home
RSS
Newt Gingrich’s faith journey: How a thrice-married Catholic became an evangelical darling
Newt Gingrich has spent time as a Lutheran, a Baptist and a Roman Catholic.
December 10th, 2011
10:00 PM ET

Newt Gingrich’s faith journey: How a thrice-married Catholic became an evangelical darling

By Dan Gilgoff, CNN.com Religion Editor

Editor’s note: This is part of an occasional series of stories looking at the faith of the leading 2012 presidential candidates, including Mitt Romney, Rick Perry and Newt Gingrich. We also profiled the faith journey of Herman Cain before he suspended his campaign.

(CNN) - There’s an e-mail war raging among some of the nation’s leading evangelicals over whether Newt Gingrich has repented enough for his sins to be president.

One recent skirmish was set off by an open letter urging Gingrich to give a major speech confronting his perceived moral stumbles, including an affair with his third wife, Callista, while married to No. 2.

“You need to make it as clear as you possibly can that you deeply regret your past actions and that you do understand the anguish and suffering they caused others, including your former spouses,” Richard Land, public policy chief for the Southern Baptist Convention, wrote.

Land urged Gingrich to make a public promise “that there will be no moral scandals in a Gingrich White House.”

Rather than galvanizing the faithful, however, Land’s letter provoked an outcry from a handful of evangelical leaders who argued Gingrich has repented enough and deserves forgiveness.

On an e-mail thread among conservative Christian heavyweights, Jerry Falwell Jr. invoked the biblical story of a woman of ill repute who met Jesus at a well. Though the woman had been married five times, Jesus forgave her.

“The woman at the well was fortunate she encountered Jesus that day instead of some of our evangelical brethren,” the Liberty University president wrote, in an apparent swipe at Land.

On the same e-mail chain, which CNN obtained from a conservative activist, prominent Atlanta preacher Richard Lee said the nation’s evangelicals needed to support Gingrich.

Lee called Gingrich “the only forceful Christian candidate who can at this point be elected and cleanse the White House next November.”

The evangelical tussling over Gingrich says a lot about the fractured state of the Republican Party less than a month before the Iowa caucuses officially usher in the 2012 race for the White House.

The sight of influential evangelicals rallying around Gingrich, a Catholic with serious “values” baggage, speaks to the huge political vulnerability of Mitt Romney, who was the perceived GOP front-runner until recent polls put Gingrich at the front of the pack.

Gingrich speaking at the April 2011 National Catholic Prayer Breakfast in D.C.

Whether because of Romney’s past liberalism on gay rights and abortion or because of his Mormon faith, many of the evangelical Christians who make up the Republican base just don’t like him.

They’ve been looking for an alternative, by turns telling pollsters of their support for Michele Bachmann, then Rick Perry, then Herman Cain. One by one, they’ve dropped in the polls, or out of the race altogether. Now it’s Gingrich’s turn in the spotlight.

But the argument over Gingrich’s personal life also raises fundamental questions about the candidate himself and his readiness for the nation’s highest office.

Just how much has Gingrich changed since his days as a volatile and philandering House speaker? Does he have the character to be president? And, at least for many of the evangelical voters who will dominate the early primaries: Is he a true believer?

Faith by geography

Gingrich has identified with different branches of Christianity that mirror his surroundings at different stages of life.

Born near Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, an area settled by the largely Lutheran Pennsylvania Dutch, Gingrich was the son of a Lutheran mom and a Pennsylvania Dutch stepfather who adopted him.

Attending college at Atlanta’s Emory University and grad school at Tulane University in New Orleans, Gingrich became a Southern Baptist.

And as a creature of Washington, where Gingrich’s wife sings in a Catholic choir and where many prominent conservative Republicans have converted to Catholicism in the last decade, Gingrich joined the Catholic fold in 2009.

“I think that was all part of his pilgrimage,” says Ike Reighard, who was Gingrich’s pastor in Atlanta for nearly 20 years. “Whatever is the dominant religion in the region he was in, that was his progression... He was always super inquisitive, searching for deeper meaning.”

