By Eric Marrapodi, CNN Belief Blog Editor
(CNN)–In the face of withering criticism over a sermon he apparently delivered on homosexuality in the 1990s, the Rev. Louie Giglio has withdrawn from giving the benediction at President Barack Obama's inauguration.
Giglio informed inauguration officials Thursday morning of his decision to withdraw from the ceremony, an inauguration official told CNN.
"I am honored to have been invited by the president to give the benediction at the upcoming inauguration on January 21," Giglio said in a statement delivered to the White House and the Presidential Inaugural Committee. "Though the president and I do not agree on every issue, we have fashioned a friendship around common goals and ideals, most notably, ending slavery in all its forms."
"Due to a message of mine that has surfaced from 15-20 years ago, it is likely that my participation, and the prayer I would offer, will be dwarfed by those seeking to make their agenda a focal point of the inauguration. Clearly, speaking on this issue has not been in the range of my priorities in the past fifteen years. Instead, my aim has been to call people to ultimate significance as we make much of Jesus Christ."
Follow the CNN Belief Blog on Twitter
Giglio, a pastor and the leader of the Passion Movement, was chosen to deliver the benediction because he's a "powerful voice for ending human trafficking and global sex slavery" and due to his work in mobilizing young people in that effort, an inauguration official said earlier in the week when the reverend's selection was first announced.
Criticism over the selection swirled after the liberal website Think Progress posted a sermon that it said Giglio gave in the mid-1990s, a speech the site called "vehemently anti-gay."
A spokeswoman for the Presidential Inaugural Committee said the committee was "not aware of Pastor Giglio's past comments at the time of his selection and they don't reflect our desire to celebrate the strength and diversity of our country at this Inaugural."
"As we now work to select someone to deliver the benediction, we will ensure their beliefs reflect this administration's vision of inclusion and acceptance for all Americans," said PIC spokeswoman Addie Whisenant.
In an audio copy of the sermon posted on the Think Progress website, a voice identified as that of Giglio's called homosexuality a sin. "That's God's voice. If you want to hear God's voice, that is his voice to this issue of homosexuality. It is not ambiguous and unclear. It is very clear."
"If you look at the counsel of the word of God, Old Testament, New Testament, you come quickly to the conclusion that homosexuality is not an alternate lifestyle... homosexuality is not just a sexual preference, homosexuality is not gay, but homosexuality is sin. It is sin in the eyes of God, and it is sin according to the word of God."
The recording continues: "The only way out of a homosexual lifestyle, the only way out of a relationship that has been ingrained over years of time, is through the healing power of Jesus."
CNN’s Belief Blog: The faith angles behind the biggest stories
"We've got to say to the homosexuals, the same thing that I say to you and that you would say to me... it's not easy to change, but it is possible to change," he can also be heard saying during the sermon.
Giglio is a rising voice in evangelical Christianity. Last week, the Passion conference, which he founded, wrapped up its annual event for college students in Atlanta, with more than 60,000 students attending and vowing to end global slavery. They raised $3 million for charities that work to stop slavery and aid its victims.
Giglio said Thursday that he and his team don't feel "it best serves the core message and goals we are seeking to accomplish to be in a fight on an issue not of our choosing; thus I respectfully withdraw my acceptance of the president's invitation."
"I will continue to pray regularly for the president, and urge the nation to do so. I will most certainly pray for him on Inauguration Day," Giglio's statement to the White House continued.
"Our nation is deeply divided and hurting, and more than ever need God's grace and mercy in our time of need," it concluded.
Giglio took to his church blog Thursday to further explain his position to his congregants at Passion City Church in Atlanta.
"The issue of homosexuality (which a particular message of mine some 20 years ago addressed) is one of the most difficult our nation will navigate. However, individuals' rights of freedom, and the collective right to hold differing views on any subject is a critical balance we, as a people, must recover and preserve," he wrote.
He asserted that his main goal as a pastor was to love people.
"I'm confident that anyone who knows me or has listened to the multitude of messages I have given in the last decade would most likely conclude that I am not easily characterized as being opposed to people - any people. Rather, I am constantly seeking to understand where all people are coming from and how to best serve them as I point them to Jesus."
