home
RSS
Newt Gingrich’s faith journey: How a thrice-married Catholic became an evangelical darling
Newt Gingrich has spent time as a Lutheran, a Baptist and a Roman Catholic.
December 10th, 2011
10:00 PM ET

Newt Gingrich’s faith journey: How a thrice-married Catholic became an evangelical darling

By Dan Gilgoff, CNN.com Religion Editor

Editor’s note: This is part of an occasional series of stories looking at the faith of the leading 2012 presidential candidates, including Mitt Romney, Rick Perry and Newt Gingrich. We also profiled the faith journey of Herman Cain before he suspended his campaign.

(CNN) - There’s an e-mail war raging among some of the nation’s leading evangelicals over whether Newt Gingrich has repented enough for his sins to be president.

One recent skirmish was set off by an open letter urging Gingrich to give a major speech confronting his perceived moral stumbles, including an affair with his third wife, Callista, while married to No. 2.

“You need to make it as clear as you possibly can that you deeply regret your past actions and that you do understand the anguish and suffering they caused others, including your former spouses,” Richard Land, public policy chief for the Southern Baptist Convention, wrote.

Land urged Gingrich to make a public promise “that there will be no moral scandals in a Gingrich White House.”

Rather than galvanizing the faithful, however, Land’s letter provoked an outcry from a handful of evangelical leaders who argued Gingrich has repented enough and deserves forgiveness.

On an e-mail thread among conservative Christian heavyweights, Jerry Falwell Jr. invoked the biblical story of a woman of ill repute who met Jesus at a well. Though the woman had been married five times, Jesus forgave her.

“The woman at the well was fortunate she encountered Jesus that day instead of some of our evangelical brethren,” the Liberty University president wrote, in an apparent swipe at Land.

On the same e-mail chain, which CNN obtained from a conservative activist, prominent Atlanta preacher Richard Lee said the nation’s evangelicals needed to support Gingrich.

Lee called Gingrich “the only forceful Christian candidate who can at this point be elected and cleanse the White House next November.”

The evangelical tussling over Gingrich says a lot about the fractured state of the Republican Party less than a month before the Iowa caucuses officially usher in the 2012 race for the White House.

The sight of influential evangelicals rallying around Gingrich, a Catholic with serious “values” baggage, speaks to the huge political vulnerability of Mitt Romney, who was the perceived GOP front-runner until recent polls put Gingrich at the front of the pack.

Gingrich speaking at the April 2011 National Catholic Prayer Breakfast in D.C.

Whether because of Romney’s past liberalism on gay rights and abortion or because of his Mormon faith, many of the evangelical Christians who make up the Republican base just don’t like him.

They’ve been looking for an alternative, by turns telling pollsters of their support for Michele Bachmann, then Rick Perry, then Herman Cain. One by one, they’ve dropped in the polls, or out of the race altogether. Now it’s Gingrich’s turn in the spotlight.

But the argument over Gingrich’s personal life also raises fundamental questions about the candidate himself and his readiness for the nation’s highest office.

Just how much has Gingrich changed since his days as a volatile and philandering House speaker? Does he have the character to be president? And, at least for many of the evangelical voters who will dominate the early primaries: Is he a true believer?

Faith by geography

Gingrich has identified with different branches of Christianity that mirror his surroundings at different stages of life.

Born near Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, an area settled by the largely Lutheran Pennsylvania Dutch, Gingrich was the son of a Lutheran mom and a Pennsylvania Dutch stepfather who adopted him.

Attending college at Atlanta’s Emory University and grad school at Tulane University in New Orleans, Gingrich became a Southern Baptist.

And as a creature of Washington, where Gingrich’s wife sings in a Catholic choir and where many prominent conservative Republicans have converted to Catholicism in the last decade, Gingrich joined the Catholic fold in 2009.

“I think that was all part of his pilgrimage,” says Ike Reighard, who was Gingrich’s pastor in Atlanta for nearly 20 years. “Whatever is the dominant religion in the region he was in, that was his progression... He was always super inquisitive, searching for deeper meaning.”

Gingrich’s stepdad was an army officer, making for a peripatetic family life that included stretches spent at military bases in Europe and at Fort Benning, Georgia, situated in the heart of the Bible Belt.