Gingrich’s stepdad was an army officer, making for a peripatetic family life that included stretches spent at military bases in Europe and at Fort Benning, Georgia, situated in the heart of the Bible Belt.

Gingrich, who declined interview requests for this story, was raised largely by his maternal grandmother, a devout Lutheran who, he has said, “taught me my most basic lessons about God and Satan.”

But Gingrich left his childhood denomination through an immersion baptism at the Saint Charles Avenue Baptist Church in New Orleans while at Tulane, where he was pursuing a Ph.D. in European history.

In a pattern that would last a lifetime, studying religion’s role in history and politics moved Gingrich to deepen his own faith.

Saint Charles Avenue’s pastor, G. Avery Lee, said Gingrich wasn’t a member of any church when the two first met.

“He said that in his study of political theory, he noted how much influence the church had had … and asked if I could explain,” Lee wrote in a 1994 letter to the New Orleans Times-Picayune, describing his first encounter with Gingrich.

Lee and Gingrich grew close, with the pastor eventually baptizing Gingrich even though his church took “a liberal approach to both theology and sociology.”

“It has been suggested by some that in baptizing him, I didn't hold him under long enough,” Wrote Lee, who died in 2009, in apparent reference to Gingrich’s conservative politics.

But Gingrich was more liberal back then, including on questions of separation of church and state.

“As a college student at Emory when the Supreme Court ruled that prayer was unconstitutional … I didn't notice it,” he said in a 2009 interview. “As a graduate student at Tulane I probably would have said it's a good decision.”

‘I don’t think his faith was the driving force’

After Tulane, Gingrich took a job as a history professor outside Atlanta and almost immediately began running for Congress, losing two races in the mid-’70s.

Around that time he joined New Hope Baptist Church, a 100-year old congregation south of Atlanta where Ike Reighard had recently arrived as the senior pastor.

“He had just lost for the second time and he came in and said, ‘I need your help,’” says Reighard. “I said, ‘What did you want to do in politics?’ He said he wanted to be speaker of the House.”

Gingrich won his next race for Congress in 1978. That year also marked the birth of the modern Christian Right.

The movement started in opposition to an Internal Revenue Service campaign under then-President Jimmy Carter to crack down on private schools resisting court-ordered desegregation.

Word of the campaign provoked fear and outrage among evangelical schools. Jerry Falwell joined the successful effort to thwart the IRS initiative and founded the Moral Majority the following year, in 1979. The group’s focus on fighting abortion and gay rights set the Christian Right agenda for decades to come.

Gingrich, for his part, was not considered part of the new wave of proud Christian Right warriors in Congress, some of whom were swept into power in 1980 on President Ronald Reagan’s coattails and enthusiastically blended their religious faith and politics.

For Gingrich, “I don’t think faith was the driving force,” says Reighard. “He realized that you have to look at issues and they can’t always be driven by your personal views and your religious values.”

“I heard a lot of times that people say evangelicals are one-issue people, all about abortion,” Reighard says. “But that’s not true with Gingrich. Education was important for him. Health care was important. The economy was important.”

Indeed, when Gingrich launched the Conservative Opportunity Society, an influential House caucus, in 1983, he focused on fiscal issues and practical electoral politics.

And yet Gingrich was an early ally of the budding Christian Right, even if he wasn’t a card-carrying member.

Ralph Reed, who would go on to lead the Christian Coalition, remembers watching as a libertarian activist advocating for gay rights and abortion rights challenged Gingrich at an early 1980s College Republicans breakfast.

“Newt pushed back hard,” Reed remembers. “It was clearly a position of intellectual conviction. I wasn’t yet a committed Christian and I remember finding that pretty remarkable, that Newt didn’t try to pacify this guy. He said, ‘No, you’re wrong.’”

Gingrich speaking at a 1987 news conference.

The future House speaker also stayed active at New Hope Baptist Church, which was quickly growing from sleepy country congregation to suburban Atlanta megachurch, even as he spent most of his time in Washington. When Reighard’s wife died during childbirth, Gingrich was on the phone with him while the pastor was still at the hospital.

