Newt Gingrich’s faith journey: How a thrice-married Catholic became an evangelical darling
Newt Gingrich has spent time as a Lutheran, a Baptist and a Roman Catholic.
December 10th, 2011
10:00 PM ET

Newt Gingrich’s faith journey: How a thrice-married Catholic became an evangelical darling

By Dan Gilgoff, CNN.com Religion Editor

Editor’s note: This is part of an occasional series of stories looking at the faith of the leading 2012 presidential candidates, including Mitt Romney, Rick Perry and Newt Gingrich. We also profiled the faith journey of Herman Cain before he suspended his campaign.

(CNN) - There’s an e-mail war raging among some of the nation’s leading evangelicals over whether Newt Gingrich has repented enough for his sins to be president.

One recent skirmish was set off by an open letter urging Gingrich to give a major speech confronting his perceived moral stumbles, including an affair with his third wife, Callista, while married to No. 2.

“You need to make it as clear as you possibly can that you deeply regret your past actions and that you do understand the anguish and suffering they caused others, including your former spouses,” Richard Land, public policy chief for the Southern Baptist Convention, wrote.

Land urged Gingrich to make a public promise “that there will be no moral scandals in a Gingrich White House.”

Rather than galvanizing the faithful, however, Land’s letter provoked an outcry from a handful of evangelical leaders who argued Gingrich has repented enough and deserves forgiveness.

On an e-mail thread among conservative Christian heavyweights, Jerry Falwell Jr. invoked the biblical story of a woman of ill repute who met Jesus at a well. Though the woman had been married five times, Jesus forgave her.

“The woman at the well was fortunate she encountered Jesus that day instead of some of our evangelical brethren,” the Liberty University president wrote, in an apparent swipe at Land.

On the same e-mail chain, which CNN obtained from a conservative activist, prominent Atlanta preacher Richard Lee said the nation’s evangelicals needed to support Gingrich.

Lee called Gingrich “the only forceful Christian candidate who can at this point be elected and cleanse the White House next November.”

The evangelical tussling over Gingrich says a lot about the fractured state of the Republican Party less than a month before the Iowa caucuses officially usher in the 2012 race for the White House.

The sight of influential evangelicals rallying around Gingrich, a Catholic with serious “values” baggage, speaks to the huge political vulnerability of Mitt Romney, who was the perceived GOP front-runner until recent polls put Gingrich at the front of the pack.

Gingrich speaking at the April 2011 National Catholic Prayer Breakfast in D.C.

Whether because of Romney’s past liberalism on gay rights and abortion or because of his Mormon faith, many of the evangelical Christians who make up the Republican base just don’t like him.

They’ve been looking for an alternative, by turns telling pollsters of their support for Michele Bachmann, then Rick Perry, then Herman Cain. One by one, they’ve dropped in the polls, or out of the race altogether. Now it’s Gingrich’s turn in the spotlight.

But the argument over Gingrich’s personal life also raises fundamental questions about the candidate himself and his readiness for the nation’s highest office.

Just how much has Gingrich changed since his days as a volatile and philandering House speaker? Does he have the character to be president? And, at least for many of the evangelical voters who will dominate the early primaries: Is he a true believer?

Faith by geography

Gingrich has identified with different branches of Christianity that mirror his surroundings at different stages of life.

Born near Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, an area settled by the largely Lutheran Pennsylvania Dutch, Gingrich was the son of a Lutheran mom and a Pennsylvania Dutch stepfather who adopted him.

Attending college at Atlanta’s Emory University and grad school at Tulane University in New Orleans, Gingrich became a Southern Baptist.

And as a creature of Washington, where Gingrich’s wife sings in a Catholic choir and where many prominent conservative Republicans have converted to Catholicism in the last decade, Gingrich joined the Catholic fold in 2009.

“I think that was all part of his pilgrimage,” says Ike Reighard, who was Gingrich’s pastor in Atlanta for nearly 20 years. “Whatever is the dominant religion in the region he was in, that was his progression... He was always super inquisitive, searching for deeper meaning.”