Gingrich, who declined interview requests for this story, was raised largely by his maternal grandmother, a devout Lutheran who, he has said, “taught me my most basic lessons about God and Satan.”

But Gingrich left his childhood denomination through an immersion baptism at the Saint Charles Avenue Baptist Church in New Orleans while at Tulane, where he was pursuing a Ph.D. in European history.

In a pattern that would last a lifetime, studying religion’s role in history and politics moved Gingrich to deepen his own faith.

Saint Charles Avenue’s pastor, G. Avery Lee, said Gingrich wasn’t a member of any church when the two first met.

“He said that in his study of political theory, he noted how much influence the church had had … and asked if I could explain,” Lee wrote in a 1994 letter to the New Orleans Times-Picayune, describing his first encounter with Gingrich.

Lee and Gingrich grew close, with the pastor eventually baptizing Gingrich even though his church took “a liberal approach to both theology and sociology.”

“It has been suggested by some that in baptizing him, I didn't hold him under long enough,” Wrote Lee, who died in 2009, in apparent reference to Gingrich’s conservative politics.

But Gingrich was more liberal back then, including on questions of separation of church and state.

“As a college student at Emory when the Supreme Court ruled that prayer was unconstitutional … I didn't notice it,” he said in a 2009 interview. “As a graduate student at Tulane I probably would have said it's a good decision.”

‘I don’t think his faith was the driving force’

After Tulane, Gingrich took a job as a history professor outside Atlanta and almost immediately began running for Congress, losing two races in the mid-’70s.

Around that time he joined New Hope Baptist Church, a 100-year old congregation south of Atlanta where Ike Reighard had recently arrived as the senior pastor.

“He had just lost for the second time and he came in and said, ‘I need your help,’” says Reighard. “I said, ‘What did you want to do in politics?’ He said he wanted to be speaker of the House.”

Gingrich won his next race for Congress in 1978. That year also marked the birth of the modern Christian Right.

The movement started in opposition to an Internal Revenue Service campaign under then-President Jimmy Carter to crack down on private schools resisting court-ordered desegregation.

Word of the campaign provoked fear and outrage among evangelical schools. Jerry Falwell joined the successful effort to thwart the IRS initiative and founded the Moral Majority the following year, in 1979. The group’s focus on fighting abortion and gay rights set the Christian Right agenda for decades to come.

Gingrich, for his part, was not considered part of the new wave of proud Christian Right warriors in Congress, some of whom were swept into power in 1980 on President Ronald Reagan’s coattails and enthusiastically blended their religious faith and politics.

For Gingrich, “I don’t think faith was the driving force,” says Reighard. “He realized that you have to look at issues and they can’t always be driven by your personal views and your religious values.”

“I heard a lot of times that people say evangelicals are one-issue people, all about abortion,” Reighard says. “But that’s not true with Gingrich. Education was important for him. Health care was important. The economy was important.”

Indeed, when Gingrich launched the Conservative Opportunity Society, an influential House caucus, in 1983, he focused on fiscal issues and practical electoral politics.

And yet Gingrich was an early ally of the budding Christian Right, even if he wasn’t a card-carrying member.

Ralph Reed, who would go on to lead the Christian Coalition, remembers watching as a libertarian activist advocating for gay rights and abortion rights challenged Gingrich at an early 1980s College Republicans breakfast.

“Newt pushed back hard,” Reed remembers. “It was clearly a position of intellectual conviction. I wasn’t yet a committed Christian and I remember finding that pretty remarkable, that Newt didn’t try to pacify this guy. He said, ‘No, you’re wrong.’”

Gingrich speaking at a 1987 news conference.

The future House speaker also stayed active at New Hope Baptist Church, which was quickly growing from sleepy country congregation to suburban Atlanta megachurch, even as he spent most of his time in Washington. When Reighard’s wife died during childbirth, Gingrich was on the phone with him while the pastor was still at the hospital.

“He was always there on Sunday mornings,” says Reighard, recalling Gingrich’s House years. “And the other thing he was always great at doing was town-hall-type meetings and potluck dinners. He was a grassroots person. There’s no telling how many of those meals I prayed at.”