Chad Griffin, president of the Human Rights Campaign, said Giglio's decision to withdraw was the right one.
"Participants in the inaugural festivities should unite rather than divide. Choosing an affirming and fair-minded voice as his replacement would be in keeping with the tone the president wants to set for his inaugural," Griffin said in a statement.
Giglio represents a new type of evangelical leader who "doesn't like to get involved in the culture war because it blurs the larger points he wants to make," said Michael Cromartie, the vice president of the Ethics and Public Policy Center in Washington.
"What I want to remind his critics is he's not being named to a Cabinet position," Cromartie said. "He was being asked to deliver a prayer. All sorts of people deliver prayers who we don't agree with on a number of issues."
"It's unfortunate that this kind of political correctness doesn't allow people who are doing great work to pray at inauguration," he added.
CNN's Athena Jones contributed to this report
God is on your side.
Gay coitus and gay marriage are at cross purposes with the Holy Bible and God's
teaching in the Jewish Torah and the Islamic Koran.
They can't all be wrong...when they are all on the same page on this one.
Go Giglio..you stand up against slavery...while the gays enslave themsleves in sin.
Shame on you Obama! You of all people should no better!
People like Douglas always remind me how crazy and heartless religious people are.
douglas: how fvcking arrogant can you be to claim to know the mind of god?
"while the gays enslave themsleves in sin."
No, they don't. The scriptures actually say nothing about homosexuality as a psychosexual orientation. Our understandings of sexual orientation are distinctly modern ones that were not present in the minds of Scripture writers. A few passages of Scripture (seven at the most) object to certain types of same-sex expressions or acts. The particular acts in question, however, are sexual expressions which are exploitative, oppressive, commercialized, or offensive to ancient purity rituals. There is no Scriptural guidance for same-sex relationships which are loving and mutually respecting. Guidelines for these relationships should come from the same general Scriptural norms that apply to heterosexual relationships.
Here is another story on belief net "Obama to swear-in on a stack of historic Bibles."
Now if believing h0m0se x u ality is sinful and wrong...doesn't it stand to reason the bible could not be included because it does not foster inclusion? Obama no more believes the bible is true than any other atheist. It amazes me they act so contradictory... and people actually believe he is a Christian.
the only thing that would top this news is if Giglio came out of his closet ;)
Well, he DOES look kinda gay...
Are we not a nation that has become double minded. We claim to believe in God but we despise his Word when it interferes with our lusts. Did not God say a double minded man is unstable in all of his ways. I can find no better description of the state of our nation today. Unstable.
Being "unstable" is when hypocrites pick on other people while ignoring that they have plenty of failures themselves.
This "hypocrite" stuff gets trotted out a LOT. So lemme ask you: since everyone has "plenty of failures themselves", by your (apparent?) logic, no one should criticize anyone for anything. Am I right? But what I actually see you (and most of the anti-christians here) saying is that CHRISTIANS shouldn't criticize anyone for anything.
The reason I ask, is that I see a ton of criticizing going on here, across the board, but it's pretty much solely the Christians who get it thrown in their faces. Seems to me that, well, that's kinda hypocritical...
You got that completely right AAllen...it is unbelievable.
Jesus said that anyone who divorces and remarries commits adultery unless the previous spouse was already an adulterer.
How many Christians say such people in their families and churches should divorce and change their ways or go to hell?
The Bible says that incense is an abomination. How many Christians pick on the so-called Three Wise Men for bringing the "gift of the Magi", which was gold and TWO ABOMINATIONS?
The Bible says that women should never teach men. How many Christians follow that?
Ask any Christians about these "sins" and the don't want to talk about them. It's more fun for the HYPOCRITES to pick on gays.
