home
RSS
The Gospel according to Obama
President Obama is not just a racial trailblazer, but some say a religious pioneer as well. No president has ever shared his type of Christianity, historians say. Some say he may revive a form of Christianity that once dominated America.
October 21st, 2012
06:59 AM ET

The Gospel according to Obama

By John Blake, CNN

President Barack Obama was sharing a pulpit one day with a conservative Christian leader when a revealing exchange took place.

Kansas Gov. Sam Brownback, a conservative Christian who has taken public stands against abortion and same-sex marriage, had joined Obama for an AIDS summit. They were speaking before a conservative megachurch filled with white evangelicals.

When Brownback rose to speak, he joked that he had joined Obama earlier at an NAACP meeting where Obama was treated like Elvis and he was virtually ignored. Turning to Obama, a smiling Brownback said, “Welcome to my house!”

The audience exploded with laughter and applause. Obama rose, walked before the congregation and then declared:

“There is one thing I have to say, Sam. This is my house, too. This is God’s house.”

Historians may remember Obama as the nation’s first black president, but he’s also a religious pioneer. He’s not only changed people’s perception of who can be president, some scholars and pastors say, but he’s also expanding the definition of who can be a Christian by challenging the religious right’s domination of the national stage.

When Obama invoked Jesus to support same-sex marriage, framed health care as a moral imperative to care for “the least of these,’’ and once urged people to read their Bible but just not literally, he was invoking another Christian tradition that once dominated American public life so much that it gave the nation its first megachurches, historians say.

“Barack Obama has referred to his faith more times than most presidents ever have, but for many it’s the wrong kind of faith,” says Jim Wallis, head of Sojourners, an evangelical activist group based in Washington that focuses on poverty and social justice issues.

Follow the CNN Belief Blog on Twitter

“It is not the faith of the religious right. It’s about things that they don’t talk about. It’s about how the Bible is full of God’s clear instruction to care for the poor.”

Some see a 'different' kind of Christian

Obama is a progressive Christian who blends the emotional fire of the African-American church, the ecumenical outlook of contemporary Protestantism, and the activism of the Social Gospel, a late 19th-century movement whose leaders faulted American churches for focusing too much on personal salvation while ignoring the conditions that led to pervasive poverty.

No other president has shared the hybrid faith that Obama displays, says Diana Butler Bass, a historian and author of “Christianity after Religion.”

“The kind of faith that Obama articulates is not the sort of Christianity that’s understood by the media or by a large swath of Christians in the U.S.,” says Bass, a progressive Christian. “He’s a different kind of Christian, and the media and the public awareness needs to reawaken to that fact.”

Some Christians, however, still see Obama as the “other.” He doesn’t act or talk like other Christians, says the Rev. Gary Cass, a conservative Christian president of the Christian Anti-Defamation Commission.

“I just don’t see or hear in his accounts the kind of things that I’ve heard as a minister for over 25 years coming from the mouths of people who have genuinely converted to Christianity,” says Cass, pastor of Christ Church in San Diego.

Cass says he’s never heard Obama say he’s “born-again.” There’s no emotional conversion story to hang onto.

Obama talks about his faith and attends church, but Cass says that doesn’t mean he’s a Christian.

“Joining a church doesn’t mean you’re a Christian. “You can put me in the garage, but that doesn’t turn me into a car.”

The origins of Obama’s faith

The suspicion about Obama’s faith may seem odd at first because he’s written and spoken so much about his spiritual evolution in his two autobiographies, “Dreams of my Father” and “The Audacity of Hope.” Other books, like “The Faith of Obama” by Stephen Mansfield, also explore Obama’s beliefs.

The 1925 “Monkey” trial of John Scopes, a high school biology teacher who taught evolution, drove fundamentalists underground, some say.

Mansfield says Obama is the first president who wasn’t raised in a Christian home. Obama’s mother was an atheist and his grandparents were religious skeptics (Obama’s family has challenged the description of his mother as an atheist. Obama called her “the most spiritually awakened” person he’d ever known, and his sister called their mother an agnostic).

