By Alan Miller, Special to CNN
Editor’s note: Alan Miller is Director of The New York Salon and Co-Founder of London's Old Truman Brewery. He is speaking at The Battle of Ideas at London's Barbican in October.
The increasingly common refrain that "I'm spiritual, but not religious," represents some of the most retrogressive aspects of contemporary society. The spiritual but not religious "movement" - an inappropriate term as that would suggest some collective, organizational aspect - highlights the implosion of belief that has struck at the heart of Western society.
Spiritual but not religious people are especially prevalent in the younger population in the United States, although a recent study has argued that it is not so much that people have stopped believing in God, but rather have drifted from formal institutions.
It seems that just being a part of a religious institution is nowadays associated negatively, with everything from the Religious Right to child abuse, back to the Crusades and of course with terrorism today.
Follow the CNN Belief Blog on Twitter
Those in the spiritual-but-not-religious camp are peddling the notion that by being independent - by choosing an "individual relationship" to some concept of "higher power", energy, oneness or something-or-other - they are in a deeper, more profound relationship than one that is coerced via a large institution like a church.
That attitude fits with the message we are receiving more and more that "feeling" something somehow is more pure and perhaps, more "true” than having to fit in with the doctrine, practices, rules and observations of a formal institution that are handed down to us.
The trouble is that “spiritual but not religious” offers no positive exposition or understanding or explanation of a body of belief or set of principles of any kind.
What is it, this "spiritual" identity as such? What is practiced? What is believed?
CNN’s Belief Blog: The faith angles behind the biggest stories
The accusation is often leveled that such questions betray a rigidity of outlook, all a tad doctrinaire and rather old-fashioned.
But when the contemporary fashion is for an abundance of relativist "truths" and what appears to be in the ascendancy is how one "feels" and even governments aim to have a "happiness agenda," desperate to fill a gap at the heart of civic society, then being old-fashioned may not be such a terrible accusation.
It is within the context of today's anti-big, anti-discipline, anti-challenging climate - in combination with a therapeutic turn in which everything can be resolved through addressing my inner existential being - that the spiritual but not religious outlook has flourished.
The boom in megachurches merely reflect this sidelining of serious religious study for networking, drop-in centers and positive feelings.
Those that identify themselves, in our multi-cultural, hyphenated-American world often go for a smorgasbord of pick-and-mix choices.
A bit of Yoga here, a Zen idea there, a quote from Taoism and a Kabbalah class, a bit of Sufism and maybe some Feing Shui but not generally a reading and appreciation of The Bhagavad Gita, the Karma Sutra or the Qur'an, let alone The Old or New Testament.
So what, one may ask?
Christianity has been interwoven and seminal in Western history and culture. As Harold Bloom pointed out in his book on the King James Bible, everything from the visual arts, to Bach and our canon of literature generally would not be possible without this enormously important work.
Indeed, it was through the desire to know and read the Bible that reading became a reality for the masses - an entirely radical moment that had enormous consequences for humanity.
Moreover, the spiritual but not religious reflect the "me" generation of self-obsessed, truth-is-whatever-you-feel-it-to-be thinking, where big, historic, demanding institutions that have expectations about behavior, attitudes and observance and rules are jettisoned yet nothing positive is put in replacement.
The idea of sin has always been accompanied by the sense of what one could do to improve oneself and impact the world.
Yet the spiritual-but-not-religious outlook sees the human as one that simply wants to experience "nice things" and "feel better." There is little of transformation here and nothing that points to any kind of project that can inspire or transform us.
At the heart of the spiritual but not religious attitude is an unwillingness to take a real position. Influenced by the contribution of modern science, there is a reluctance to advocate a literalist translation of the world.
But these people will not abandon their affiliation to the sense that there is "something out there," so they do not go along with a rationalist and materialistic explanation of the world, in which humans are responsible to themselves and one another for their actions - and for the future.
Theirs is a world of fence-sitting, not-knowingess, but not-trying-ness either. Take a stand, I say. Which one is it? A belief in God and Scripture or a commitment to the Enlightenment ideal of human-based knowledge, reason and action? Being spiritual but not religious avoids having to think too hard about having to decide.
The opinions expressed in this commentary are solely those of Alan Miller.
It's sad that many of the people who have previously posted comments (Karen, tbrit, bruins50, and ELast, for example) have demonstrated more intelligence and thoughtfulness than the author of this article. I can't believe this guy was paid for this crap! If I was a professor, this essay would get a "C," because it is lacking in examples and evidence, and is full of biased language. Talk about lacking discipline!
Agreed...and the author's essay is full of incorrect grammar.
"The trouble is that “spiritual but not religious” offers no positive exposition or understanding or explanation of a body of belief or set of principles of any kind."
Hey Mr. Miller, I think what you find troublesome is the adolescent mind – which is what your quote above describes. In which case you should be advocating against popularist and socialist ideals that feed that mind set. I am spiritual and not part of any religious organization because I don't like the idea of having to prostrate myself to a group intent on worshiping their organization rather than worship God. Religious organizations are akin to rival gangs in most of the world – each willing to fight and die to promote the organization (despite their religious tenets). I site the recent uprisings due to random crap posted on YouTube.
This article further drives me away from religion. And since I can't be spiritual without it seeming like a cop out to the media, and being an American have to believe everything the media says, just looks like I'm going to have to be a full fledged atheist then. Way to go jerk, you have yet again killed God.
The real question is why CNN wastes space on religion at all? It is a fraud of massive and world wide proportion and a haox to keep people down (without religion we would probably kill the rich for their crimes)
Spirituality? BS Religion? BS
all of it a waste of time, money, energy and resources that could be better spent fixing the problems we ALL have.
