hypocrisy of evangelicals. Have they even read the Bible lately? They don't seem to know what Jesus teachings are or what the Ten Commandments say or that God is not racist.

    December 11, 2011 at 8:09 pm |
  5. Max

    Rocket Ship

    According to Trump Gingrich is surging (up) like a rocket ship. That's true, but we shouldn't forget that any rocket ship that surges will eventually fall. Like Trump, Bachmann, Cain, Paul, and Romney, Gingrich has surged to the top, but look what happened to them all! They all fell and that's the same process Gingrich is going through.

    He doesn't have much farther to go, he'll have a great fall once we start to zero in on his history. We All know Gingrich as a unfaithful father and husband who on several occasions cheated on his wives.

    This rocket ship will no simply fall, but it will eventually crash like no other.

    December 11, 2011 at 8:09 pm |
  6. Paul Williamson

    Newt is a political opportunistic that will convert to any religion that offers him a political advantage..power player conservative Southern evangelicals supporting a Catholic who has had two divorces? Yet they refuse to believe Obama is a Christian...what a joke, when Obama walks the walk (no divorces, no adultery, good family man, has helped the poor when a community organizer, no opportunistic conversions) and Newt only talks the talk. Most Evangelical Protestants do not even believe Roman Catholics are real Christians, because of the papacy and intervention of priests between man and God....the Evangelists are backing the wrong horse, but most are prejudiced against blacks anyway, which is what is really going on here. Newt could be a Hindu fakir and the evangelical power brokers would support him against Obama

    December 11, 2011 at 8:08 pm |
  7. Max

    You Bet...over $10,000...

    You bet over $10.000. As a result of Gingrich's pattern of infidelity and promiscuity, this same 'OLD' Gingrich will bring disgrace to the white house if he's elected president. Gingrich just CANNOT be trusted after being married to three wives and had extra-marital affair with the one he currently own?

    How can Americans, out of their real minds ever elect Newt, the worst among the candidates' to represent the republican party? Is this what being conservative has been watered down to? Oh! what a shame!!!!

    You bet $10, 000 he'll bring this great nation to shame...again.

    December 11, 2011 at 8:07 pm |
    • bill

      "How can Americans, out of their real minds ever elect Newt....", you say? They elected Obummer didn't they? And they were definitely out of their minds when they did that!

      December 11, 2011 at 8:14 pm |
    • Ladislav Nemec Big Bear California

      Dont' worry. At 68 years of age, it is diffiucult to be promiscuous. I have been there 9 years ago and I remember it well. 50? OK. even 60. But not pushing seventy. Even Bill Clinton slowed down, I think.

      December 11, 2011 at 8:20 pm |
    • danny

      @ bill these same americans also elected gwb twice and look were that got us.( i know repugs seem to forget his 8 years and want to blame it all on obama).thats alright go ahead and have gingrich run against obama and you will have 4 more years of change.the only repub candidate w/ a chance in the 2012 election is ron paul and ironically he has yet to be the flavor of the week for the repubs.trump, ( you see how fast he stfu when he saw a birth certificate) gingrich,cain,bachman all jokes.good luck in 2012 your gonna need it

      December 12, 2011 at 8:13 am |
  8. zip

    Man, this started out with Fox Fake News, and now we've got Fox Fake churches. So Obama is a Christian, faithful to his wife and loves his daughters. Gingrich is a serial adulterer, switches religions on a dime, and hasn't met a rule he wouldn't break. what am I missing here??

    December 11, 2011 at 7:57 pm |
  9. Nick

    Does anyone else find it odd that the Republicans are deplorably horrible and that the Democrats are no better? This is America and these men and women are our "best" choices... really? Or could it be that this false "choice" is presented to the masses as a solution to our problems, all the while neither party represents the best interest of "We the People" and truly they only really serve their own best interest? Does anyone really truly believe that their vote is going to change things in this country? Are you truly being represented? What can be done? What is the solution? Anyone have any suggestions other than childish name calling? Anyone?

    December 11, 2011 at 7:57 pm |
    • zip

      Good question. here's my solution. Take care of yourself and your family the best you can. Don't allow our government on both sides of the aisle to affect you negatively. It really doesn't matter what they do.