CNN’s Belief Blog: The faith angles behind the biggest stories

Mansfield called Obama’s boyhood a “religious swirl.  He was exposed to Catholicism, Islam, and strains of Hinduism and Buddhism while growing up in Indonesia during the 1960s.

“In our household, the Bible, the Koran and the Bhagavad Gita sat on the shelf alongside books of Greek and Norse and African mythology,” Obama said in Mansfield’s book. “On Easter or Christmas Day, my mother might drag me to church, just as she dragged me to the Buddhist temple, the Chinese New Year celebration, the Shinto shrine, and ancient Hawaiian burial sites.”

Obama became a Christian while he was a community organizer in Chicago. He joined a predominantly black United Church of Christ. The UCC became the first mainline Protestant denomination to officially support same-sex marriage in 2005.

Obama’s faith showed many of the elements of a liberal Protestant church: an emphasis on the separation of church and state, religious tolerance and the refusal to embrace a literal reading of the Bible.

In a 2006 speech before a Sojourners meeting, Obama talked about his approach to the Bible:

“Which passages of Scripture should guide our public policy? Should we go with Leviticus, which suggests slavery is OK and that eating shellfish is abomination? How about Deuteronomy, which suggests stoning your child if he strays from the faith? Or should we just stick to the Sermon on the Mount – a passage that is so radical that it’s doubtful that our own Defense Department would survive its application?”

When many people think of Obama’s religious experience in Chicago, though, they cite his exposure to the angry sermons of the Rev. Jeremiah Wright and “black liberation theology,” a movement that emerged in the late 1960s and blended the Social Gospel with the black power movement.

Bass, the church historian, says another black pastor shaped Obama’s theology more: the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr.

He attended liberal Protestant seminaries where he learned about the Social Gospel’s concern for the entire person, soul and body.

Obama has reached out to evangelical leaders like Rick Warren, seen here praying at Obama’s inauguration, but many still doubt his faith.

King once wrote that “any religion that professes to be concerned about the souls of men and is not concerned about the slums that damn them, the economic conditions that strangle them …is a spiritually moribund religion awaiting burial.”

But King and the black church also fused the Social Gospel with an emotional fervor missing from white Protestant churches, Bass says. Other presidents like Franklin Roosevelt and Woodrow Wilson were influenced by the Social Gospel, but they weren’t shaped by the black church.

“This is the first time we’re hearing the Social Gospel from the perspective of the black church from the Oval Office. It makes it warmer, more emotive, more communal," Bass says. "There is less fear of linking the Social Gospel with the stories of the Bible, especially the stories of Exodus and Jesus’ healings.”

The emphasis on community uplift - not individual attainment - may strike some Americans as socialist. But the emphasis on community is part of King’s “Beloved Community,” Bass says.

King once wrote that all people are caught up in an “inescapable network of mutuality… I can never be what I ought to be until you are allowed to be what you ought to be.”

“When I listen to Obama, I don’t hear communism, I hear the Beloved Community,” Bass says. “But a lot of white Americans don’t hear that because they never sat in those churches and heard it over and over again. It’s the whole theology that motivated MLK and the civil rights movement.”

Obama is not a Christian, some think

For some, Obama’s actions in the Oval Office seem to contradict Christianity.

Jesus was nonviolent. Obama has ramped up drone attacks in Afghanistan that have not only removed terrorists, but killed civilians.

The Bible talks about the sanctity of marriage between a man and a woman. Obama invoked Jesus when he came out in support of same-sex marriage. “The thing at root that we think about is, not only Christ sacrificing himself on our behalf, but it’s also the Golden Rule," Obama told ABC News during his announcement.

Jesus talked about helping the poor. But he never said anything about creating a massive health care law that taxed the rich to help the poor, some Christians argue.

But Wallis of Sojourners says Obama’s push for health care was a supreme example of Christian faith.

A situation where 50 million Americans don’t have health insurance is “a fundamental Christian problem,” Wallis says.