Christian coalitions

But a lot of those town halls were more political than religious. Televangelist Pat Robertson launched the Christian Coalition in the early 1990s, and the group organized events around Georgia aimed at getting conservative evangelicals more involved in elections.

Gingrich, who counted himself an evangelical, expressed keen interest in the coalition’s work. But he seemed to be operating less as a pious Christian, and more as a strategist looking for ways the GOP could win the House of Representatives.

“We didn’t get into theological conversations that much,” says Patrick Gartland, executive director of the Georgia Christian Coalition in the early 1990s. “I was a grassroots numbers person. I loved the intricacies of grassroots, and he did, too, and he understood it.”

Unlike the Moral Majority in the 1980s, which was made up of pastors like Falwell, the Christian Coalition sought to mainstream the Christian Right by bringing in laypeople. The group’s local chapters were led by Christian business leaders, teachers and retirees, as opposed to pastors.

And Christian Coalition envisioned a big-tent religious conservatism that was as much about lowering taxes as it was about banning abortion.

For the broad-minded Gingrich, that vision was a perfect fit – especially after the Christian Coalition helped usher in the 1994 Republican Revolution, which put the House in GOP hands for the first time in 40 years.

The takeover catapulted Gingrich to speaker of the House, making him the country’s most powerful Republican. He vowed to pay attention to conservative Christians from his first day on the job, seeking to assuage evangelical activists who felt ignored by the Reagan administration after they’d worked hard for Reagan’s political campaigns.

“There was this dissatisfaction among evangelical leaders about [Reagan], and Newt said to me, ‘I’m not going to let that happen.’”

Best remembered for working with President Bill Clinton on fiscally focused deals like welfare reform and balancing the budget - and fiscal fights that led to a government shutdown - Gingrich also checked off major items on religious conservatives’ wish lists.

He brought a proposed constitutional amendment to allow school prayer up for a House vote. He presided over the adoption of the Partial Birth Abortion Ban Act – the first abortion restriction since Roe v. Wade – and the Defense of Marriage Act, which forbids the federal government from recognizing gay marriage.

Speaker-elect Gingrich with then-wife Marianne and his mother Kathleen at a January 1995 Washington church service.

Yet some evangelical leaders who knew Gingrich fretted over his personal life. The hard-charging speaker displayed braggadocio and rough edges even to political allies and didn’t talk much about his own faith.

“There were a lot of conservative Christian leaders who really loved Newt but felt like he hadn’t really turned his life over to God,” says Reed.

Many of those leaders went nuclear over rumors about Gingrich’s 1998 affair with a young House aide named Callista Bisek, while he was married to his second wife, Marianne.

Theose rumors “would break my heart,” says Reighard, who counseled Gingrich and Marianne in the 1990s. “I always believed that Newt could be one of the great leaders in our country, an American version of Winston Churchill.”

Reborn a Catholic

More than a decade later, Gingrich is back in many evangelicals’ good graces, with polls showing him way out in front of Romney among evangelicals in Iowa, who accounted for 60% of caucus-goers four years ago.

What explains the turnaround?

One big factor is Gingrich’s self-described faith awakening since leaving Congress in 1998. A personal turning point was 2002, when a court ruling struck down the recitation of the Pledge of Allegiance in public schools because of its “Under God” clause.

“That was the last straw,” Gingrich said in a 2009 interview with U.S. News & World Report. “And I said it’s time to challenge head-on secular domination in the West.”

Just as studying political history had led a 20-something Gingrich to the Saint Charles Avenue Baptist Church in New Orleans, political developments like the Pledge ruling and other perceived attacks on religion sparked a round of soul-searching.

Though it was later struck down by the Supreme Court, the ruling led Gingrich to publish “Rediscovering God in America,” a faith-based walking tour of Washington’s key buildings and monuments.

For those close to him, the 2006 book reflected what Gingrich had been preaching for more than a decade: that religion played a key role in the nation’s founding.

“In the ’90s, he talked about this idea that power comes from God to the individual and is loaned to the state,” says Rick Tyler, Gingrich’s former spokesman. “Before that, the European model was that power came from God to the king, and [Gingrich] used to explain why that was corrupt and how Thomas Jefferson turned it on his head.”

