home
RSS
December 31st, 2011
10:00 PM ET

Why do Iowa’s evangelicals wield so much political clout?

By Dan Gilgoff, CNN.com Religion Editor

Des Moines, Iowa (CNN) – At first blush, it’s just another standard-issue political rally.

Inside Mitt Romney’s Iowa headquarters – a former Blockbuster store on a commercial strip outside downtown – Romney and his wife, Ann, are introduced by former presidential candidate Tim Pawlenty and his wife, Mary.

“It is an honor to be supporting Gov. Romney and Ann,” Mary Pawlenty tells the crowd of a couple hundred, a silver cross dangling from her neck. “They are good people, they share our values – these are people that we are delighted to call friends.”

How Mitt Romney's faith shaped him

A few moments later, Mitt Romney mentions his five sons and hands his microphone to 36-year-old Josh, who calls his dad “my hero.”

“He taught me my great love for this country,” Josh says, “and my great love for my family.”

Sounds like typical political posturing, right? Many Americans wouldn’t give such gestures a second thought.

But experts on religion and politics say the message to one particular subculture – evangelical Iowans – is clear: Mitt Romney may be Mormon, but he shares evangelical Christian values, including a rock-solid commitment to family, and counts high-profile evangelicals like the Pawlentys as friends and supporters.

“It’s less an attempt to create a trust among evangelicals and more to defuse a distrust,” says Dennis Goldford, a political science professor at Drake University in Des Moines.

Mark DeMoss, an evangelical PR specialist and Romney campaign adviser, puts a more positive spin on the strategy: “A number of evangelicals are really enthusiastic about him and have endorsed Romney, and for the same reason that I like him – he shares my values.”

Romney’s Mormonism and his past social liberalism have fed doubts about him among some evangelicals. But with the first-in-the nation Iowa caucuses just days away, the former Massachusetts governor is hardly the only candidate honing his message for evangelical Iowans.

Newt Gingrich has met with hundreds of evangelical pastors in the state, talking policy but also about past marital infidelity, which many Christians consider a sin. Rick Perry has given Sunday morning testimonials from the pulpits of Hawkeye State megachurches.

Newt Gingrich's faith narrative

And Rick Santorum, who is riding a late-breaking surge in Iowa polls, and Michele Bachmann have all but staked their candidacies on winning big among evangelical Iowans, claiming to be more conservative than the rest of the Republican field on hot-button issues like abortion and gay marriage.

How did one faith-based demographic come to wield so much power? The answer is basic math – and passion.

“Relatively few people participate in the Iowa caucuses, so it’s ideal for a group of highly committed activists to have a big influence,” says John Green, an expert on religion and politics at the University of Akron.

Unlike conventional primaries, Iowa’s caucuses, scheduled for Tuesday, require voters to attend what are essentially community get-togethers at which participants can speak publicly for candidates. It’s more cumbersome than pulling a lever in a voting both, and a relatively small minority of registered voters attend.

“Evangelical churches and interest groups have been able to generate that kind of activity,” Green says. “They’ve been active in Iowa for a long time, so a tradition has taken hold there.”

Rick Perry's long faith journey culminates in White House run

In 2008, evangelical Christians accounted for 60% of Republican caucus-goers. With just 119,000 Iowans participating in the GOP caucuses that year – high by historical standards – the bloc helped propel Mike Huckabee, a former Baptist preacher, to a first-place finish.

In previous election cycles, evangelicals accounted for a more modest share of the Iowa GOP electorate, but their ranks have nonetheless hovered around 40%.

That makes evangelical Iowans unusually influential even by the standards of the national Republican Party, in which evangelical Christians have constituted the base since Ronald Reagan was elected president.

From Carter to Bush

Despite the modern GOP-evangelical alliance, it was a Democrat who first tapped that power base in Iowa.

Jimmy Carter was the first presidential candidate in modern American politics to call himself a born-again Christian, and he spent long stretches in Iowa during his 1976 campaign. Finishing ahead of every candidate (“uncommitted” took first) there lent early momentum to a candidate who’d been virtually unknown nationally.

Before Carter, says Drake’s Dennis Goldford, “evangelicals didn’t participate in politics because it was seen as this “worldy, corrupting, evil thing, and you stayed away from it.”

Modern American evangelicalism emerged in the late 19th century, built around biblical literalism and an emphasis on human sin and redemption. The movement was largely a reaction to Darwin’s theory of evolution and questions that modern science raised about biblical authority.

The 1925 Scopes Monkey Trial, which struck down the teaching of evolution in Tennessee schools, turned the evangelical movement into a national laughingstock and provoked an evangelical retreat from politics.