      December 11, 2011 at 8:02 pm |
  10. Patricksday

    Since when did Evangelical's appreciate Catholics and Adulterers? Mother Mary is highly revered and the Evangelicals dont have a feminine presence in their church like the Catholics have. But then again most "Christians" are not true followers of Jesus if they were we wouldnt have the Poverty, Hate, Violence and GREED that is at the root of all Religions.

    December 11, 2011 at 7:54 pm |
  11. Keneth

    I hope evangelicals support Newt, more ammunition for bashing them 🙂

    December 11, 2011 at 7:53 pm |
  12. Bobbya

    Like they are saints, let no man judge another unless he is pure and by God We just left our Church because of a bogus Minister!

    December 11, 2011 at 7:52 pm |
    • Troublya

      But didn't you (or other congregation members) judge that minister to be "bogus"?

      Therefore, I call you a hypocrite, based entirely on your post content.

      December 11, 2011 at 7:57 pm |
    • Ladislav Nemec Big Bear California

      good luck with the next one. You may need it.

      December 11, 2011 at 8:21 pm |
  13. Randy

    Oh boy, if this was Obama, he would have to have prostrated himself before the cameras and they still would not forgive him. That is the problem with the right...their moral teachings only apply to others, not themselves. What a joke. I am conservative and would never vote for him. We conservatives have no one...the current crop of Presidential retreads are a sad sack...get used to it...Obama will win.

    December 11, 2011 at 7:50 pm |
  14. chuckly

    Gingrich being the evangelical darling makes about as much sense as TlTs on a bull.

    December 11, 2011 at 7:49 pm |
  15. MK54

    I'd vote for Gingrich....for most likely candidate to be impeached. His weaknesses are glaring...he lusts for women, money, power and his conceit flashes like a lighthouse beacon, warning of dangerous rocks and shoals ahead.

    December 11, 2011 at 7:48 pm |
  16. Wholly Mary

    HIP-HIP-HIP-O-CRITE!

    December 11, 2011 at 7:48 pm |
  17. CONFUSED

    THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS DIVORCE....AND THERE SURELY ISN'T ANYTHING REMOTELY RELATED TO A 2ND or 3RD MARRIAGE .....WHEN WIFE # 1 is still alive..........according to any BIBLE, or understanding of Christianity a person with a wife other than his original wife who is still alive is living in sin ie an adulterous relationship, or committing BIGAMY ...as there is no divorce and he's still married to wife #1 according to any understanding of the Bible >>>>>> So how can any so- called evangelist or christian leader./group even think about supporting New Gingrich just the thought makes a mockery of their belief in their own religion

    December 11, 2011 at 7:41 pm |
  18. Scott

    Fundamentalist Evangelicals love Gingrich because Gingrich know how to hate. And hate is what has driven them since the 1960s. They became insecure when Darwin's science challenged them; they became bitter and spiteful when the free-lovin' hippies mocked them. (And God didn't strike them with lightning.) They hate Obama because he's a black intellectual progressive and symbolizes the superiority of everything they aren't. They hate, hate, hate, and that is the only common factor in their view of him. The rest is just rationalization and demonization.

    December 11, 2011 at 7:40 pm |
  19. Jeebus Loves You

    You may claim that Evangelicals are being inconsistent in backing Newt. That's not true. They have always been consistently gullible. They believed Bush was a good Christian too.

    December 11, 2011 at 7:39 pm |
  20. tbear640

    This goes to show how corrupt the right is, they are backing one of their own which is a lying, cheating individual who gets along with the evangelical pedophiles who support him. If this is what religion stands for god help the world.

    December 11, 2011 at 7:34 pm |
    • Debby

      I agree, can't stand Gingrich. He has no morals or values. He would make the worse Pres. we ever had.

      December 11, 2011 at 8:16 pm |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44
Advertisement
About this blog

The CNN Belief Blog covers the faith angles of the day's biggest stories, from breaking news to politics to entertainment, fostering a global conversation about the role of religion and belief in readers' lives. It's edited by CNN's Daniel Burke with contributions from Eric Marrapodi and CNN's worldwide news gathering team.