By increasing his public attack on the secular “media-academic-legal elite” and promoting his God-infused take on American history, Gingrich was branded a culture warrior during the last decade, gaining appeal among conservative evangelicals.

Gingrich continued the courtship by regularly appearing before audiences of hundreds of evangelical pastors to talk about God, history and politics.

Gingrich delivers the Liberty University commencement address in 2007 following Jerry Falwell

“There’s no question there’s been an evolution in his thinking and speaking and writing on America’s religious heritage, which has become a much bigger part of his lexicon,” says Reed, who leads the Faith and Freedom Coalition and is not endorsing any presidential candidates.

“He’s clearly found his voice on social issues, and less than 30 days from the Iowa caucuses the timing couldn’t be better.”

Gingrich further strengthened ties to grassroots evangelicals in 2009, launching a group aimed at bringing together religious and economic conservatives.

The organization, Renewing American Leadership, poured $150,000 into a successful Iowa campaign to unseat judges who had legalized gay marriage in the state. Many of the Iowa activists who led that 2010 campaign are now bullish on Gingrich.

Admitting to an affair also helped.

At a closed-door meeting with the nation’s top Christian Right leaders ahead of the 2008 election, Gingrich was asked about reports he’d been having an affair while leading the impeachment drive against Clinton after the Monica Lewinsky scandal.

The former speaker owned up to the affair and said it marked one the most shameful periods of his life, a time in which he was “alienated from God,” according to a participant at the meeting who spoke on condition of anonymity.

Though he didn’t run for president in 2008, Gingrich went on James Dobson’s Focus on the Family radio show to admit the affair to the evangelical icon and a national audience: “There's certainly times when I've fallen short of God's standards.”

Gingrich told listeners he’d since turned "to God to receive forgiveness and to receive mercy."

For many evangelicals, the admission and penitent tone struck a chord.

“It all depends on whether Newt has been rewired, in the theological sense of being born again,” says David Lane, an influential evangelical activist who is in regular contact with Gingrich.

“I was one of the wildest men who ever lived, loved women, wine and song, and I came to Christ,” Lane says. “I’m not perfect, but I read the Bible seven days a week. Is Newt a new man? I think he is. There’s something different about him.”

One difference is that, for the last two years, Gingrich has been an active Roman Catholic. He has described his conversion as a decade-long process inspired by Callista, who sings with a choir at the country’s largest Catholic church, Washington’s Basilica of the National Shrine of the Immaculate Conception.

Gingrich has said that years of attending Mass there rubbed off on him, with Pope Benedict XVI’s 2008 visit providing the final impetus to conversion.

Gingrich was especially drawn to the church’s millennia-long history and intellectualism. Discussing one of his visits to St. Peter’s Basilica in Rome, Gingrich has said, “You stand there and you think, this is where St. Peter was crucified. This is where Paul preached.

“You think to yourself, 2,000 years ago the Apostles set out to create a worldwide movement by witnessing to the historic truth they had experienced,” Gingrich said in 2009. “And there it is.”

As opposed to being a letdown to evangelical leaders, Gingrich’s conversion away from evangelical Christianity was received as something like a born-again experience.

“Prior to that, he was a sloppy Baptist who didn’t have a clue about what he believed,” says an evangelical activist who is close to Gingrich. “When he converted, he went through Catechism and had to get his faith straight. It took some of the sloppiness out.”

But Gingrich still has to convince some religious leaders he has straightened out morally.

In his letter to Gingrich urging a speech about his marital history, the Southern Baptist Convention’s Land told Gingrich to emphasize his own religious narrative.

“I know something of your faith journey over the past 20 years,” Land wrote. “Do not hesitate to weave that into your speech to the degree that you are comfortable doing so. It will always resonate with evangelical Christians.”

If polls are to be believed, the story of Gingrich’s journey is resonating already.

- CNN Belief Blog Co-Editor

Filed under: Baptist • Catholic Church • Lutheran • Newt Gingrich • Politics • Pope Benedict XVI • Vatican

soundoff (1,901 Responses)
  1. George

    I was always for Santorum or Bachman, but looking at all the hate on here makes me take Gingrich more seriously. People must smell a threat.