Gingrich’s stepdad was an army officer, making for a peripatetic family life that included stretches spent at military bases in Europe and at Fort Benning, Georgia, situated in the heart of the Bible Belt.

Gingrich, who declined interview requests for this story, was raised largely by his maternal grandmother, a devout Lutheran who, he has said, “taught me my most basic lessons about God and Satan.”

But Gingrich left his childhood denomination through an immersion baptism at the Saint Charles Avenue Baptist Church in New Orleans while at Tulane, where he was pursuing a Ph.D. in European history.

In a pattern that would last a lifetime, studying religion’s role in history and politics moved Gingrich to deepen his own faith.

Saint Charles Avenue’s pastor, G. Avery Lee, said Gingrich wasn’t a member of any church when the two first met.

“He said that in his study of political theory, he noted how much influence the church had had … and asked if I could explain,” Lee wrote in a 1994 letter to the New Orleans Times-Picayune, describing his first encounter with Gingrich.

Lee and Gingrich grew close, with the pastor eventually baptizing Gingrich even though his church took “a liberal approach to both theology and sociology.”

“It has been suggested by some that in baptizing him, I didn't hold him under long enough,” Wrote Lee, who died in 2009, in apparent reference to Gingrich’s conservative politics.

But Gingrich was more liberal back then, including on questions of separation of church and state.

“As a college student at Emory when the Supreme Court ruled that prayer was unconstitutional … I didn't notice it,” he said in a 2009 interview. “As a graduate student at Tulane I probably would have said it's a good decision.”

‘I don’t think his faith was the driving force’

After Tulane, Gingrich took a job as a history professor outside Atlanta and almost immediately began running for Congress, losing two races in the mid-’70s.

Around that time he joined New Hope Baptist Church, a 100-year old congregation south of Atlanta where Ike Reighard had recently arrived as the senior pastor.

“He had just lost for the second time and he came in and said, ‘I need your help,’” says Reighard. “I said, ‘What did you want to do in politics?’ He said he wanted to be speaker of the House.”

Gingrich won his next race for Congress in 1978. That year also marked the birth of the modern Christian Right.

The movement started in opposition to an Internal Revenue Service campaign under then-President Jimmy Carter to crack down on private schools resisting court-ordered desegregation.

Word of the campaign provoked fear and outrage among evangelical schools. Jerry Falwell joined the successful effort to thwart the IRS initiative and founded the Moral Majority the following year, in 1979. The group’s focus on fighting abortion and gay rights set the Christian Right agenda for decades to come.

Gingrich, for his part, was not considered part of the new wave of proud Christian Right warriors in Congress, some of whom were swept into power in 1980 on President Ronald Reagan’s coattails and enthusiastically blended their religious faith and politics.

For Gingrich, “I don’t think faith was the driving force,” says Reighard. “He realized that you have to look at issues and they can’t always be driven by your personal views and your religious values.”

“I heard a lot of times that people say evangelicals are one-issue people, all about abortion,” Reighard says. “But that’s not true with Gingrich. Education was important for him. Health care was important. The economy was important.”

Indeed, when Gingrich launched the Conservative Opportunity Society, an influential House caucus, in 1983, he focused on fiscal issues and practical electoral politics.

And yet Gingrich was an early ally of the budding Christian Right, even if he wasn’t a card-carrying member.

Ralph Reed, who would go on to lead the Christian Coalition, remembers watching as a libertarian activist advocating for gay rights and abortion rights challenged Gingrich at an early 1980s College Republicans breakfast.

“Newt pushed back hard,” Reed remembers. “It was clearly a position of intellectual conviction. I wasn’t yet a committed Christian and I remember finding that pretty remarkable, that Newt didn’t try to pacify this guy. He said, ‘No, you’re wrong.’”

Gingrich speaking at a 1987 news conference.

The future House speaker also stayed active at New Hope Baptist Church, which was quickly growing from sleepy country congregation to suburban Atlanta megachurch, even as he spent most of his time in Washington. When Reighard’s wife died during childbirth, Gingrich was on the phone with him while the pastor was still at the hospital.