“He was always there on Sunday mornings,” says Reighard, recalling Gingrich’s House years. “And the other thing he was always great at doing was town-hall-type meetings and potluck dinners. He was a grassroots person. There’s no telling how many of those meals I prayed at.”

Christian coalitions

But a lot of those town halls were more political than religious. Televangelist Pat Robertson launched the Christian Coalition in the early 1990s, and the group organized events around Georgia aimed at getting conservative evangelicals more involved in elections.

Gingrich, who counted himself an evangelical, expressed keen interest in the coalition’s work. But he seemed to be operating less as a pious Christian, and more as a strategist looking for ways the GOP could win the House of Representatives.

“We didn’t get into theological conversations that much,” says Patrick Gartland, executive director of the Georgia Christian Coalition in the early 1990s. “I was a grassroots numbers person. I loved the intricacies of grassroots, and he did, too, and he understood it.”

Unlike the Moral Majority in the 1980s, which was made up of pastors like Falwell, the Christian Coalition sought to mainstream the Christian Right by bringing in laypeople. The group’s local chapters were led by Christian business leaders, teachers and retirees, as opposed to pastors.

And Christian Coalition envisioned a big-tent religious conservatism that was as much about lowering taxes as it was about banning abortion.

For the broad-minded Gingrich, that vision was a perfect fit – especially after the Christian Coalition helped usher in the 1994 Republican Revolution, which put the House in GOP hands for the first time in 40 years.

The takeover catapulted Gingrich to speaker of the House, making him the country’s most powerful Republican. He vowed to pay attention to conservative Christians from his first day on the job, seeking to assuage evangelical activists who felt ignored by the Reagan administration after they’d worked hard for Reagan’s political campaigns.

“There was this dissatisfaction among evangelical leaders about [Reagan], and Newt said to me, ‘I’m not going to let that happen.’”

Best remembered for working with President Bill Clinton on fiscally focused deals like welfare reform and balancing the budget - and fiscal fights that led to a government shutdown - Gingrich also checked off major items on religious conservatives’ wish lists.

He brought a proposed constitutional amendment to allow school prayer up for a House vote. He presided over the adoption of the Partial Birth Abortion Ban Act – the first abortion restriction since Roe v. Wade – and the Defense of Marriage Act, which forbids the federal government from recognizing gay marriage.

Speaker-elect Gingrich with then-wife Marianne and his mother Kathleen at a January 1995 Washington church service.

Yet some evangelical leaders who knew Gingrich fretted over his personal life. The hard-charging speaker displayed braggadocio and rough edges even to political allies and didn’t talk much about his own faith.

“There were a lot of conservative Christian leaders who really loved Newt but felt like he hadn’t really turned his life over to God,” says Reed.

Many of those leaders went nuclear over rumors about Gingrich’s 1998 affair with a young House aide named Callista Bisek, while he was married to his second wife, Marianne.

Theose rumors “would break my heart,” says Reighard, who counseled Gingrich and Marianne in the 1990s. “I always believed that Newt could be one of the great leaders in our country, an American version of Winston Churchill.”

Reborn a Catholic

More than a decade later, Gingrich is back in many evangelicals’ good graces, with polls showing him way out in front of Romney among evangelicals in Iowa, who accounted for 60% of caucus-goers four years ago.

What explains the turnaround?

One big factor is Gingrich’s self-described faith awakening since leaving Congress in 1998. A personal turning point was 2002, when a court ruling struck down the recitation of the Pledge of Allegiance in public schools because of its “Under God” clause.

“That was the last straw,” Gingrich said in a 2009 interview with U.S. News & World Report. “And I said it’s time to challenge head-on secular domination in the West.”

Just as studying political history had led a 20-something Gingrich to the Saint Charles Avenue Baptist Church in New Orleans, political developments like the Pledge ruling and other perceived attacks on religion sparked a round of soul-searching.

Though it was later struck down by the Supreme Court, the ruling led Gingrich to publish “Rediscovering God in America,” a faith-based walking tour of Washington’s key buildings and monuments.