“Health is such a Gospel issue. Jesus was involved in healing all the time, and to have some people excluded from health care because they lack wealth is a fundamental Christian contradiction.”

Wallis has been one of the most persistent defenders of Obama’s faith. But no matter how much Scripture he and others cite, doubts about Obama’s faith have followed him throughout his political career.

Focus on the Family founder James Dobson once said that Obama distorted the traditional understanding of the Bible “to fit his own world, his own confused theology.” The Rev. Franklin Graham, the son of Billy Graham, publicly questioned Obama’s faith, then later apologized.

Conservative Christian books and websites are filled with stories of Obama allegedly trying to suppress the nation’s Christian heritage.

The Rev. Steven Andrew, author of “Making a Strong Nation,” says Obama is trying to change the national motto from “In God we Trust” to “Out of Many, One,” and he’s ordered the Pentagon to remove biblical verses from its daily report.

“That’s the most serious thing someone can do to a nation, trying to separate a nation from God,” he says. “He seems to be trying to change the Christian laws our Founding Fathers made.”

Andrew says Obama is actually an enemy of Christianity. In his book, Andrew argues that the Founding Fathers were Christians who created a “covenant Christian nation” and calls for a “national repentance.”

“I think he’s an anti-Christ,” Andrew says.  Cass, of the Christian Anti-Defamation Commission, says Obama’s emphasis on helping the poor through social justice isn’t Christianity.

Christians who talk about “social justice” are often practicing “warmed-over Marxism,” Cass says.

“Do I believe in caring for the poor and oppressed? Yes. But you don’t do it along the lines of communistic redistributing.”

Obama’s support of same-sex marriage and abortion rights also disqualifies him from being a Christian, Cass says.

“It’s the most pro-abortion administration in the history of America.  On every social issue – the sanctity of life and of marriage between men and women – Obama is on the wrong side of every moral issue,” he says.

He says a progressive Christian is a contradiction.

“No Christian says I believe in Jesus Christ and I reject the Bible,” Cass says. “These progressives who say they’re Christians are liars. They’re using Christianity as a guise to advance their own agenda.”

Cass says he doesn’t know what Obama believes.

“He’s conflicted,” Cass says. “He has Muslim sympathies from his upbringing."

How progressive Christianity lost the public square

There was a time when Obama’s brand of Christianity would have been understood by millions of Americans, historians say.

Obama along with first lady Michelle Obama and their daughters Malia and Sasha leave church after attending a Sunday prayer service.

The Social Gospel and progressive Protestantism dominated the American religious square from the end of the 19th century up to the 1960s. At times, the traditions blended together so seamlessly that it was hard to tell the difference.

The Social Gospel rose out of the excesses of the Gilded Age in the 1880s, when urban poverty spread across America as immigrants crammed into filthy slums to work long hours in unsafe conditions.

Walter Rauschenbusch, a Baptist pastor in a New York slum, urged the church to take “social sins” as seriously as they took individual vices. Churches began feeding the poor and fighting against other social ills.

“The notion that religious people should be about feeding the poor and helping the homeless is a carryover of the Social Gospel,” says Charles Kammer, a religion professor at Wooster College in Ohio. The Social Gospel was adopted by many Protestant churches in the late 19th and early 20th century, says Bass, the church historian. Some of the Social Gospel churches grew popular because they provided the poor with everything from English classes to sewing instructions and basketball leagues.

“The first American megachurches were liberal, Social Gospel urban churches,” Bass says.

The Social Gospel, though, sparked a backlash from a group of pastors during World War I. They were called fundamentalists. They published a pamphlet listing the “fundamentals of the faith:” Biblical inerrancy, the virgin birth, Adam and Eve.

But the fundamentalists lost the battle for public opinion during the “Scopes Monkey Trial” in 1925. John Scopes, a high school science teacher, was tried for violating a Tennessee law that prohibited the teaching of evolution.

