Deaf victim of sex abuse is suing pope, and going public with his story for the first time
September 23rd, 2010
09:10 AM ET

Deaf victim of sex abuse is suing pope, and going public with his story for the first time

Editor’s note: A one-hour CNN special, “What the Pope Knew,” will air Sept. 25 and Sept. 26, 8pm and 11pm ET. This story is drawn from that exclusive report.

By Scott Bronstein
CNN Special Investigations Unit

MILWAUKEE, Wisconsin – Terry Kohut has kept a dark secret for nearly 50 years. Now he is breaking his silence, becoming a key figure in the sex-abuse crisis in the Catholic Church and the growing controversy over what Pope Benedict XVI did about it.

When Kohut was barely a teen, and for years afterward, he says, he was sexually molested and assaulted by the headmaster and priest of the school where he lived, St. John’s School for the Deaf, in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. What occurred there is one of the most notorious cases of sex abuse in the Catholic Church.

Kohut was not alone. From 1950 to 1974 the headmaster of St. Johns, Father Lawrence C. Murphy, raped and molested as many as 200 deaf boys, according to court and church documents.

Kohut has now filed the first sex-abuse lawsuit against the Vatican actually naming Pope Benedict, previously known as Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger, as a defendant.

Ratzinger was once head of the Vatican’s powerful CDF, the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, charged in certain circumstances with investigating the sexual abuse of minors by priests. And though church records show the abuse by Father Murphy was brought to the attention of Ratzinger and the CDF years ago, a church trial against the headmaster was stopped and he was allowed to remain a priest.

The Vatican’s “policy of secrecy” in abuse cases, and its “directives to conceal the sexual abuse of children” by priests, the lawsuit says, helped bring about the abuse of Kohut and others by Father Murphy.

Kohut has never before gone public or spoken about what Father Murphy did to him. He has remained anonymous in the suit, listed only as “John Doe 16,” one of dozens of men alleging abuse.

In an exclusive interview with CNN, Kohut, 60, spoke with his hands and through an interpreter, describing how the abuse by Father Murphy started.

“I went into his office, the door was closed,” he said. “And Father Murphy said, ‘Take your pants down. And so I did… you know, he was always in his black attire with a white collar, and you know … I was questioning why he would ask me to do that. Here he is, a priest, and – I have to obey him. And he proceeded to touch me.”

What happened to Kohut and the other deaf boys -– and the handling of the Murphy case by Ratzinger’s office - are central issues in a widening examination of the church’s role in covering up sexual abuse by priests. Did that approach reach as high as the man who would become the pope?

“I think what the Murphy case shows is the deference that Cardinal Ratzinger and Pope Benedict would give to the priests,” said David Gibson, a pope biographer and author of “The Rule of Benedict.” Ratzinger, like other Vatican officials “would always accede to the priest’s wishes first, rather than the victim’s wishes, rather than justice for the victims. They were secondary to what the priest wanted and what he felt was best for keeping things quiet and taking care of the institutional church.”

Steven Geier and Carl Nelson were also deaf students who say Father Murphy sexually assaulted them repeatedly. They say Father Murphy would prowl the dorm at night, visiting boys in their beds, raping and sexually assaulting them. He would also routinely assault and molest his victims in one of the church’s most sacred places – the confessional – church documents show.

Father Murphy is believed to have picked out victims who were especially vulnerable, or had been through tragedy already in their young lives. Terry Kohut fit that pattern. His older brother was electrocuted and died when he was just 10 years old. The next year, their father hanged himself. And the following year Kohut’s only close companion, his dog, died. “It all really tore me up…. I saw Father Murphy and I thought that he could be a second father. But to my shock he took advantage of that.”

Minnesota attorney Jeff Anderson is the lead lawyer in Kohut’s lawsuit. Anderson has filed hundreds of lawsuits for sexual abuse victims of priests, and has obtained a massive trove of internal Vatican documents to build his case against the pope. He says numerous abuse cases show that Vatican officials all the way to the top, including then Cardinal Ratzinger, did little to help the victims, and were mostly interested in protecting the church from scandal.

Father Murphy was “one of the worst pedophiles” in U.S. history, says Peter Isely, a leader in SNAP, the Survivors Network of those Abused by Priests. Isely, of Milwaukee, says he himself was raped repeatedly by a priest as a child. He has led groups of victims to Rome to criticize the church and demand accountability – especially in the case of Father Murphy.

“This is the story of a man raping and assaulting 200 deaf children,” he says. “To think that there are all these children being raped -– these disabled deaf children - who can’t even scream out, can’t speak out. It’s monstrous.”