Hey Observer! If Christians didn't do any of the things you mentioned, and they were against hom-ose-xuality, i'm pretty sure you would still find something to fault them for. Because you don't agree with their position on hom-ose-xuality. What it comes down to is they think something is wrong, and you disagree with them on it. Someone here, earlier, stated that hom-ose-xuality has been around since mankind first stood up on two legs (or something like that.) What that person didn't mention is that this is the first time in recorded history that hom-ose-xuality has been actively encouraged. So. Say, just for argument's sake, that there IS nothing wrong with hom-ose-xuality (from a societal, or a psychological, or an evolutionary standpoint). Just as there is, in theory, nothing wrong with drug addi-ction, or alcoholism, or inc-est (adult, consentual incest) or best-iality or necr-ophilia. Really, when it comes right down to it, there isn't. If a drug addi-ct or an alcoholic or a bes-stophile or necr-ophile or ince-stophile or whatever can function in society, hold a job and pay taxes and start a family, there's nothing wrong with it, right? But what if drug addi-ction (or my other examples), instead of merely being tolerated by society, was actively encouraged? And there were, for example, "drug-addi-ction-positive" tv shows, and positive top 40 pop songs on the radio about it, and movie af-ter movie af-ter movie extolling the virtues of the drug-addi-ct lifestyle? And it were discussed in grade scho-ol as a legitimate lifestyle, and shown in a positive light in scho-ol textbooks. What then?
Wouldn't any reasonable person think "hey now, let's rethink this stuff. Tolerance is one thing, but acceptance and encouragement is another"?
This, i think is what we're starting to see now. Things are getting a bit out of hand, and the Reps/Cons/Christians are the ones seeing it and saying "whoa". Cuz no one else is...
This is a secular nation. This allows people of all faiths to live together without fear of persecution. We are protected by the Const.itution. Therefore, your statements really only apply to the christian portion of the population.
aallen: perhaps america is not turning away from god as much as it is tuning away from YOUR verson of god
What was controversial about what he said? The truth will set you free.
"The only way out of a hom0s-xual lifestyle, the only way out of a relationship that has been ingrained over years of time, is through the healing power of Jesus."
How did the Big O get all mixed up with gay Wrights, anyway?
Rev. Wright's not gay, but expect you didn't know that.
I wonder if any of Giglio's critics have taken time to listen to the man. I think you would find a very genuine, loving person. Just sayin.
I'm sure he's great, as long as you weren't born gay. Then he will fight to take away your rights.
Despite the fact the speech was made 15 or so years ago, Giglio has apparently not recanted his ignorant tirade. I don't find much that is loving about a man who advocates treating fellow humans like second class citizens, just because they were born different than him.
Values are thrown out of the window and will get worse now that Obama and his Liberals are back in power. Pastors and men of God should stand up and speak out, This is getting worse and worse. OMG, God help America
Three Republicans said they were told by God to run and lost bad.
Four years ago Palin said God's will would be done.
Why don't you believe other believers?
According to your book of magic and fairytales, this is all part of God's plan. In Revelations, all of these things must come to pass so that God will may be done. Therefore, we humans are nothing more than puppets in His play, with our scripts, behaviors, and actions already determined.
Does that make you feel better to know that the destruction of our world is part of God's plan? If not, then perhaps you should choose to believe a more loving god, because your god is NOT a god of love, at least based upon your babble (bible).
Yes, Wanda you said that right!
Yeah. That liberal agenda is terrible, what with the poor getting fed and the sick getting aid. These are not conservative christian values. Acquiring wealth and trying to legislate discrimination - now these are conservative christian values.
values? like equality?
What value is getting thrown out? love? equality?
oh, I see, bigotry and prejudice and intolerance are your values. I choose love (i.e. I choose to follow Jesus and His law of love).
Jesus states "All men will hate you because of me, but he who stands firm to the end will be saved" Matt 10:22
stand firm and don't give in to those that deceive.
God Bless you Louis Giglio!
You think that we're somehow living in the end times because Christians are being persecuted? Christians are not the only religious people who have been persecuted over the centuries. Catholics partook in religious cleansing during the crusades by attempting to erradicate the Muslims, so Christians are not exclusive.
Christians have been persecuted since their inception, and humans have been at war with each other since the time of our neanderthal ancestors. How are the Revelation stories relevant? They're stating what has been occurring since before humans became civilized.
proudatheist-There are a great many christians who think we are living in the end times–I can prove to them that their theology has already be proven wrong through math–I am talking about the kirk cameron left behind types
The "left behind" Christians are the only ones of which I know. What math is this of which you speak? I'd like to know about it.