“He was always there on Sunday mornings,” says Reighard, recalling Gingrich’s House years. “And the other thing he was always great at doing was town-hall-type meetings and potluck dinners. He was a grassroots person. There’s no telling how many of those meals I prayed at.”

Christian coalitions

But a lot of those town halls were more political than religious. Televangelist Pat Robertson launched the Christian Coalition in the early 1990s, and the group organized events around Georgia aimed at getting conservative evangelicals more involved in elections.

Gingrich, who counted himself an evangelical, expressed keen interest in the coalition’s work. But he seemed to be operating less as a pious Christian, and more as a strategist looking for ways the GOP could win the House of Representatives.

“We didn’t get into theological conversations that much,” says Patrick Gartland, executive director of the Georgia Christian Coalition in the early 1990s. “I was a grassroots numbers person. I loved the intricacies of grassroots, and he did, too, and he understood it.”

Unlike the Moral Majority in the 1980s, which was made up of pastors like Falwell, the Christian Coalition sought to mainstream the Christian Right by bringing in laypeople. The group’s local chapters were led by Christian business leaders, teachers and retirees, as opposed to pastors.

And Christian Coalition envisioned a big-tent religious conservatism that was as much about lowering taxes as it was about banning abortion.

For the broad-minded Gingrich, that vision was a perfect fit – especially after the Christian Coalition helped usher in the 1994 Republican Revolution, which put the House in GOP hands for the first time in 40 years.

The takeover catapulted Gingrich to speaker of the House, making him the country’s most powerful Republican. He vowed to pay attention to conservative Christians from his first day on the job, seeking to assuage evangelical activists who felt ignored by the Reagan administration after they’d worked hard for Reagan’s political campaigns.

“There was this dissatisfaction among evangelical leaders about [Reagan], and Newt said to me, ‘I’m not going to let that happen.’”

Best remembered for working with President Bill Clinton on fiscally focused deals like welfare reform and balancing the budget - and fiscal fights that led to a government shutdown - Gingrich also checked off major items on religious conservatives’ wish lists.

He brought a proposed constitutional amendment to allow school prayer up for a House vote. He presided over the adoption of the Partial Birth Abortion Ban Act – the first abortion restriction since Roe v. Wade – and the Defense of Marriage Act, which forbids the federal government from recognizing gay marriage.

Speaker-elect Gingrich with then-wife Marianne and his mother Kathleen at a January 1995 Washington church service.

Yet some evangelical leaders who knew Gingrich fretted over his personal life. The hard-charging speaker displayed braggadocio and rough edges even to political allies and didn’t talk much about his own faith.

“There were a lot of conservative Christian leaders who really loved Newt but felt like he hadn’t really turned his life over to God,” says Reed.

Many of those leaders went nuclear over rumors about Gingrich’s 1998 affair with a young House aide named Callista Bisek, while he was married to his second wife, Marianne.

Theose rumors “would break my heart,” says Reighard, who counseled Gingrich and Marianne in the 1990s. “I always believed that Newt could be one of the great leaders in our country, an American version of Winston Churchill.”

Reborn a Catholic

More than a decade later, Gingrich is back in many evangelicals’ good graces, with polls showing him way out in front of Romney among evangelicals in Iowa, who accounted for 60% of caucus-goers four years ago.

What explains the turnaround?

One big factor is Gingrich’s self-described faith awakening since leaving Congress in 1998. A personal turning point was 2002, when a court ruling struck down the recitation of the Pledge of Allegiance in public schools because of its “Under God” clause.

“That was the last straw,” Gingrich said in a 2009 interview with U.S. News & World Report. “And I said it’s time to challenge head-on secular domination in the West.”

Just as studying political history had led a 20-something Gingrich to the Saint Charles Avenue Baptist Church in New Orleans, political developments like the Pledge ruling and other perceived attacks on religion sparked a round of soul-searching.