“It wasn’t easy living in the dorm,” said Geier, 60, through a deaf interpreter. “There were no parents there. No police. We were stuck. It was like a prison. You can’t get out.”

Groups of boys tried to tell local police and even the local District Attorney in Milwaukee about what was being done to them, according to Kohut, Geier, Nelson and others CNN interviewed. But no one ever believed their story, and local police even drove them back to the school, returning the boys to Father Murphy.

After years of allegations and reports of abuse, and threats of lawsuits, local bishops finally moved Father Murphy in 1974 to remote northern Wisconsin. There, more abuse allegations later surfaced.

On July 17, 1996 the Archbishop of Milwaukee, Rev. Rembert Weakland, wrote to then-Cardinal Ratzinger at the CDF, describing Father Murphy’s abuse and his “use of the confessional to solicit sinful actions.” Rev. Weakland asked Cardinal Ratzinger how to proceed.

After eight months and two more letters to the Vatican, Rev. Weakland heard from Cardinal Ratzinger’s secretary, telling him to proceed with a secret church trial, which could result in Father Murphy being defrocked, or removed from the priesthood. The trial preparations were under way, and the case was moving ahead. One church document describing the local investigation results said the Murphy situation “may very well be the most horrendous, number-wise, and especially because these are physically challenged, vulnerable people.”

But as the secret trial preparations moved ahead, on Jan. 12, 1998, Father Murphy wrote a personal letter to Cardinal Ratzinger.

“The accusations against me were for actions alleged to have taken place over twenty-five years ago,” Murphy wrote. “I am seventy-two years of age, your Eminence, and am in poor health. I have repented of any of my past transgressions.” The priest basically asked to be left alone, writing “I simply want to live out the time that I have left in the dignity of my priesthood. I ask your kind assistance in this matter.”

After Father Murphy’s personal letter to Cardinal Ratzinger, and despite the entreaties of the local archbishops and the detailed case file against Father Murphy, something seemed to change. Cardinal Ratzinger’s secretary wrote again to Archbishop Weakland, but this time the letter and approach from Rome struck a different chord, seemingly sympathetic to the Father Murphy.

Cardinal Ratzinger’s secretary described Father Murphy’s personal letter, and then asked Archbishop Weakland “to give careful consideration” to “pastoral measures” instead of a trial, such as counseling and supervision “destined to obtain the reparation of scandal and the restoration of justice.”

The local archbishops disagreed, and one wrote back to Rome that “scandal cannot be sufficiently repaired, nor justice sufficiently restored, without a judicial trial against Father Murphy.” And in May 1998, Archbishop Weakland and several other Milwaukee officials flew to Rome to meet with Cardinal Ratzinger’s team about the case. Notes from the Wisconsin Archdiocese log of that meeting state: “It became clear” that Cardinal Ratzinger’s office “was not encouraging us to proceed with any formal dismissal…”

Finally on August 19, 1998, Archbishop Weakland wrote that he would follow the CDF’s suggestion and stop the trial of Father Murphy, and instead “put together a pastoral plan” for him.

That meant Father Murphy remained a priest for the rest of his life. He died in 1998 and was buried in Milwaukee with the full dignity and honors of a Holy Roman Catholic priest in good standing, angering many who knew what he had done.

The Vatican has called the Murphy case “tragic,” issuing a statement earlier this year saying it “involved particularly vulnerable victims who suffered terribly from what he did. By sexually abusing children who were hearing-impaired, Father Murphy violated the law and, more importantly, the sacred trust that his victims had placed in him.”

The Vatican pointed out that more than two decades passed before Murphy’s abuse came to the attention of local church officials, police, and the Vatican.

Its actions, the Vatican stated, were taken “in light of the facts that Father Murphy was elderly and in very poor health, and that he was living in seclusion and no allegations of abuse had been reported in over 20 years.”

In a rare interview, Monsignor Charles Scicluna, the Vatican’s prosecutor, told CNN he understands the frustration and anger in the Murphy case.

“If the case would have been decided today with the knowledge we have, the judgment may have been different… We’re talking about human judgment here.” Asked whether the judgment by Cardinal Ratzinger was faulty in the Murphy case, Monsignor Scicluna replied, “I wouldn’t say faulty because it is a judgment that took care of reparation, of scandal in the sense that it expected a public admission of guilt and it also ensured that Father Murphy be kept in a ministry which did not constitute a risk.”

Asked if the Murphy decision were a mistake, Monsignor Scicluna said, “No, I wouldn’t call it a mistake. I would call it a different take on a very difficult case.”