For those close to him, the 2006 book reflected what Gingrich had been preaching for more than a decade: that religion played a key role in the nation’s founding.

“In the ’90s, he talked about this idea that power comes from God to the individual and is loaned to the state,” says Rick Tyler, Gingrich’s former spokesman. “Before that, the European model was that power came from God to the king, and [Gingrich] used to explain why that was corrupt and how Thomas Jefferson turned it on his head.”

By increasing his public attack on the secular “media-academic-legal elite” and promoting his God-infused take on American history, Gingrich was branded a culture warrior during the last decade, gaining appeal among conservative evangelicals.

Gingrich continued the courtship by regularly appearing before audiences of hundreds of evangelical pastors to talk about God, history and politics.

Gingrich delivers the Liberty University commencement address in 2007 following Jerry Falwell

“There’s no question there’s been an evolution in his thinking and speaking and writing on America’s religious heritage, which has become a much bigger part of his lexicon,” says Reed, who leads the Faith and Freedom Coalition and is not endorsing any presidential candidates.

“He’s clearly found his voice on social issues, and less than 30 days from the Iowa caucuses the timing couldn’t be better.”

Gingrich further strengthened ties to grassroots evangelicals in 2009, launching a group aimed at bringing together religious and economic conservatives.

The organization, Renewing American Leadership, poured $150,000 into a successful Iowa campaign to unseat judges who had legalized gay marriage in the state. Many of the Iowa activists who led that 2010 campaign are now bullish on Gingrich.

Admitting to an affair also helped.

At a closed-door meeting with the nation’s top Christian Right leaders ahead of the 2008 election, Gingrich was asked about reports he’d been having an affair while leading the impeachment drive against Clinton after the Monica Lewinsky scandal.

The former speaker owned up to the affair and said it marked one the most shameful periods of his life, a time in which he was “alienated from God,” according to a participant at the meeting who spoke on condition of anonymity.

Though he didn’t run for president in 2008, Gingrich went on James Dobson’s Focus on the Family radio show to admit the affair to the evangelical icon and a national audience: “There's certainly times when I've fallen short of God's standards.”

Gingrich told listeners he’d since turned "to God to receive forgiveness and to receive mercy."

For many evangelicals, the admission and penitent tone struck a chord.

“It all depends on whether Newt has been rewired, in the theological sense of being born again,” says David Lane, an influential evangelical activist who is in regular contact with Gingrich.

“I was one of the wildest men who ever lived, loved women, wine and song, and I came to Christ,” Lane says. “I’m not perfect, but I read the Bible seven days a week. Is Newt a new man? I think he is. There’s something different about him.”

One difference is that, for the last two years, Gingrich has been an active Roman Catholic. He has described his conversion as a decade-long process inspired by Callista, who sings with a choir at the country’s largest Catholic church, Washington’s Basilica of the National Shrine of the Immaculate Conception.

Gingrich has said that years of attending Mass there rubbed off on him, with Pope Benedict XVI’s 2008 visit providing the final impetus to conversion.

Gingrich was especially drawn to the church’s millennia-long history and intellectualism. Discussing one of his visits to St. Peter’s Basilica in Rome, Gingrich has said, “You stand there and you think, this is where St. Peter was crucified. This is where Paul preached.

“You think to yourself, 2,000 years ago the Apostles set out to create a worldwide movement by witnessing to the historic truth they had experienced,” Gingrich said in 2009. “And there it is.”

As opposed to being a letdown to evangelical leaders, Gingrich’s conversion away from evangelical Christianity was received as something like a born-again experience.

“Prior to that, he was a sloppy Baptist who didn’t have a clue about what he believed,” says an evangelical activist who is close to Gingrich. “When he converted, he went through Catechism and had to get his faith straight. It took some of the sloppiness out.”

But Gingrich still has to convince some religious leaders he has straightened out morally.

In his letter to Gingrich urging a speech about his marital history, the Southern Baptist Convention’s Land told Gingrich to emphasize his own religious narrative.

“I know something of your faith journey over the past 20 years,” Land wrote. “Do not hesitate to weave that into your speech to the degree that you are comfortable doing so. It will always resonate with evangelical Christians.”