Carter, a Baptist Sunday School teacher, brought them back together.

But many evangelicals wound up feeling betrayed by Carter’s liberalism, and Reagan’s courtship of first-generation Christian right leaders, as well as his conservative rhetoric on issues like abortion, sent hordes of evangelicals to the GOP.

In 1988, televangelist Pat Robertson finished second in the Iowa caucuses, ahead of then-Vice President George H.W. Bush, putting Iowa evangelical power on the national map. Says Goldford: “They came out of nowhere.”

In the 1990s, with the rise of Robertson’s Christian Coalition, many evangelicals landed positions of power within the Iowa Republican Party. Catholics and other religious believers also became more active in the state GOP, raising the profile of issues like abortion and marriage, but they could not compete in number with the evangelicals.

Since then, Republican presidential hopefuls have tailored their messages to evangelical Iowans. When George W. Bush was asked which political philosopher had most influenced him in a debate before the 2000 Iowa caucus, he responded “Jesus.”

A diluted role?

In this election cycle, all the Republican presidential candidates have spoken deeply about their personal Christian faith while in Iowa, except for Romney and Jon Huntsman, both Mormons.

After spending considerable time in Iowa in 2008, much of it courting evangelicals, Romney placed second, far behind Huckabee. This time around, Romney has spent much less time here, skipping some major evangelical cattle calls and unleashing the ire of some powerful Christian activists.

Huntsman, for his part, has ignored Iowa to focus his efforts on New Hampshire, which votes a week after Iowa.

A CNN/TIME/ORC poll last week found that Romney had the support of 16% of likely evangelical caucus-goers in Iowa, compared to 22% for Santorum, 18% for Ron Paul and 14% for Gingrich, who had much higher evangelical support in earlier Iowa polls.

“Romney’s campaign has a very deliberate plan to snub social conservatives,” says Steve Scheffler, president of the Iowa Faith and Freedom Coalition, a key conservative group in the state.

“If Romney becomes the nominee,” Scheffler says, “95% of his volunteers will need to come from the conservative base. If he’s dissed them through the caucus process, it’s going to be challenging for him to get these people to campaign for him to become president.”

Scheffler is a testament to evangelical influence in the caucuses; his group has hosted caucus trainings in churches across the state in the run-up to January 3.

Most evangelical leaders insist their skepticism of Romney is born of his past social liberalism. But some in-the-pews evangelicals, interviewed at a pair of Iowa evangelical churches on a recent Sunday, admitted to an anti-Mormon bias.

Many believe that Mormons – who, unlike traditional Christians, believe in holy books beyond the Bible and practice customs like posthumous proxy baptism – belong to a cult.

“A growing number of people are afraid to vote for him because they are not sure how his Mormonism will affect his presidency,” says Jonathan Meyer, a pastor at Grace Church in Des Moines. “And because he doesn’t talk about that.”

Other Iowan evangelicals say Romney’s Mormonism isn’t a deal-breaker. “We talked about it in my Bible study,” says Patrick Finnegan, 27, who attended a recent Romney rally wearing a blue “Romney supporter” T-Shirt. “And we said as long as he believes in Jesus Christ, and as long as he’s not an atheist, we support him. I just want someone who shares my belief in a higher power.”

Other Iowa evangelicals echoed that view, calling Romney a Christian.

One complicating factor in the evangelical equation is that the main alternative to Romney as a viable national candidate appears to be Gingrich. The former House speaker has strenuously courted evangelical leaders and aided last year’s successful campaign to unseat three pro-gay marriage Iowa judges but has admitted to personal moral failings, including an affair with his current wife while married to his second wife.

Many Iowa evangelicals say Gingrich has redeemed himself. “I appreciate Newt acknowledging that he needs forgiveness,” says Meyer, who speaks with a Bible tucked under his arm in the Christmas-tree bedecked lobby of Grace Church. “He didn’t have to address that.”

Others are less enthusiastic.

“There’s not enough attention being paid to Newt’s fall from grace,” says Beverly McLinden, 55, an Iowa evangelical who works in association management and attended the Des Moines Romney rally. “Romney’s family exemplifies family values, and you can’t discount that just because he’s a Mormon.”

Evangelical angst over Gingrich and Romney has helped fuel Santorum’s surge, with the former Pennsylvania senator receiving 16% support in the most recent CNN poll, putting him in third place, behind Romney and Paul.

No candidate had even 25% of evangelical support in the most recent poll, raising the possibility that Iowa’s evangelical vote will be pretty diluted this week.