    December 11, 2011 at 9:09 pm |
    • chuckly

      You admitting you were for bachman or santorum tells us all we need to know about you anyway. Why are you not over on faux news with the other sheep?

      December 11, 2011 at 9:12 pm |
    • Tom, Tom, the Piper's Son

      Oh, please. George is just a troll. He doesn't believe what he types.

      December 11, 2011 at 10:21 pm |
  2. chuckly

    IT's a total shame. today's Christian's vote for president under one single criteria. And that is abortion. If the guy is for abortion rights, they will not vote for him, no matter what else he does or says forever. And if someone is against abortion rights, they will cast their vote no matter what else that person has done and said throughout their entire lives, even if they are on record as supporting abortion in the past, it only matters what they say now.

    December 11, 2011 at 9:09 pm |
  3. Emmy Skaddittle

    Its nice to see how far you can bend your principals, you know the ten commandments are really a Jewish thing anyways

    December 11, 2011 at 9:05 pm |
  4. Trololololo

    ...Evangelicals voting for a Catholic? is that even possible???

    December 11, 2011 at 9:05 pm |
    • Emmy Skaddittle

      They seem to think that it will be there bible belt voices that he will follow and not the pope's. I guess they are in for a rude awakening

      December 11, 2011 at 9:06 pm |
    • Andrew

      They hate catholics, but they hate mormons even worse. The whole lot would be going to hell, except it doesn't exist. It's an extrapolation from six misinterpretations of ancient Jewish terms to make them into mindless zombies. Pretty successful.

      December 11, 2011 at 9:12 pm |
  5. Get Real

    By November we are going to have double digit unemployment. It won't matter who runs against Obama...he's done.

    December 11, 2011 at 9:04 pm |
    • Andrew

      Funny, the "numbers" aren't much worse than when King George left office. You're just a sad little hater.

      December 11, 2011 at 9:10 pm |
    • Get Real

      No sport, that's where ou are wrong. I didn't vote for George. I've been following what's going on across the Pond and I don't like what I see. Europe is heading for a major recession sometime in Q1 or Q2 and will experience negative GDP. When that happens, the U.S. will be sucked in and China will slow down. You better start putting your cash under your mattress!!

      December 11, 2011 at 9:12 pm |
    • The Canadian, ...eyh...

      Agree. The EU is headed for recession, but China is already popping their real estate bubble. Things do not look good.

      December 11, 2011 at 9:36 pm |
  6. j mann

    I believe an invisible Man in the Sky is judging everybody He created and will sentence some to eternity in Hell, which is under the Earth's surface. That Man in the Sky had a Son on Earth with a vigin Earth woman. That Son grew up to be a very wise teacher, but God's plan was for Him to die a brutal death, nailed to a cross. The Man in the Sky had his Son tortured and killed so we could be saved later. If you were born before that Son was conceived or don't believe what I just said, you will go to Hell. Newt supposedly believes that too now. Go Newt!

    December 11, 2011 at 9:03 pm |
  7. gasly130

    Hilarious! This guy changes wives and denominations like the rest of us change clothes...family values and a follower of Jesus? Don't believe the "lie-hype"...

    December 11, 2011 at 9:03 pm |
  8. Independent_me

    Evangelical Christians are the biggest hypocrites!
    They refuse to believe President Obama is a Christian, but they believe that Newt is one????

    He is nothing but a fornicator and an adulterer!

    Give me a break!

    December 11, 2011 at 8:57 pm |
    • gasly130

      Seriously...

      December 11, 2011 at 8:59 pm |
    • George

      He is Christian and conservative, and that's good enough for me.

      December 11, 2011 at 9:05 pm |
    • chuckly

      why are you christians so willing to just take a guy on his word just because they say they are christian? How about their works? Shouldn't that prove what they are? They just claim they are christian and automatically have a base because the religious right are nothing but suckers, and the republicans know it.

      December 11, 2011 at 9:14 pm |
    • The Canadian, ...eyh...

      George is rather challenged in the brain cell department, as we have all seen this weekend. His critical thinking skill level is in the negative numbers. But they have roundup for third grade next month, so...well, no...there is no hope.