If polls are to be believed, the story of Gingrich’s journey is resonating already.

- CNN Belief Blog Co-Editor

Filed under: Baptist • Catholic Church • Lutheran • Newt Gingrich • Politics • Pope Benedict XVI • Vatican

soundoff (1,901 Responses)
  1. Nima

    Hello there! Stunning post! I have been a frequent vioistr (much like addict ) on your website even though I had a is sue. I'm just not even absolutely sure if its the right place to question, but you have no spam comments. I receive comments just about every day. Would you help me? I praise you!

    August 1, 2012 at 12:45 am |
  2. Bug Out Bag l Fixed Blade Survival Knives l National Survival Center l Survival Book l Survival Food l Survival Gear l Survival Kits l Survival Knives l Survival Tents

    That is very fascinating, You're an overly skilled blogger. I have joined your feed and look forward to in quest of extra of your excellent post. Also, I have shared your web site in my social networks

    July 29, 2012 at 12:01 am |
  3. simo

    I am writing to make you know what a imesvrsipe encounter my princess undergone visiting yuor web blog. She mastered such a lot of details, including what it is like to possess an awesome helping heart to have other people really easily fully grasp selected problematic issues. You really did more than our own expected results. Thank you for presenting the powerful, dependable, revealing and even easy tips on the topic to Sandra.

    May 22, 2012 at 12:27 am |
    • Michal

      What i don't understood is atlaulcy how you're not really much more well-liked than you might be right now. You are very intelligent. You realize thus considerably relating to this subject, produced me personally consider it from so many varied angles. Its like women and men aren't fascinated unless it’s one thing to accomplish with Lady gaga! Your own stuffs excellent. Always maintain it up!

      June 26, 2012 at 5:16 pm |
  4. Tatiane

    Thanks for your valuable post. Through the years, I have been able to unsdretand that the actual symptoms of mesothelioma cancer are caused by the actual build up connected fluid between the lining on the lung and the chest muscles cavity. The infection may start while in the chest spot and distribute to other limbs. Other symptoms of pleural mesothelioma cancer include weight-loss, severe breathing in trouble, temperature, difficulty eating, and irritation of the face and neck areas. It really should be noted that some people having the disease never experience any kind of serious symptoms at all.

    May 19, 2012 at 4:29 pm |
  5. catholic female

    I had a protestant friend ask me how Newt can be a practicing Catholic and be divorced? I was not clear on when he converted to Catholicism so assumed he must have converted before marrying his third wife. As a divorced Catholic, I would not be able to remarry in the Catholic Church without annulment. How is it possible that he is a practicing Catholic? Does he receive communion? If his current wife is Catholic, was she married prior to Newt? Just looking for answers if anyone would shed light on this issue, I would appreciate it.

    January 29, 2012 at 8:56 pm |
  6. Sue

    I'm a cradle Catholic – thrice-married Newt is a Catholic – what a joke! There is no way the previous 2 marriages could have been annulled. He may be attending Catholic church with his wife and adopted Catholic teaching, but I was taught by the priests and nuns. Has he been baptized and received the sacraments of Penance and First Communion. As far as I'm concerened he's living in sin, and the priests I know would agree with me. As far as whether I will vote for him – I could care less if he's Catholic or not even though I'm a devout Catholic who accepts and practices the faith as outlined by the Church.
    The only thing that matters to me is that he respects life – no abortion. However, now that I know he claims he's Catholic, I am leaning toward thinking of him as a "fake" because he certainly is not a good example of a good Catholic as far as his marital track record.