“This vote is terribly critical,” says Ralph Reed, who leads the national Faith and Freedom Coalition. “But the irony is that with this many candidates all appealing to this constituency at the same time, the vote is likely to get spread out.”

‘Democrats are trying to strip God out’

If Iowa’s evangelicals disagree on whom to support, interviews with dozens of them reveal a striking consistency in the role their faith plays in shaping that decision.

Even as the economy and jobs consistently rank as top issues in the presidential race, many evangelical Iowans say they’re weighing the personal faith of the candidates and that they still care about social issues and honoring the country’s Judeo-Christian heritage.

“Most of the folks I’ve dealt with in the evangelical community always care about the economy and spending and taxes,” says Santorum, who has spent most of his time as a presidential candidate campaigning in Iowa. “But the priority issues that have always been up front are the moral, cultural issues.”

“They want to make sure that it’s someone who is comfortable in their skin to fight those battles,” says Santorum, a devout Catholic who has nonetheless landed on TIME’s list of America’s 25 most influential evangelicals.

Gail Johnson, a dentist’s assistant who was heading into Grace Church – a megachurch whose sanctuary is hung with giant Christmas wreaths and a back-lit cross – agrees.

“I have no clue who I’m voting for, other than that it will be a Republican,” she says. “Smaller government and no abortion are the two big issues for me.”

Grace Church is the kind of congregation where worshippers take notes during the sermon, which on this Sunday focused on the importance of believing in Jesus’ virgin birth.

Sue Cornelius-Leibrand, an accountant who also attends Grace, says she would prefer “a president who believes in the same things that I do.”
“I know they won’t agree with everything,” says Cornelius-Leibrand, who wears diamond earrings and carries a stylish black bag and a leather-bound bible with a pink strap. “But the main things, like life beginning at conception and marriage between a man and a wife.”

Many evangelicals cite what they see as religion’s shrinking role in the public square as another concern. “This nation was founded on Christian ethics and that’s what made the country great,” says Sue Raibikis, a pharmaceutical sales rep and an evangelical Christian who attended the Romney rally. “Democrats are trying to strip God out of the country.”

Republican candidates are addressing those concerns in different ways. Gingrich talks about stopping a secular war on religion. Perry gives Christian testimony, telling worshippers at Des Moines’ Point of Grace Church on a recent Sunday: “There’s a hole in one’s heart that can only be filled by one thing.”

Santorum and Bachmann are emphasizing their voting records on hot buttons like abortion, saying other candidates just talk about these issues.

The jockeying introduced a major shot of religion to the presidential race from the very start, a contribution that some political experts argue threatens to curtail Iowa’s influence in the nominating process.

“The strength of evangelicals in the Iowa Republican Party could turn into a weakness if they are seen as so strong that Republicans around the nation begin to discount the results of the caucuses,” says Drake University’s Goldford.

“You’re beginning to see some of that – McCain chose not to campaign here last time,” he says. “And Romney hasn’t been here much this time.”

The state’s track record for picking Republican winners is mixed. Huckabee, for instance, won big in Iowa but lost his party’s nomination. But George W. Bush and Bob Dole won Iowa and went on to the GOP nomination.

The Republican primary calendar, if nothing else, will strengthen the influence of Iowa and its evangelicals, argues Green, of the University of Akron.

New Hampshire, with fewer evangelicals, follows Iowa in primary voting. But the next in line is South Carolina, where 60% of voters in the last Republican presidential primary identified as evangelicals.

- CNN Belief Blog Co-Editor

Filed under: Christianity • Iowa • Michele Bachmann • Mike Huckabee • Mitt Romney • Newt Gingrich • Politics • Rick Santorum

soundoff (837 Responses)
  1. rami

    Ok, I dont see an issue of having President or VP who is religious. However, as non christian, i can see some of the evangelical leaders try to change the world to fit their view without any regard to other people beliefs or faith.

    January 1, 2012 at 9:51 am |
  2. elle

    Interesting that the article mentions Reagan. His handlers had the cunning to see that he could polarize Christians themselves by pandering to the most regressive and intolerant element among them. The damage he wrought continues to reverberate. Christians had formerly been seen as in the forefront of tolerance and empathy, i.e., leadership in the civil rights movement, opposition to Naziism in Europe to the point of martyrdom. But Reagan's handlers (I say handlers because Reagan himself was not in their league when it came to brains) adjusted the playing field and the issues for pure political gain and left American Christians branded as hayseed nutjobs vulnerable to global ridicule and much feared. He did a great disservice to Christian intellectualism and actually served as a spur to atheism. I used to see Christians as people who were for doing the humane thing, who reached deep for empathy. Now even the word "Christian" carries a connotation of intolerance. The whole perception has changed, and.. what was it Yeats said, "the best lack all conviction while the worst are full of passionate intensity" - something like that. Enlightened Christians need to reclaim their clout and their moral high ground.