Do you have a domain name for a website that explains the math?
proudatheist–That israel existing today has to do with the return of christ-"the olive tree" This generation shall not pass away until these things are fulfilled-1948? nah ill give them 1967–20 years is a generation –always has been always will be–but ok 40 years-2007 has passed–they will keep on pushing the generation up and up
Jesus christ may or may not return–but it has nothing to do with israel existing or not existing
The Bible also says that "evil will be good, and good will be evil", which is very much the case today.
What's wrong iwth evil? God bragged that he does it.
Jesus states, "love your neighbor as yourself." According to Him, that is the second greatest commandment. Love is incompatible with the bigotry and prejudice and intolerance esposed by giglio.
Let's see ... Hagel can make anti-gay statements, but Giglio can't.
Oh .. okay.
Whats wrong with hagel? He is a patriot
Ah – has Hagel been called to lead a spiritual message for the President's next term?
Hagel apologized, stated those views are not his current views, and he was not selected to lead an important prayer.
THREE TIMES I POSTED MY COMMENTS AND THEY HAVE NOT POSTED. YOU CAN HAVE PEOPLE THAT SWEAR AND USE EXTREME LANGUAGE AGAINST GOD AND POSTED THEIR COMMENTS, BUT WHEN IT COMES TIME TO POST COMMENTS ABOUT PEOPLE THAT TELL THE TRUTH THAT IS WRITTEN IN THE BIBLE YOU WON'T PUBLISH. SHAME ON YOU CNN.
Go ahead. We are waiting.
You probably had a word like "const.itution" which the automatic word filter will not allow because of the word "t.it" in the middle. Or perhaps a word like "va.gue" because CNN thinks that any time someone writes the letters "v" "a" and "g" in a row, they must be spelling the word "va.gina."
Of course, it could be a conspiracy by CNN to keep one person out of 7 billion from posting.
Or maybe god doesn't like caps lock.
I'M SORRY, LUKE150, BUT "GOD" IS AN ELEMENT OF MYTHOLOGY, THEREFORE YOUR ASSERTION IS UNFOUNDED. USING MY IDIOMATIC EXPRESSION EQUIVALENCY MODULE (IEE), THE EXPRESSION THAT BEST MATCHES THE DEGREE TO WHICH YOUR ASSERTION MAY REPRESENT A TRUTH IS: "TOTAL FAIL".
Just because something is written within the bible doesn't make it true. The bible was written over 2,000 years ago, in a dessert in the Middle East, and the gospels weren't even written until about 70 years after Christ's alleged death. How is the bible a reliable source of truth when there are nonsensical stories contained within it (e.g. creationism story of Genesis, Noah's Ark, the story of Moses, the story of Job)???
Just because the bible claims that the bible is God's word doesn't mean that God exists or that the bible is God's word. The bible's over 2,000 years old, and it hasn't been revised or updated to take out all of the genocide, infanticide, slavery, misogyny, slave beating, stonings, and other hateful messages contained within it.
Instead of reading the bible, why don't you read a book of science? You can learn far more from a science book than the bible.
It could be a user problem since you apparently don't know where the caps lock key is for toggling..
Pridy, did you make up your own great commission? That's just copyin'.
fuck you and fuck your invisible baby-massacreing buddy
what's this: "massacreing " ? are they putting mascara on babies now?
Yep, let's all make fun of LUKE150 for getting understandably frustrated with the incredibly stupid profanity filter, which he hand no prior knowledge of, because he's (apparently?) new here and trying to make a one-time post instead of hanging out on the CNN Belief blog for months and Months and MONTHS at a time, bullying and ridiculing every comment from every Christian that comes along. Like many of you.
You guys are doing a bang-up job. Keep up the good work.
I WAS REALLY MORE MAKING FUN OF CNN BUT OK YEAH THAT'S A GREAT POINT SO MANY ATHEISTS ARE ON HERE ALL THE TIME MAKING FUN OF ALLLLLL THE CHRISTIAN COMMENTS EXCEPT FOR SOME OF THE TIME WHEN THERE'S OK DISCUSSION ACROSS THE AISLE LIKE I SEE QUITE A BIT THOUGH SOMETIMES NOT FOR DAYS AT A TIME BUT MAYBE WE COULD TRY A LITTLE MORE TENDERNESS AND SEE IF THAT WORKS BUT THEN AGAIN A LOT OF CHRISTIANS ARE HATERS TOO AND SO THEY INVITE THE CRITICISM THEY RECEIVE AND THEN ACT LIKE WHINGING BABIES WHEN THEY GET A LITTLE BIT OF FLACK FOR FOURTEEN PARAGRAPHS OF HATRED AND BILE AND THE LIKE BUT MAYBE WE SHOULD GO ABOUT IT A DIFFERENT WAY I DUNNO
I feel your caps, moby.