    January 20, 2012 at 2:40 am |
  7. Yvonne

    Shameful of all those slinging mud at Newt Gingrich about his personal life. God is a forgiving God. God also teaches all Christians to have forgiving hearts, and also true Christians know that God is "The Judge" not human beings and it is sinful to sit in judgment on your fellowman becase that is is our saviors sole right - not humans. No true Christian will hold the 3 marriages against Newt Gingrich! Mitt Romney's faith, Mormon even allows polygamy! How can he critize Newt Gingrich. Obviiously Mitt Romney is controlled by money and power alone - not a Christian nor a true Mormon either and Flip Flopper! For Mitt, I think he simply has a submissive and passive wife! Think about it folks. It is religiously incorrect to think you can judge your fellowman. What is worse is that many of those quacking are worse than than the one they are quacking about! Shameful that the people of this country have become barbarians and uncivilized. I'm for Newt Gingrich because he is the only man with the intellect and the background to save our sinking ship. He has a track record of successes both in and out of government in his life. I will not vote for Mitt Romney if he is elected by the established republicans who think they have it all tied up and have from the git go! Down with Mitt Romney and my vote goes to Newt!

    December 20, 2011 at 1:04 pm |
    • BigSir

      He serves himself and like any narcissist is unstable. Look at his actions not what h says you Gullible fool.

      December 22, 2011 at 12:14 am |
    • chris

      let him stand up before the American people and proclaim proudly that Jesus is Lord, and I will believe he is truly a born-again Christian.

      January 7, 2012 at 9:24 am |
    • be

      Yeah....he (like the author of DOMA) believe that marriage is between one man and one woman – so long as it is one woman at a time........oh wait a minute.....he didn't even have the decency to do it one at a time. Nice........

      January 7, 2012 at 9:11 pm |
  8. Confused?

    I can't figure why Evangelical Christians wouldn't vote for a candidate who shares their values (and has proven to do so many many times) yet won't be consider simply for having a (D) next to his name, Yet willfully endorse a man who broke one of the highest commandments multiple times (even while attacking, insulting, and investigating another while committing a much worse act at the same time) just because he has (R) next to his name, therefor the correct and moral choice? Does that even make sense? Why throw away values over party? How can Evangelical values be so moral, correct, perfect, and most true over the others if it can be willfully, acceptably and easily cast aside for a (R) when a (D) is actually following the values and a better role model? Makes no sense.

    December 18, 2011 at 5:31 am |
    • BigSir

      If you are speaking of Obama, he has always taken the high road and should be admired by those who are ethical.

      December 22, 2011 at 12:17 am |
    • Amara

      hey there and thank you for your information – I have cetnairly picked up something new from right here. I did however expertise several technical issues using this site, as I experienced to reload the site many times previous to I could get it to load properly. I had been wondering if your web host is OK? Not that I am complaining, but sluggish loading instances times will very frequently affect your placement in google and could damage your high-quality score if ads and marketing with Adwords. Well I am adding this RSS to my email and could look out for a lot more of your respective fascinating content. Make sure you update this again soon..

      May 19, 2012 at 8:34 am |
  9. GodofLunaticsCreation

    [youtube=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=otxf8gbBSoY&w=640&h=360]

    December 18, 2011 at 3:56 am |
  10. Peacemaker

    Does anyone for a fact that he and his present wife were married IN the church???? The Catholic church?

    December 15, 2011 at 4:53 pm |
  11. Tucker

    Is it strange that all of his awakenings have revolved around a political event?

    December 13, 2011 at 1:48 pm |
    • Yvonne

      Your statement is totally INCORRECT! Newt, just like the rest of us lives his personal life and then he has a job - so he decided he wanted to run for President and with all the Non-Christian and Heathens slinging mud, he had no choice but to make to what some of you equate to as an Confession of his Faith to the American Public. Many of you just sleep around from one bed to the nextg or just live together and that's in all walks of life. God is a forgiving God and man's personal life and his faith are his and God's issues to solve. Shame on you for such a heathen comment.

      December 20, 2011 at 1:10 pm |
  12. Why can't someone pull an Oswald on this creepy guy?

    What a loser. Anyone who supports Newt has GOT to be very stupid and easily fooled.

    December 13, 2011 at 10:25 am |
  13. Nawt Gettingrich

    With either Nawt Gingrich or Mutt Romney, 'Bama will win in 2012. Ron Paul is the GROP's only hope.

    December 13, 2011 at 7:19 am |
  14. McLovin

    I don't see what the problem is... I'd like to see the White House transformed into Newt's Tiffany Love Castle.