    January 1, 2012 at 9:49 am |
    • rami

      Well put elle, if I may, I'm going to copy and save it for later use.
      Thank you for a very will thought artical. Wish we have more of you.

      January 1, 2012 at 9:56 am |
    • Jim

      Elite – by your reasoning the German people had nothing to do with the holocost, it was all one man. The Tealiban did this to themselves.

      And you're correct, announcing you're a "Christian" does connote intolerance.

      January 1, 2012 at 10:04 am |
    • hismajestyjoe

      Christianity has always been about intolerance to sin. That doesn't mean all sins need to be legislated. Thats the mistake that the Muslim countries make. Regardless if its legislated on earth or by God one way or another you have to pay for your sin. It doesnt matter how much support you try to drum up for your sinful behavior you cant make it right. There is absolute right and wrong.

      January 1, 2012 at 10:05 am |
  3. Dan

    Apparently the grammar intern has the day off, as CNN doesn't check their front page word usage.

    January 1, 2012 at 9:42 am |
    • Missy76

      who CARES!

      January 1, 2012 at 9:43 am |
    • trista

      ...you mean doesn't check its front page word usage. "Their" is the plural, so you need to watch subject-verb agreement (in American English. British English sees a corporation like CNN as a plural, but I don't believe you intended that).

      January 1, 2012 at 9:55 am |
  4. Missy76

    TAX the churches! They do not support the poor and disenfranchised. Their leaders tell them how to vote and like sheep they follow what is spewed from the pulpit.

    January 1, 2012 at 9:41 am |
  5. thereturn

    religiulus. destroyed our traditions then brought your ignorance to N. America. demons await you and you are ill-prepared for death. enjoy your hamburger.

    January 1, 2012 at 9:39 am |
  6. Truth Hurts

    I consider myself a Christian, born and raised. But these people scare the crap out of me. I definitely want to keep religion out of my Government. I do not want a cleric as President of the United States. And this country was not founded on Christian values, not any that you would recognize today.

    January 1, 2012 at 9:38 am |
  7. boyamidumb

    American Taliban. Just as wrong and just as dangerous to us all.

    January 1, 2012 at 9:37 am |
    • Jim

      Like

      January 1, 2012 at 9:39 am |
    • Missy76

      exactly!

      January 1, 2012 at 9:42 am |
  8. IceT

    I consider religious followers political opinions to be as valid as astrologists, ghost hunters and 38 yo gamers still living in their Mother's basements.

    January 1, 2012 at 9:33 am |
    • Jim

      That's insulting to 38-year-old gamers that live in their mother's basement.

      January 1, 2012 at 9:35 am |
  9. Johnson

    I doubt many will buy the Romney pitch. He is not a Christian no matter how many times he claims he is. We just have to read his new bible found, then lost, then found again inside a hat.

    January 1, 2012 at 9:31 am |
    • Jim

      The old bible is just as useless. Evangelicals pick and choose the parts that suit their desire to control people today.

      January 1, 2012 at 9:34 am |
  10. Zaphod2010

    Oh please, these religious nuts have no say whatsoever. They want women to go back to alley abortion clinics. They only want their religion to count regardless of how many others there are.
    @mw1979 – sorry buddy but "blacks voted for Obama" rant is clueless. Plenty of whites voted for him also.
    The moral majority is NEITHER!!!! The more they try to ram their religious beliefs down our throats the more people they lose in their fight. timothy mcveigh would be proud!!

    January 1, 2012 at 9:31 am |
  11. faberm

    If the Evangelical Christians had the clout this article says they have then Bachman would have 60% of the Iowa vote. She doesn't, so the article disproves itself.

    January 1, 2012 at 9:30 am |
  12. Jim

    Science flies you to the moon.

    Religion flies you into buildings.

    January 1, 2012 at 9:28 am |
    • Tom

      EXCELLENT point!

      January 1, 2012 at 9:36 am |
    • MissusPowell

      That is just silly...and really flippant. I mean it doesn't even make sense. Science flew the Space Shuttle into an explosion and deterioration across Texas.

      Religion isn't science, anyway.

      January 1, 2012 at 9:42 am |
    • Linda

      Science may fly us to the moon and religion may fly some into buildings but GOD flies His chosen into eternity.