Though Scopes lost, fundamentalist Christians were mocked in the press as “anti-intellectual rubes,” and a number of states suspended pending legislation that would have made teaching evolution illegal, says David Felten, author of “Living the Questions: The Wisdom of Progressive Christianity.”

The trial drove fundamentalists underground where they created a subculture, their own media networks, seminaries and megachurches, he says.

That subculture thrives today, Felten says, and has infiltrated the political arena. It has created an “alternative intellectual universe” that denies science, rational thought – and any beliefs that violate their definition of being a Christian, Felten says.

“They have millions of adherents who believe in a literal six day creation and a literal Adam and Eve – so it’s not a stretch to believe that President Obama is a Kenyan-born secret Muslim bent on destroying the country,” Felten says.

Progressive Christians eventually lost the messaging wars to this fundamentalist subculture, Bass says. Their nuanced view of faith couldn’t compete with the “spiritual triumphalism” of conservatives.

“If you get up and say we’re right and we have the truth, then you have a powerful public message,” she says. “They have a theological advantage in the public discourse. It’s comforting to have things clear, to have things black and white.”

The result today is that the Protestant tradition that shapes much of Obama’s Christianity is fading from public view.

The share of Protestant Christians in the United States has dropped below 50% of the population, according to a recent survey by the Pew Forum on Religion and Public Life.

White mainline Protestants make up only 15% of the nation’s population, the survey revealed. The study also found that the fastest growing "religious group" in the country is people who are not affiliated with any religion.

Another generation of Christians, though, may bring a new version of progressive Christianity back.

The lines between younger conservative Christians and progressives are blurring, says Marcia Pally, author of “The New Evangelicals: Expanding the Vision of the Common Good.”

Pally spent six years traveling across America to interview evangelicals. She says her research revealed that more than 60% of young evangelicals support more governmental programs to aid the needy, as well as more emphasis on economic justice and environmental protection issues.

“What’s interesting is that these values, associated with Obama and the black Protestant tradition are now also the values of a growing number of white evangelicals,” she says.

Her perspective suggests that Obama’s faith may be treated by history in two ways:

He could be seen as the last embodiment of a progressive version of Christianity that went obsolete.

Or he could be seen as a leader who helped resurrect a dying brand of Christianity for a new generation.

- CNN Writer

Filed under: 2012 Election • Atheism • Barack Obama • Belief • Bible • Books • Christianity • Church • Courts • Creationism • Culture & Science • Culture wars • Evolution • evolvution • Faith • Fundamentalism • Gay marriage • Gay rights • God • History • Homosexuality • Interfaith issues • Obama • Protestant • Religious liberty • Same-sex marriage • Schools • Science

soundoff (8,626 Responses)
  1. us_1776

    GOP is *NOT* A FISCAL CONSERVATIVE PARTY

    GOP is ONLY A SOCIAL CONSERVATIVE PARTY

    GOP is responsible for 3/4 or 12T of our 16T debt.

    30 years of GOP WARS-FOR-PROFIT (their profit)
    Multi-trillion StarWars (SDI)
    Multi-trillion Gulf War
    Multi-trillion Afghan War
    Multi-trillion Iraq War
    30 years of GOP UNFUNDED PROGRAM after UNFUNDED PROGRAM
    Medicare Part D (senior vote grabber)
    Dept. of Homeland Suckurity
    The hated TSA
    No Child
    Bush's TARP Bailout

    --–
    DEMS are A FISCAL CONSERVATIVE PARTY

    DEMS are A SOCIALLY PROGRESSIVE PARTY

    If you value fiscal conservatism then you need to

    Vote DEMOCRATIC for a country that works for ALL Americans.

    .

    October 21, 2012 at 12:13 pm |
    • us_1776

      Obama has reigned in out-of-control GOP spending:

      Reagan 1st term 6.7%
      Reagan 2nd term 4.9%
      Bush I only term 5.4%
      Clinton 1st term 3.2%
      Clinton 2nd term 3.9%
      Bush II 1st term 7.3%
      Bush II 2nd term 8.1%
      Obama 1st term 1.4%

      Government spending is rising at 1.4% per annum average under Obama, the lowest at almost any time in the last 60 years.