    December 12, 2011 at 8:09 pm |
  15. Snow

    So here is a foolproof way to heaven.. be as much of an a$.$hole as you want and sin like a seahorse.. but every night, go visit a church and confess – your plate will be wiped clean..

    Such Religion does not preach people to be good or better themselves.. it preaches people of ways around being held accountable for their behavior. Great morality you learn from the book.. eh?

    December 12, 2011 at 7:51 pm |
    • McLovin

      ... besides, have you seen his ex-wife, I don't care if she was on her deathbed, Newt had to trade her in for Callista.

      You can't fault any man for trying to improve his honey pot. They get old, wrinkled, and stinky, and it's time for a new one.

      December 12, 2011 at 8:15 pm |
    • captain america

      That would explain why Tom Tom is so angry. Plus,. she's canadian.

      December 12, 2011 at 11:46 pm |
    • captain america

      captain america does not give a sh it about tom tom and would never post such a lame statement.

      December 13, 2011 at 6:23 am |
    • Praveen

      Things i have observed in terms of pc moermy is the fact that there are requirements such as SDRAM, DDR and so forth, that must match up the specs of the mother board. If the personal computer's motherboard is kind of current while there are no main system issues, improving the ram literally normally requires under an hour. It's among the easiest laptop upgrade treatments one can think about. Thanks for revealing your ideas.

      July 30, 2012 at 12:37 am |
  16. truefix

    No one has mentioned Bill Clinton, and his sins of the flesh as president. Let me guess it doesn't matter what Clinton did ,because you faithless people, don't really give a rats ass, as long as said person fit your ideology. You all judge Gingrich but you too have a caber in your eye. I imagine that not one of you has caused distress to a family member or friend or spouse..One day all will be judged by God, or by who ever, or by what you believe in...you better just hope you will be forgiven.

    December 12, 2011 at 7:38 pm |
    • Snow

      No body is defending him either, jacka$$.. only believers in fairy tales feel the urge to defend any person's BS as long as they claim they go to church and confess.. we do as we see.. if we see a believer or a non-believer act like an amoral moron, we call him on that..

      December 12, 2011 at 7:45 pm |
    • kiki

      It seems to have escaped your attention that Clinton isn't currently running for office.

      December 12, 2011 at 8:22 pm |
    • BigSir

      Take a good long look at Hilary then fault the man for straining a blue dress.

      December 22, 2011 at 12:20 am |
  17. Reality

    Only for the "newbies":

    Hmmm, the infidelity, cheating, lying and theological flaws of Newtown Leroy Gingrich vs. the theological flaws, wishy-wash -on- life of Romney vs. the theological flaws, "vote-mongering", pro-choice/abortion of Obama?? Why not have Google run the country?
    =========================================================================================

    December 12, 2011 at 6:14 pm |
    • .........

      for the oldies hit report abuse on reality

      December 13, 2011 at 6:24 am |
  18. Mr. Izz

    So... the repentance process is as follows: confess your sins to God, be humble and sorry for what you've done, do what you can to make things right, and make a promise – between you and God – that you'll never do it again. Gingrich did the same thing twice (that we know of). Does this seem like someone who does truly feel sorry for what he has done and has "repented enough"? Actions do speak louder than words, and his actions are not what I want for the President of the United States. This is the most powerful position anyone can achieve. Dang straight we're going to look at the character of a person in this position.

    Also, if religion is going to be brought to the political realm, especially by these evangelical political supporters (sounds like an oxymoron to me), then the background, religious nature, and character of the person in question are definitely free game to critique. If religion can be used as a tool by these politicians to boost their numbers, then their actions should also be judged by those same religious beliefs, and shouldn't be overlooked by those that deem themselves to be these evangelical leaders. I'm not saying that my beliefs should have weight on a nominee, but if the nominee is vocal and adamant about their own religion, they need to be living up to those expectations. I respect that kind of commitment. I assume others would agree. Alternatively, the candidate shouldn't have their numbers increase because the religious "higher-ups" exchange emails about it. The candidate should be showing me that they can be steadfast in what they believe, and will hold firm to those standards. Flip-flopping works in religion too, not just politics.