No, I think they are giving him a hard time because he acted like a paranoid jerk. There are other ways to ask for help, and yes, even other ways to vent frustration.
I can post my copy of the list if he would like to see it.
Haven't you noticed? This place breeds paranoia and frustration. As well as jerks. The snark outnumbers the thoughtful comments probably 99 to 1. Every other post is a dogpile on someone, usually some Christian, with many of the dogpilers being atheists who are (rather strangely) seldom if ever up in arms against buddhists, muslims, hindus, or jews. I'm not sure what your banner shows (perhaps the same thing as mine?), but on my end I'm seeing "Hear God? You're (usually) Not Crazy" and "Jesus was a Dirty, Dirty God." And on top of that, the profanity filter effectively works in favor of brief snark and bullying, and against well-thought-out, point by point (i.e. lengthy) discussion. In other words, practically everything about this blog is weighted heavily against religion, specifically against christianity. And on top of that, one of my favorite sights here is seeing/reading people who attack the bible for being nothing but myth and fairy tale, but who probably are into vampires, werewolves, zombies, and world of warcraft. and the flying spaghetti monster, ha ha. we all have our religions. and our hypocrisies...
regarding your copy of the verboten verbiage list, I'm sure LUKE would appreciate it...
That's because CNN is nothing more than Satan's heathenous disciples.
luke: it's an automatic word filter. i see that your persecution complex is working fine, though
carolyn: satan's heathenous disciples? got your kneepads on for the salvation? take breath mints......forever is a long time for that taste to be in your mouth
Sam, you're a fu.ck.ing degenerate...
People who insist that being gay is a choice only do so to make them more secure in their masculinity as they confront their gay experimentation. Doing gay and being gay are not the same thing.
But it's ok that Obama had as a pal a minister who advocated the destruction of the white race? Noted.
You are totally CLUELESS. Supply any FACTS.
Yes, I'm sure you think you're special.
Richard, you are so clueless, it's a wonder that you know how to use a key board and post a comment.
If being gay is an abomination in God's eyes, then why does God create gays? People don't get to choose to which gender they want to be attracted, because no one can simply wake up and choose to be attracted to a different gender other than the gender to which they are already attracted. Therefore, God creates gays.
There are two conclusions to this conundrum: (1) God is a hypocrite, because He creates gays and then labels them as abominations, or (2) God simply does not exist. I choose to believe the latter, because a god of love wouldn't be so cruel and intolerant.
You dont believe in anything so did you really write this are you even really there.
just a joke i apologize if its taken the wrong way
I believe in many things; however, I choose not to believe in anything based upon faith. Faith is gullibility; therefore, I rely upon evidence, as do all rational human beings.
I wouldn't allow a doctor to perform open-heart surgery on me simply because he said that I needed it. I would demand proof first. The doctor could perform a CAT scan, and then I could observe it with my own eyes and make conclusions based upon the results.
It just amazes me how humans can use reason and logic in every aspect of their lives, but when it comes to their religious beliefs, they rely merely on faith. It just disturbs me, that's all.
No offense taken, BTW.
"It just disturbs me"....Well you're the one braggin' about pride.
People are not created qu eer it is a learned and practiced sin of someone with extremely low moral character. Qu eers the people who have killed millions of innocents by bringing the world AIDS.
No gays have ever done what God did when he torturously killed EVERY pregnant woman, child, baby, and fetus on the face of the earth.
Why not read the Bible some day?
Thank you for your respectful response.
There is scientific evidence to prove your point egregiously wrong. People do not learn to become gay, and people cannot choose to become gay later on in life. You're quite deluded.
People also do not create diseases and viruses. Viruses were in existence even before humans, so your argument is baseless.