But Terry Kohut and other victims say justice for them could not even begin without Father Murphy losing his title and good standing as a priest.

Kohut, whose lawsuit alleges that through a policy of secrecy “the Holy See knowingly allowed, permitted and encouraged child sex abuse by its priests, including Murphy,” has a question for the pope today:

“I would ask him why? Why did you stop that trial? Why did you give pity to Father Murphy? I mean what about me, what about the 200 other boys?”

Steven Geier agrees and has his own message to the Pope:

“I believe this pope knew everything. He knew it was happening. I feel like all he did was ignore every deaf child who was abused by Father Murphy. In their eyes the church comes first, not the kids. They asked us to forgive them, forgive Father Murphy and there is no way that we could ever forgive him. Tell the pope to stop all this bull-.”

Kohut has written numerous letters to church officials about the abuse. Some of them were sent to top Vatican officials, including Cardinal Ratzinger.

In a letter to Father Murphy in 1995, Kohut wrote:

“I would lay awake every night, shaking in fear that this would be a night you would touch me. Can you imagine that? Can you? Jesus on the Cross on the wall saw you coming every night to molest us. He must have been shocked and grieved every time. I hope he cried like we did, because we were innocent children.”

Kohut says Father Murphy never responded.

- CNN Belief Blog

Filed under: Bishops • Catholic Church • Christianity • Pope Benedict XVI

soundoff (1,247 Responses)
  1. May

    Unfortunate things have happened. We cannot judge everything in the past, by todays laws and standards. It was wrong then, there is no doubt, however, even the police acted differently, they returned the boys instead of taking them into protective custody.
    Remember that Hugh Heffner was already having quite the influence, people were starting to be 'accepting' of perversion, to 'stay' with the times. The 60's were 'free love'. The climate, although wrong, very very very wrong, was different than it is today.
    Comment was made in the article 'the secretary wrote'. How many times does a secretary write on their own? In the name of their boss? Many times, perhaps too many.

    September 23, 2010 at 12:23 pm |
    • Frogist

      @May: Does that mean you are excusing the church's actions?

      September 23, 2010 at 4:53 pm |
  2. Disgusted

    Funny that the people in charge in the catholic faith must not believe in what they preach... how else could they possibly molest children or knowingly enable others to do so? It is incredible to me and very sad that so many people continue following this organization and even donating money. The world is full of sheople.

    September 23, 2010 at 12:23 pm |
  3. Threehams

    I think that the UN should put together a task force and invade Vatican City killing every priest, cleric, and decon in that cesspool of pedophilia.

    September 23, 2010 at 12:22 pm |
  4. Town Business

    All you people out there who have been searching the world over for the Anti Christ, I believe we have found him. Its not Hitler, Stalin, Castro, or Obama, Its the Pope and his minions in the Catholic church. You mean to tell me they elected this man pope? Wow, great judge of character, nice pick. The cold part is, he's not the only one who knows. This is not just the Catholic church either, this happens in all forms of Organized religion. I say that to say this, People keep your faith, and keep a closer eye on your church.

    September 23, 2010 at 12:21 pm |
  5. george

    Monsignor Scicluna's responses show that the problem persists. The Catholic Church is still more concerned with protecting their own behinds than in seeking justice for those children who were abused in it's name. They have lost any moral authority that they may have had. For shame!

    September 23, 2010 at 12:20 pm |
  6. Neil Erickson

    PROOF!! There really is no such thing as a "good Catholic"

    September 23, 2010 at 12:20 pm |
  7. rajbhanu

    And people say Ahmadinejad is the Satan. How about ppl like these popes an all who delude people in the name of GOD and RELIGION !!

    September 23, 2010 at 12:19 pm |
  8. Adam Dude

    In Modern Day, the catholic Church is nothing but a money making machine

    Ask anyone who sends there kids to catholic school

    He should sue for 1 Billion dollars and put them out of business

    September 23, 2010 at 12:18 pm |
  9. JoeJoe9

    And hear come all the Atheists and their God bashing ...

    September 23, 2010 at 12:18 pm |
    • Bob

      You bet! Ain't it grand?

      September 23, 2010 at 12:24 pm |
    • JoeJoe9

      Oh sure, I just love people that are full of hate & delusion that they 'know' there is no God & that science can somehow explain it all... Maybe you all should start thinking for yourselves like you tell religious people, and start researching on whether its possible to not have existence of God ... start with Philosophy of Metaphysics "Unmoved mover" vs "moved movers".