    If Newt Gingrich gets the nod by the GOP, then expect to see Obama for four more years. I really don't think Gingrich can stand up to Obama, and I don't think the majority of Americans would vote for Gingrich. Yes, Gingrich may have some good ideas, but they are only good ideas. Making them happen, and devising a strategy on how to do them, is an entirely different kind of question. I sit and listen to the debates and hear many great ideas... then lingering thoughts occur: "how would you even go about doing that?" ... "is that even possible right now in this country?"

    The country needs plans and goals, and needs to be held accountable for not reaching them. I have a job, there are things I need to be doing, and I have long term goals set for me that have to be done. If I don't reach them, I lose my job. Why are the government positions and personnel any different? We, the people, need to hold them accountable, regardless of political party wants. I say "wants" because the government, working together as they should be doing, have to figure out what this country "needs" ... then make it happen.

    To be perfectly honest, the people in our government all need to be removed, and we need to start over with a clean slate. The idea of our government is great; how it is being run is definitely not very good. This country was built on the idea of compromise, and currently, there isn't any. Obama can't break that barrier right now with Congress, I'm not sure Gingrich, Romney, or others can either; although, I think Romney has the best chance of the nominees to do so. Still, it seems to be an insurmountable challenge for any candidate.

    Things need to change, or the country will continue to fall. We're not in shambles yet, but the ticking time bomb is definitely counting down.

    December 12, 2011 at 5:18 pm |
  19. RAY .M. SVOBODA

    I AM A CATHOLIC AND I HAVE A QUESTIO0N FOR N. GINGRICH. HAVE YOU EVER READ JESUS'S "SERMAN ON THE MOUNT".? IF YOU HAVE NOT PLEASE DO . IT OUTLINES A CATHOLIC'S OUTLOOK ON CHRISTIAN ETHICS. IN IT JESUS STATED THINGS ONE MUST DO TO BE AWARDED ETERNAL LIFE IN GOD'S KINGDOM. MAYBE YOU WILL CHANGE YOUR OUTLOOK TOWARDS THE LESS FORTUNATE.

    December 12, 2011 at 3:50 pm |
    • Mad The Swine

      What a terrible post.

      December 12, 2011 at 6:51 pm |
    • CT

      Why is it a terrible post? Because it exposes "faux" Christians for what they are? Haters, Liars and Bigots? Jesus said "Depart from me ......I knew you not!"

      December 13, 2011 at 7:08 am |
    • Honos

      Catholic. Yes we seem to be everywhere and are all types. My problem with Mr. Gingrich's candidacy is not whether or not he is repentent, that is up to him. It isn't whether or not he is catholic or protestant. It is his track record and how he has chosen to pursue his career. If one can betray his wife easily, the same can also with even more ease be said he can betray his country. Go home Newt. Care for your wife. Become a janitor at the local grade school if you have to. Get your priorities in order and let the whole glory thing go. I am conservative, I pray with my children daily, and honestly, I cannot in good conscience vote for any party representative that I have seen or read about. Their priorities simply, are not in order. And the Dems and liberals, well too bad there is only choice evil number 1 and evil number 2. Are there any men who will serve their country as a servant anymore? George Washington, you are sorely missed. Give up your sword Newt, go home and take care of your family and the woman you should be loving.

      December 20, 2011 at 1:53 pm |
  20. Suffolk100

    Why wouldn't they accept ole Newt. The Evangelical religion is nothing more than a cult religion. Cults take anyone in.

    December 12, 2011 at 3:47 pm |
    • kiki

      Evangelical Dominionism is a business.

      December 12, 2011 at 4:08 pm |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44
Advertisement
About this blog

The CNN Belief Blog covers the faith angles of the day's biggest stories, from breaking news to politics to entertainment, fostering a global conversation about the role of religion and belief in readers' lives. It's edited by CNN's Daniel Burke with contributions from Eric Marrapodi and CNN's worldwide news gathering team.