It is true that gays spread HIV moreso than straight people. However, this is not the case in Africa, the country with the highest rate of HIV victims, so, once again, your argument is baseless.
Take off your faith goggles; they're blinding you.
I suspect "lol" and "pervert alert" are the same troll.
I'm sorry, "pervert alert", but all of your assertions to date have been unfounded. Using my Idiomatic Expression Equivalency module (IEE), the expression that best matches the degree to which your repeated assertions may represent truths is: "CHRONIC EPIC FAIL".
To answer your question God didn't create gays imperfection did. Was the first humans gay no they wasn't was their imperfect offspring gay yes. You seem to forget that God created only 3 human beings Adam,Eve and Jesus the others are offsprings of imperfect parents through one man sin entered the earth and through sin death.
How could there be evil and intolerance if there was no God? Where would it come from and why would it matter?
Phazon, gays and lesbians are exactly who they were born to be. Just because they make you uncomfortable doesn't mean there is anything wrong with them. The flaw lies within you.
"Was the first humans gay no they wasn't "
was you the head of your class, no you wasn't
Another possibility is that god is fallible and accidentally creates gays. It is possible that (this hypothetical god) is not omnipotent.
Gays are the GUO's. Given Up Ones because they're not into Truth. Now they want "jesus" on their terms.
The pastor did not want to face the gay gestapo.
Maybe he just realized what a hypocrite he is.
LOL If there really was a gay gestapo, don't you think they would have equal rights by now?
We all can see now why louie was right in backing out. There are those who would rather pick others apart instead of focusing on the important part and that is backing our leaders and giving them the support they need.
And Giglio is one of those pick aparters.
He only relays what the bible says. And if you watched and read his work he has made reference to his own sin to and in that not making himself exempt from the same scrutiny
If he "only relates what the Bible says," I wonder when he's going to argue in favor of polygamy? or slavery? or avoiding shellfish? etc.
will there be prayers offered by any pastafarians?
Yup, chicago style italian mobster hot dogs have brought you the Big O and want a few words. And the kickbacks of waivers for all the unions.
I will be praying for all of you who do not believe in the Word of God!!
It's your time to waste, but if you get a kick out of imaginary magic words, go for it.
What makes you believe that the Bible is the word of God? You think that the Bible is God's word because the Bible says that it's God's word? That's just ignorant.
The Bible was written by sand dwellers living in the Middle East about 2,000+ years ago, and the gospels weren't even written until about 70 years after Christ's death. Therefore, the gospels were NOT written by eye-witnesses. Rather, the gospels were written by secondary sources over 7 decades after the events alleged happened.
Many stories of the Bible were stolen from the Pagans. For example, Hercules was a man-god who had a god for a father and a mortal for a mother. Jesus was a man-god who had a god for a father and a mortal for a mother. Do you see how silly this is now?
If I told you that I believed in Zeus and Hercules, then I'm sure that you would label me as insane. When you realize why you would label someone as insane for believing in Zeus and Hercules, then perhaps you will realize why I label you insane for believing in another mythical, invisible, magical deity.
Which god, Tina? Which word? Humans have worshiped thousands of gods through the course of history (and not a single shred of evidence for any of them). Most of them had "holy" words attached. Do you believe in all of them or are you simply pinning all your hopes on one god and hoping that it's the right one?
Hey I just want to urge you to pick up and read the book "The Reason for God" by Timothy Keller. I can assure you it's not some ploy to turn you into a Christian; this is not my intention and it is certainly not the author's. However, it is a great book and a very good intellectual study of "faith" and Timothy Keller rationalizes it the best ways possible.
If you aren't willing to shell out money on a book suggested by a stranger on a topic you seem to oppose, I'd be more than happy to buy it for you and send it to your address. Here's my email: firstname.lastname@example.org if you're interested in that; I'll get hard cover or paperback, whichever you prefer.
Again, I don't want you to read this to change your life or anything like that, it's simply the best counter argument I can think of. Not that I"m trying to argue with you, I just want you to see another perspective on this.