      Source, Wall Street Journal.

      .

      October 21, 2012 at 12:14 pm |
    • therealpeace2all

      @us_1776

      Yes... well said.

      Peace...

      October 21, 2012 at 12:17 pm |
    • Bob Bales

      If Obama has reigned in out-of-control spending, why is the deficit rising faster than ever?

      October 21, 2012 at 2:17 pm |
  2. Chris

    Doesn't the Bible teach that pride is a sin? From the opening anecdote it sounds like Gov. Brownback should re-read that section again

    October 21, 2012 at 12:13 pm |
  3. utter nonsense

    you just lost another reader, what a horrible ariticle, and pure rubbish

    October 21, 2012 at 12:12 pm |
  4. BlatantAtheist

    I'll be impressed once we have a president with no religion.

    October 21, 2012 at 12:12 pm |
  5. NBW

    What kind of headline is this? I have come to expect pandering from Fox, but hoped CNN was above this kind of reporting. Seems like they are reaching the bottom of the barrel in there journalistic skill set.

    October 21, 2012 at 12:12 pm |
  6. Pipsmom06

    And for the record, bowing to a monarch is a social and political gesture. It has nothing to do with ones religion.

    October 21, 2012 at 12:11 pm |
  7. agnostic leaning toward atheist

    I would worry more about the jewish people acting in the best interest of another country over ours. if I was president. I think think many before him warned of the same.

    October 21, 2012 at 12:11 pm |
    • agnostic leaning toward atheist

      More specifically the ones in our congress, and/or paying off our congress. and who gets the interest on $16 Trillion. and how is our congress related to or paid off by the same? who benefits?

      October 21, 2012 at 12:13 pm |
  8. cnnsucks

    you just lost another reader, what a horrible ariticle, and pure rubbish

    October 21, 2012 at 12:11 pm |
  9. Mjw

    Obama is a Christian. The fundamentalists don't like that fact. So, the fundamentalists are voting for a member of a cult, Romney. It is the fundamentalists that call Mormonism a cult.

    October 21, 2012 at 12:11 pm |
  10. Joe the Plumber Butt

    More humans have been killed by other humans in the name of Christianity than by any other cause. Fact. Period.

    October 21, 2012 at 12:11 pm |
  11. Jeb

    The single greatest accomplishment of the conservative movement in the U.S. has been to convince millions of weak minded individuals that selfishness, greed, and hatred for those who are less fortunate, are good "Christian" values.

    October 21, 2012 at 12:11 pm |
    • Bob Bales

      Selfishness, greed, and hatred for those who are less fortunate are neither Christian values nor conservative values. For instance, studies have shown that evangelical Christians, a.k.a the "religious right," tend to give more to charity than do others

      October 21, 2012 at 2:24 pm |
  12. LakeRat1

    I believe I have a simple, accurate method of determining a "bad" Christian: Anyone who claims to have any authority to criticize anyone else's Cristianity. They have obviously forgotten "Judge not, lest ye be judged" (I hope I got that correct, I do not subscribe to any organized religion). However, I am willing to risk the "lest ye be judged" concequence, by saying that I think the wack jobs that wish to dominate society by using Christianity are not only "bad Christians" but, just plain "bad people". It boggles my mind that they get political traction, just by acting like they are some kind of experts on religion. The next time any one of them complains about somebody interfering with their religious freedom, think about all of the ways THEY are interfering with everyone else's freedom.

    October 21, 2012 at 12:11 pm |
  13. robyn ryan

    Mindless pandering is not journalism.

    October 21, 2012 at 12:11 pm |
  14. lee

    it is our responsibility to give to the poor. Education and healthcare in the wealthiest country for the poor should be obvious.