      January 1, 2012 at 9:47 am |
    • Peppermint Patty

      Science didn't fly the Shuttle into oblivion, either time. Incompetence, and bureaucratic corner cutting at NASA did that.

      January 1, 2012 at 9:47 am |
    • jules

      Missus...what part of Jim's statement doesn't make sense to you? Couldn't be clearer or more correct! Get your head out of you Bible and realize your religion is tainting your ability to think logically about the world that exists around you.

      January 1, 2012 at 10:15 am |
    • Peppermint Patty

      Linda,
      You just changed everything. Your religion teaches EVERYONE, not just the chosen, are flown into eternity. It's just that some are flown up, and some are flown down. Then there is the scientific/philosophical problem of "eternity", when space-TIME supposedly, (according to your religion), exists as a creature of your "almighty", so there was no "eternity" for it to exist in before he created it, (or else he is not the "creator" of everything). There goes "eternity".

      January 1, 2012 at 10:22 am |
    • JohnR

      God can go fly a kite. Actually, "he" no doubt CAN'T do that any more than "he" can do anything.

      January 1, 2012 at 10:26 am |
  13. Jacqui

    Jesus warned his followers to beware the yeast of the Pharisees. He also said that some worship Him with their lips, but their hearts are far from Him. When you see a man say whatever he thinks is politically correct, just so he can win the vote of the evangelicals, as Mr Romney does, you know you have a fraud.

    When I hear Christians say that he shares their values, I have to ask, what values? Jesus said to be careful lest you be deceived, for there are wolves, who come dressed as sheep. There are many Buddhists, Muslims, Hindus and people of other faiths who live moral lives, but they don't share the values of Christians. This man worships a different God. His Jesus, IS NOT THE ONE that evangelicals serve, who was born a virgin, and lived a life that consistent with the Word.

    January 1, 2012 at 9:28 am |
  14. GullibleChristians

    I am glad to see those muslims bombed the churches.
    They are all brainless anyway.

    January 1, 2012 at 9:27 am |
    • rami

      Glad you are here moron.

      January 1, 2012 at 10:27 am |
  15. mw1979

    One more thing–Check your hypocrisy too...If black people chose to vote for Obama because he's black, then why do you have a problem with people who chose to vote for a candidate with similar religious views????

    January 1, 2012 at 9:27 am |
    • Jim

      Because black people don't try to make me black, but evanglals want to make me evangelical.

      January 1, 2012 at 9:30 am |
    • JohnR

      BINGO, JIM!

      January 1, 2012 at 10:27 am |
  16. MissusPowell

    The PROBLEM is that people want to believe they have it right–The Right God, The Right Religion, The Right Rules and are deeply threatened when someone doesn't believe as they believe. This causes all kinds of problems for all the people of the world. It isn't only the different religions, but can also be seen with different races, different clubs, anything that is different from what we (or I) am familiar with, what I think is TRUTH, and comfortable for us. SO what happens is they -, we, I want to extend my comfort zone to all the world so as to not have to change or feel afraid that just maybe we have it wrong, or at least not 100% right. It is just alot easier to live in our safe little bubble of rightness. So our army of self protection ultimately ends up with hate, racism, etc. etc. NOT GOOD for any of us. It is one thing to have the freedom to believe what we believe, but we cannot and must not insist everyone else believe as we do.

    January 1, 2012 at 9:25 am |
  17. some dude

    What aboot separation of church and state?
    Keep your religious hands off of my government!

    January 1, 2012 at 9:25 am |
    • Jim

      And out a women's reproductive decisions.

      January 1, 2012 at 9:31 am |
    • william

      You got that right!

      January 1, 2012 at 9:36 am |
  18. GullibleChristians

    I would rather vote for a smart and open-minded runner instead.
    This country has too many stupid religious people.

    January 1, 2012 at 9:25 am |
  19. J

    Conservatives should vote for Rick Santorum

    January 1, 2012 at 9:24 am |
  20. mw1979

    Religions have principles of some sort, so religious people practice or observe their respective religious principles, correct? Well, principles are not things that change from year to year, trend to trend, so it only makes sense that people who are principled (ie religious) use their value system when they make personal decisions. Voting is a personal decision.

    I say all of this it's apparent that godless liberals see red when an Evangelical Christian publicly describe their reasoning for voting for Candidate X or Y.

    January 1, 2012 at 9:24 am |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
Advertisement
About this blog

The CNN Belief Blog covers the faith angles of the day's biggest stories, from breaking news to politics to entertainment, fostering a global conversation about the role of religion and belief in readers' lives. It's edited by CNN's Daniel Burke with contributions from Eric Marrapodi and CNN's worldwide news gathering team.