@Peter: Thanks for the offer; that's very generous of you. However, I spent over 20 years of my life reading and studying the bible, and I believed every word of it. Then, I learned about science, evolution, biology, astronomy, etc., and I realized that all of the scientific knowledge that we have today – gained through hard work, research, testing, and observable evidence – suggests that God does not exist.
Furthermore, I've studied other religions and speculated on all of the religions of the world, and I came to realize that, without evidence, there is no way to discern religious truth from religious fiction. Therefore, I was taking quite a gamble putting my faith in simply one religion, bible, and god.
You're an atheist, too, because you dismiss the plethora of other gods which are believed in and worshipped today. When you realize why you find it ridiculous why Hindus believe in a monkey and elephant god, then perhaps you will realize why I find it ridiculous that Christians believe in another invisible, mythical deity.
Good day to you, Peter.
I will too, Tina...
Spend a lot of time on your knees, do you Tina?
I believe in the Word of God, and that Word is LOVE. Read the Gospels, dear. Jesus preached LOVE.
Heaven (or Hell) forbid a minister calling perversion a sin. Perhaps if we had more preachers doing the same America would not be going down the tubes.
It would be better if ministers told their congregations about all of THEIR sins so they wouldn't be such HYPOCRITES picking on gays.
Oh, you mean like the perversion called interracial marriage back in the 60's? Or that perversion of women wanting to vie in the 1910's? Sounds like you're then one in need of 'saving', along with a dose of living 21st century brain cells.
Well stated. Most of the commentary here follows standard liberal rules...if you disagree then you are ridiculed, verbally assaulted and any attempt at minimization of your commentary is acceptable. Any farcical retort encouraged by a lost generation here indeed. The saddest part is most of these people responding truly have no clue in their lives and are utterly lost. Even the pastor who backed out tried the politically correct route before backing out, after all teaching Jesus message can be watered down when people disagree, right? Most of the push back can be traced to people who do not wish to have their shortcomings addressed and certainly have no desire to be held accountable for their words and actions. Nothing is morally wrong any more in the new way of thinking and the Christian faith should be ridiculed at all costs. Wonder why it is just Christianity that most of you cannot tolerate, yet you are open armed towards muslims and other faiths. Could it be that this hits too close to home? Hold yourself accountable for the gifts you have been graciously given and stop promoting immorality. That is indeed why this country is falling apart, from within.
"people who do not wish to have their shortcomings addressed and certainly have no desire to be held accountable for their words and actions."
What a perfect example of the Christian hypocrites who ignore all their sins to pick on gays. Well done.
Perversion? Oh, please. Get over it, already. Do you REALLY think that gays are going to suddenly disappear because someone says they're "perverted"? H0mos3xuality has existed since man walked upright, you idiot.
I couldn't agree more. Well done :)
Christians should be ridiculed when they advocate prejudice. Reality shows that ho.mos.exuality is a natural orientation. There is nothing innately wrong with same gender relationships, no matter what your 2000 year old book of mythology says.
On the other hand, there is no proof of god (any god) or heaven or hell, no proof that the bible was anything other than a human construct and no proof that christianity leads to any special virtue.
In the end, your religion is nothing more than what you have chosen to believe, and it has no authority over anyone who does not choose to follow it. Christians like to think they are above criticism, but in truth, they are not.
mike: or, it would make more ministers appear to be totally out of touch
Why is there going to be a prayer at all at the Inauguration? Despite the President being a Christian, he is serving a secular duty for all Americans of all faiths and none. Ditch the prayers completely.
Exactly, the Masters don't have a prayer.
Servants gone wild and the public morphed into cheerleaders. Must be a bush thang.
Exactly. The presidential inauguration is no place for religion. It is about a civil leader not about religion. The mere fact that he was invited, regardless of his obvious bigotry, should be the story, not the fact that he hates gays.
I have serious doubts that Obama is a Christian. I suspect that he is a Secular Humanist. His professed faith in the Christian god is probably politically-motivated.
Why is the inauguration required?? There are a lot of $ available, is it? Same guy, four more years. Just keep working!
The CNN Belief Blog covers the faith angles of the day's biggest stories, from breaking news to politics to entertainment, fostering a global conversation about the role of religion and belief in readers' lives. It's edited by CNN's Daniel Burke with contributions from Eric Marrapodi and CNN's worldwide news gathering team.