    October 21, 2012 at 12:10 pm |
  15. Tom Barker

    This is on top of Ari Velshi starting his balanced assessment of the two candidates last Sunday by referencing and showing 60 seconds from the "2016" hit-job movie. A totally fact-free expose. I am now truly done with your pathetic false-equivalencies and thumb on the scales reporting. Disgusting. I'm done with CNN – forever. We all kow that the night of the long knives awaits many of you after the election because your ratings are in the tank. Trying to be FOX wont save you. It cant come soon enough.

    October 21, 2012 at 12:10 pm |
  16. 1word

    Obama beliefs cannot change who you are in Christ. We all will find out when we are judged if we lived our life according to Gods Will. Obama has some beliefs I don't agree with but he also has some that Romney doesn't have. God is for caring for all people, that means we have to sacrifice ourselves to make other people feel comfortable. It's important that we start with Love first, and then we can start relaying what God does not approve of.

    October 21, 2012 at 12:10 pm |
  17. peter

    Can we also hear anything about Mitt Romney and Mormonism?

    October 21, 2012 at 12:09 pm |
    • old golfer

      Mitt Romney is on TV every day. The book of Mormon is easily available to anyone. Probably posted on the internet, if you choose to look and read it.

      October 21, 2012 at 12:20 pm |
  18. Bostontola

    Religions exploit humans need to belong to a group. They teach members that their way and they are superior. God loves them and will smite (love that word) all others. It's mass delusion siren's song.

    The funny thing is, it works. Religions dominate. A strong group of people, even bonded by a colossal lie, dominates a loosely bonded group.

    October 21, 2012 at 12:09 pm |
  19. cnn sucks

    cnn you just lost another reader, what a horrible ariticle, and pure rubbish

    October 21, 2012 at 12:09 pm |
  20. PamG

    A candidate's religious beliefs should not be debated. But, since some have opened the door, I don't classify Mormons as true Christians. Get this: an angel appears and advocates multiple wives (contradicts Jesus in the New Testament), then reappears advocating only one wife (ironically when Utah bans multiple wife "marriage"). Then there is the Mormon belief in the afterlife–a good man becomes god of his own planet and begets more children. No wonder the Mormons don't follow the traditional bible–their book is the Book of Mormon. If you believe Jesus in the New Testament of your bible, this is absolutely a contradiction of Christian belief. According to the words of Jesus, when we die, we will be judged, and rewarded by heaven or punished in hell. Funny, Jesus must have forgotten to tell men they would get to be god of their own planet and procreate again. If any Christian truly believes this, I have got a bridge to sell you. And people have the nerve to question a Protestant mainstream Obama?

    October 21, 2012 at 12:09 pm |
    • BlatantAtheist

      If ANYONE truly believes ANY of this, I've got a bridge to see you to mythical land.

      October 21, 2012 at 12:15 pm |
    • BlatantAtheist

      If ANYONE truly believes ANY of this, I've got a bridge to sell you to mythical land.

      October 21, 2012 at 12:15 pm |
    • patricia pratt

      That was excellent! I do think about all the Christians backing Romney: where are their Christian convictions???

      October 21, 2012 at 12:17 pm |
    • old golfer

      So, you then believe the snake, upright walking and having a tet-a-tet with Evie in the garden. You then believe the ark story I guess. How about the virgin birth? A celibate man, Jesus? God stopping all the planets so Joshua could murder more people by the day being made longer. The list is long, but to each his own. Look into your own book before you get critical of the other books. Or maybe, just live your life correct without any of the religious books. God gave man reason. Man gave man religion.

      October 21, 2012 at 12:18 pm |
    • Bob Bales

      old golfer: Christians believe that God created the universe. Which of the things that you poke fun at would be impossible for a God capable of creating the universe?

      October 21, 2012 at 2:30 pm |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177

Post a comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Advertisement
About this blog

The CNN Belief Blog covers the faith angles of the day's biggest stories, from breaking news to politics to entertainment, fostering a global conversation about the role of religion and belief in readers' lives. It's edited by CNN's Daniel Burke with contributions from Eric Marrapodi and CNN's worldwide news gathering team.