      September 23, 2010 at 12:44 pm |
  10. Sick

    The catholics are sick pedophiles. Talk about two face when they are all about not allowing people have to have gay marriages but they go behind close doors and molest childern. Truely disgusting and this has been going on for centuries

    September 23, 2010 at 12:17 pm |
  11. MAcatholic

    I have given up on the Catholic church. But not because of the pedophile priests themselves, as this is not just a church problem given that there are pedophiles everywhere.

    I've given up on the Church because of its failed leadership. It failed to look after its children.

    September 23, 2010 at 12:17 pm |
    • Mike M

      It was mostly Catholics of a certain sort who failed in their leadership. Thank God that generation is on its way out.

      September 23, 2010 at 12:32 pm |
  12. Ken

    "Groups of boys tried to tell local police and even the local District Attorney in Milwaukee about what was being done to them, ...... But no one ever believed their story, and local police even drove them back to the school, ",,, Okay, where is the lawsuit against these people? Would you not think that they are also responsible? Or would you suspect that this law firm who is handling the suit is just after the publicity and money they think that the church has?

    September 23, 2010 at 12:16 pm |
    • CatholicMom

      It is most likely a small police department; also, they probably have little money, plus statute of limitation may be a reason; those officers who took the boys back to the school could be dead by now. A good lawyer looking for real justice would have made an attempt to find ALL responsible not just the ones that would give them notoriety or have money.

      September 25, 2010 at 8:01 pm |
  13. sonya

    There is a God. But it seems to me that the catholic church hold thier priests in higher esteem than they do God or they wouldn't ignore what is going on in thier churches. Reputation is not going to get anyone into heaven.

    September 23, 2010 at 12:16 pm |
  14. sonya

    There is a God. But it seems to me that the catholic church hold thier priests in higher esteem than they do Godm or they wouldn't ignore what is going on in thier churches. Reputation is not going to get anyone into heaven.

    September 23, 2010 at 12:16 pm |
  15. Former Catholic School Boy

    Religion is a business. Always was, always will be. They covered things up so as not to have a drop in income. Even now they are closing unprofitable schools. If they really cared about people they would sell one of those materpeices at the vatican and keep the schools open or feed the poor. Church leaders are mostly hypocrites which is a shame because I know many very good and decent Catholics who truly care about people.

    September 23, 2010 at 12:14 pm |
  16. Doug

    So why did he not face charges in a court of law? It seems like in each of these cases not only did the Catholic church fail, but the local justice system failed as well. The church can't stop a police officer from arresting and charging a priest. Yet that never seems to happen. How could this happen over and over again, yet hardly anyone get arrested?

    September 23, 2010 at 12:13 pm |
  17. Sandy Beach

    It's always a case of my imaginary friend is better than your imaginary friend.

    September 23, 2010 at 12:13 pm |
  18. august

    To bad they cant go ahead with the trial against murphey and take his honors away and bury him in unconsecrated grounds

    September 23, 2010 at 12:11 pm |
  19. Mike M

    Why doesn't he sue the police department who dropped the case against Fr. Murphy? Or Rembert Weakland who waited more than a decade to tell Pope Benedict?

    This case is a sick joke where an attention seeking lawyer is using a poor deaf man who was abused as a child in order to make headlines with a case that doesn't have a chance in hell of success. It's disgusting and lawyers like that should be punished.

    September 23, 2010 at 12:09 pm |
  20. Coralie

    I think it is disgusting that anyone would support this person being the POPE when he knew after the fact and did nothing to punish Father Murphy for the abuse of these children. How anyone can stand behind him is beyond me. I am not, nor have I ever been religious, however I do understand how important the role of the Pope is, and it baffles me that some Catholics, and even non, are supporting and/or defending Pope Benedicts actions.

    September 23, 2010 at 12:07 pm |
    • Mike M

      It's not true that he didn't do anything. He finally forced the Diocese to push forward with a trial to have Murphy kicked out of the priesthood (which is all the Church can do.) Murphy died before the case was finished, but he had been removed from ministry.

      September 23, 2010 at 12:19 pm |
    • Frogist

      @Mike M: The article doesn't state that the Pope did what you said. It actually states that the archibishop and other priests in Milwaukee pushed for the Vatican to do something but they were placated into doing nothing. And that Murphy was not kicked out but was buried with honors. I'd like to know if you have a source for what you are saying. I'd like to read it.

      September 23, 2010 at 4:43 pm |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
About this blog

The CNN Belief Blog covers the faith angles of the day's biggest stories, from breaking news to politics to entertainment, fostering a global conversation about the role of religion and belief in readers' lives. It's edited by CNN's Daniel Burke with contributions from Eric Marrapodi and CNN's worldwide news gathering team.