      December 11, 2011 at 9:40 pm |
    • Tom, Tom, the Piper's Son

      Yeah, George would have us all believe that Newtie the Cutie could be an axe-murderer, but as long as he claims he's a Christian who's "repented" for his sins, it's all okay. Anything but Obama, says George. Good job portraying the thumpers as crazy, George! You're very believable.

      December 11, 2011 at 11:00 pm |
  9. awaysaway

    I was interesting to read that the Evangelical Lee called Gingrich “the only forceful Christian candidate who can at this point be elected and cleanse the White House next November.” ...
    OK – so what is meant by "Cleanse" exactly? And do you think Obama isn't a Christian... I know he isn't as bitter and nasty as these evangelicals and hasn't cheated on a sick wife, but really? And perhaps Morman is only 4/5th Christian? It all seems like modern day racism disguised as Christian love?

    December 11, 2011 at 8:56 pm |
  10. novoodoo

    How funny.. The guy represents most everything that is against what religions preach on family. Obama is everything about what religion preaches. Just goes to show you, religion is clearly an act of the brainwashed delusional. I treat religion as po-rn and keep it away from kids. The religious don't like that since the brainwashing doesn't stick as well if you can't begin it when they are still small children. How unfair.. Please let kids be kids without the freaky voodoo.

    December 11, 2011 at 8:55 pm |
    • Independent_me

      I hate to say it – but I agree with you..,
      And I am a Christian...however, I no longer subscribe to any religious organization and I have stopped going to church altogether because they are nothing but a bunch of hypocritical rethuglican devils!

      December 11, 2011 at 9:00 pm |
  11. RobinMO

    Serial adultery is popular among evangelicals. The more you sin the more you get to repent and beg for forgiveness. To hell with trying to do what's right.

    December 11, 2011 at 8:55 pm |
  12. dumascristian

    Till death do we part. Or whatever.

    December 11, 2011 at 8:55 pm |
  13. chuckly

    I would like for any christian out there to answer this very simple question. But I doubt any will have the guts to answer.

    Explain how voting for Newt Gingrich for president is not 100 percent hypocritical for any christian to do?

    December 11, 2011 at 8:54 pm |
    • novoodoo

      same held true with McCain.. The guy left his disabled wife and kids for a woman with $$

      December 11, 2011 at 8:57 pm |
    • Independent_me

      I am a Christian, and I will answer...

      VOTING FOR A SERIAL ADULTERER, LIAR, CHEATER LIKE NEWT IS 100% HYPOCRITICAL!

      I am from this moment on never going to refer to myself as a Christian again – those evangelicals have made a mockery of the designation. I now only choose to identify myself (if I need to do so) as "a follower of the Christ".

      December 11, 2011 at 9:03 pm |
    • George

      I'll answer your question honestly. Gingrich is not the candidate that most Christians would want, but he is electable. We hope that he will be sympathetic to his base once he is in office. God sometimes works through even nonbelievers to accomplish His works.

      December 11, 2011 at 9:13 pm |
    • Brent

      To be a Christian is to FOREGIVE.

      December 11, 2011 at 9:30 pm |
    • The Canadian, ...eyh...

      Noot could not possibly win a general election. I hope they nominate him.

      December 11, 2011 at 9:42 pm |
    • Tom, Tom, the Piper's Son

      George would have us believe he'd vote for anyone who is a Republican, no matter how slimy, dishonest, or stupid he or she is, as long as that person has a chance of beating Obama. Nice job making conservatives look like hypocrites, George!

      December 11, 2011 at 10:27 pm |
  14. dumascristian

    GOP Family Values. Lie and Cheat!

    December 11, 2011 at 8:51 pm |
  15. steve19

    I am an evangelical, born-again Christian. I am voting for Newt Gingrich, not because of his religious beliefs or the lack thereof. I am voting for him because he has the best ideas, supports the best policies, and more that anyone else has the skill set (intelligence and experience) to be President of the United States. My second choice is Mitt Romney. There are other candidates with whom I would agree with more on a theological basis, but we are not hiring a pastor for our church. We need to elect someone who has the tools to handle what I believe is the toughest job in the world. I believe that having faith in God is an asset, because any President could use Divine assistance, but you also need someone who is ready for the job.