Major religions such as Christianity and Islam have proven to be nothing but damaging and vile to our world. I reject this notion that we have to "take a side" on the matter of a higher power. The basic truth about it all is that no matter how much we read or try to decipher life's mysteries we were never meant to have concrete proof of what put us into existence. What is the point in living if you know all the answers? I am spiritual but not religious because religion is a disease of manipulation and control. I can believe in a higher power while also believing that it was never meant for me to understand this higher power until AFTER I die.
I agree... Well stated.
And the author of this driveling piece of op-ed tripe is an 'authority' in what way again? Must I remind him that "cop out" can go both if not multiple ways; it's only defined by whichever convenient perspective a person chooses to stare and soap box any issue from.
I will take spiritual-but-not-religious over the far more common religious-but-not-spiritual any day of the week. The former implies a desire to understand and a willingness to search and think. The latter requires nothing more than doing what you are told.
Bingo Charlie !
I agree. I think you can have both though. Religion without spirit is dead. A person needs to practice their religion to see results. An example is being a Christian, but not following the commandments of Christ. "Spiritualism" without direction is confusing to me.
Spiritualism is better than organised religon. Even better than Spiritualism, Atheism.
@ truth be told. not true. never happened. it's a myth. as an atheist/humanist, i would certainly love to believe that he said that but it just didn't happen.
Quite the opposite. I've thought long and hard and want no part of organized religion. Do I believe I am accountable for my actions both to myself and others? Absolutely but I don't get that from organized religion but rather from a life full of consequences."go along with a rationalistic and materialistic explanation of the world"? there is nothing rational when it comes to pedophilia in the church, embezzlement, extra-marital affairs among both parishers and leaders of the churches. And we are living in a completely materialistic world in direct contrast to the teachings of Jesus BTW !!
Alan Miller: Have you considered that when someone says they're "Spiritual but not religious", it's not because they don't have coherent beliefs, but that they just don't want to talk about them... particularly with YOU? If you're the kind of person who insists that everything must be reduced into easily labeled boxes that you can categorize, dissect, attack, ridicule, and argue with over and over... then why would anyone want to talk with you about about their beliefs? They can tell from a mile away that, no matter what, you'll think your belief system is superior to theirs. And you'll want to waste their precious time trying to convert them to your Church of Alan's Ego.
It's easy to see that you have been brainwashed into believing that an organized religion is the truth. The original belief of Jesus was a rebellion against the Hebrews teachings. The Christians came to power by way of the Roman Empire. The Spanish then took over the Christian faith to become Catholic. The Catholics then persecuted and murdered other Christians and non-believers that would not follow their doctrine. This gave rise to the Protestants and the Muslims. We are in the middle of another rebellion to organized religion. I wish you luck in your endeavors to be one with a doctrine, instead of one with God.
There is nothing substantive in this article. The biggest argument posed against not choosing one religion to follow is that people are refusing to "take a stand." The trouble is, many of our biggest problems stem from people choosing one side or one religion and refusing to hear the other. Look at how many people die because they have taken a different "stand." Look at how useless our partisan Congress has become. I believe this author's belief that people must understand the world in unyielding absolute terms is the real danger.
I agree, just look at the picture the author posted. Looks like some pot smoking hippy on a beach as opposed to those such as myself who have a Master's degree and a good career. This article is a joke...I see why they CNN says "It's not news, it's CNN".
This article is absolute dribble. OBVIOUSLY very little research or insight has been given to even the format of words. Alan Miller should be fired purely due to ignorance and poor 'viewer' respect. WELL DONE CNN for having such a talented writer....not
So we have to believe in god to be a good person ?
Crap,. we an still be good people and believe in being
honest and kind without believing that some god watches me
every minute of everyday to judge me.
And did he take 6 days to make all this or 20 billion years?
Just live life as a good person, no reason to blame it on
some god or gods. Until proven, he is just an excuse.
( I use lowercase for god for a reason, not a mistake)
I do think the writer is missing the bigger point of belonging to a specific religion and that is the sense of community and belonging to something more important and enduring than an individual.
That is actually the problem with organized religion. People join more to gain friendship and a common belief than because they actually believe in the religion. I recently asked all my Christian friends if they believe the majority of the world is going to hell. They looked at me in confusion. I told them that is what they believe and they all said no? Then they asked their pastor and he said if you are a true Christian that is exactly what you believe as the Bible is the word of God and it clearly states good deeds alone are not enough you must also believe. Guess what, even though none of my Christian friends actually agreed with this belief they still all go to the same church simply because they did not want to lose all their friends. It's just sad.
This gentleman appears to not know what is in the hearts and minds of us that are spiritual but not religious. All he states are assumptions and wrong ones to say the least. The assumptions he makes are frankly quite disrespectful. If he expects some sort of respect, he needs to give the same.
Well, Alan. Since you believe in God and I don't, you can go to hell. Where is it your position to tell people it is a "cop out". CNN, I blame you for even letting this make it to a large stroy section!
Quite the opposite. I've thought long and hard and want to part of organized religion. Do I believe I am accountable for my actions both to myself and others? Absolutely but I don't get that from organized religion but rather from a life full of consequences."go along with a rationalistic and materialistic explanation of the world"? there is nothing rational when it comes to pedophilia in the church, embezzlement, extra-marital affairs among both parishers and leaders of the churches. And we are living in a completely materialistic world in direct contrast to the teachings of Jesus BTW !!
"I'm spiritual but not religious' is a cop-out" - Translate as "We churches can't make money off these common sense people... GAWDAMMIT!!!!
The CNN Belief Blog covers the faith angles of the day's biggest stories, from breaking news to politics to entertainment, fostering a global conversation about the role of religion and belief in readers' lives. It's edited by CNN's Daniel Burke with contributions from Eric Marrapodi and CNN's worldwide news gathering team.