    December 11, 2011 at 8:49 pm |
    • awaysaway

      Yeah! I commend your common sense (if not your actual choice!) in separating the role of pastor from president

      December 11, 2011 at 8:59 pm |
    • Independent_me

      A vote for Newt or Romney is a vote against Christ...

      they are for the rich...
      Christ is for the poor...

      Good luck with that, Mr. "Christian!"

      December 11, 2011 at 9:05 pm |
  16. toadears

    Christian here. Can't stand the man. Can't stand Henry Kissinger either. I am an independent voter. I hope Christians aren't stupid enough to keep allowing this party to dictate how they vote. Vote 'em all out. None of them have earned their salaries and most made enough in graft to be rich the rest of their miserable, overbloated lives.

    December 11, 2011 at 8:49 pm |
  17. George

    How strange is it that the liberals, atheists, and nonreligious who told us under Clinton that what happens in one's personal life doesn't matter, but now they are all up in arms about Gingrich's affairs?

    December 11, 2011 at 8:46 pm |
    • secular1

      yes, the hypocracy is amazing. Back then, the religious right was so concerned about values and today is able to simply avoid these thoughts. Imagine the fun the Republicans could have had if Clinton had lived life the way Gingrich has. I think Republican stands for Hypocrit?

      December 11, 2011 at 8:55 pm |
    • RobinMO

      Liberals, atheists and nonreligious are not the ones who are constantly screaming "family values." There's a lot of hypocrisy to go around, but the evangelicals take the prize.

      December 11, 2011 at 8:58 pm |
    • awaysaway

      Did you read the article? It is about the conflicts that right-wing evangelicals have over Gingrich and nothing to do with liberals or atheists or even left-wing evangelicals (do they exist?) But by all means have a little tantrum about a non-existent point.

      December 11, 2011 at 9:03 pm |
    • Independent_me

      How strange it is that Christians at the time of Clinton told us that what Clinton did in private WAS our business...and now you are trying to tell us that what the newt did in private is NOT our business???

      Double standards work both ways, Mr. Sanctimonious!

      December 11, 2011 at 9:08 pm |
  18. Mary

    The Evangelicals are pure phony hypocrites. Gingrich cheated on his wife while she laid dying of cancer. Obama and Romney are the only two front running candidates with family values. There are others like Huntsman but they have already been whacked by the right wing nut jobs. I am voting for whomever the evangelical right wingers oppose.

    December 11, 2011 at 8:45 pm |
    • awaysaway

      I am with you. Hearing an evangelical use the phrase "cleanse the white house" was shocking. The more righteous a Christian the more morally corrupt they appear to be.

      December 11, 2011 at 9:08 pm |
  19. Tom

    Look at the timing of Newt. In 2009 he converted to Catholicism. Just in time to make an announcement in late 2010 early 2011 that he was running for president. He finally confirms he cheated on his sick wife in 2009. That is just too much coincidence for me. By the way, when Jesus forgave the woman at the well he knew in her heart how sorry she was. We do not have that luxury, we do not know what is in Newt's heart. We do know that he is like wheat in the wind and will change course, maybe for his own benefit. He has not earned my trust.

    December 11, 2011 at 8:43 pm |
    • novoodoo

      butttt catholick? It is a religion of scams..

      December 11, 2011 at 8:58 pm |
  20. secular1

    Everywhere we look in the Republican Party is hypocracy. If the religious right needs a family values Christian, then they need only look to the current President. Unfortunately, he is just not a puppet to the power brokers of the religious community.

    December 11, 2011 at 8:41 pm |
    • toadears

      All politicians are hypocrites and liars, including the current administration. Sorry. There is no good or bad party. Both stink.

      December 11, 2011 at 8:52 pm |
    • Get Real

      No, he's Nancy Palosi's puppet.

      December 11, 2011 at 9:00 pm |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44
Advertisement
About this blog

The CNN Belief Blog covers the faith angles of the day's biggest stories, from breaking news to politics to entertainment, fostering a global conversation about the role of religion and belief in readers' lives. It's edited by CNN's Daniel Burke with contributions from Eric Marrapodi and CNN's worldwide news gathering team.