Though it was later struck down by the Supreme Court, the ruling led Gingrich to publish “Rediscovering God in America,” a faith-based walking tour of Washington’s key buildings and monuments.

For those close to him, the 2006 book reflected what Gingrich had been preaching for more than a decade: that religion played a key role in the nation’s founding.

“In the ’90s, he talked about this idea that power comes from God to the individual and is loaned to the state,” says Rick Tyler, Gingrich’s former spokesman. “Before that, the European model was that power came from God to the king, and [Gingrich] used to explain why that was corrupt and how Thomas Jefferson turned it on his head.”

By increasing his public attack on the secular “media-academic-legal elite” and promoting his God-infused take on American history, Gingrich was branded a culture warrior during the last decade, gaining appeal among conservative evangelicals.

Gingrich continued the courtship by regularly appearing before audiences of hundreds of evangelical pastors to talk about God, history and politics.

Gingrich delivers the Liberty University commencement address in 2007 following Jerry Falwell

“There’s no question there’s been an evolution in his thinking and speaking and writing on America’s religious heritage, which has become a much bigger part of his lexicon,” says Reed, who leads the Faith and Freedom Coalition and is not endorsing any presidential candidates.

“He’s clearly found his voice on social issues, and less than 30 days from the Iowa caucuses the timing couldn’t be better.”

Gingrich further strengthened ties to grassroots evangelicals in 2009, launching a group aimed at bringing together religious and economic conservatives.

The organization, Renewing American Leadership, poured $150,000 into a successful Iowa campaign to unseat judges who had legalized gay marriage in the state. Many of the Iowa activists who led that 2010 campaign are now bullish on Gingrich.

Admitting to an affair also helped.

At a closed-door meeting with the nation’s top Christian Right leaders ahead of the 2008 election, Gingrich was asked about reports he’d been having an affair while leading the impeachment drive against Clinton after the Monica Lewinsky scandal.

The former speaker owned up to the affair and said it marked one the most shameful periods of his life, a time in which he was “alienated from God,” according to a participant at the meeting who spoke on condition of anonymity.

Though he didn’t run for president in 2008, Gingrich went on James Dobson’s Focus on the Family radio show to admit the affair to the evangelical icon and a national audience: “There's certainly times when I've fallen short of God's standards.”

Gingrich told listeners he’d since turned "to God to receive forgiveness and to receive mercy."

For many evangelicals, the admission and penitent tone struck a chord.

“It all depends on whether Newt has been rewired, in the theological sense of being born again,” says David Lane, an influential evangelical activist who is in regular contact with Gingrich.

“I was one of the wildest men who ever lived, loved women, wine and song, and I came to Christ,” Lane says. “I’m not perfect, but I read the Bible seven days a week. Is Newt a new man? I think he is. There’s something different about him.”

One difference is that, for the last two years, Gingrich has been an active Roman Catholic. He has described his conversion as a decade-long process inspired by Callista, who sings with a choir at the country’s largest Catholic church, Washington’s Basilica of the National Shrine of the Immaculate Conception.

Gingrich has said that years of attending Mass there rubbed off on him, with Pope Benedict XVI’s 2008 visit providing the final impetus to conversion.

Gingrich was especially drawn to the church’s millennia-long history and intellectualism. Discussing one of his visits to St. Peter’s Basilica in Rome, Gingrich has said, “You stand there and you think, this is where St. Peter was crucified. This is where Paul preached.

“You think to yourself, 2,000 years ago the Apostles set out to create a worldwide movement by witnessing to the historic truth they had experienced,” Gingrich said in 2009. “And there it is.”

As opposed to being a letdown to evangelical leaders, Gingrich’s conversion away from evangelical Christianity was received as something like a born-again experience.

“Prior to that, he was a sloppy Baptist who didn’t have a clue about what he believed,” says an evangelical activist who is close to Gingrich. “When he converted, he went through Catechism and had to get his faith straight. It took some of the sloppiness out.”

But Gingrich still has to convince some religious leaders he has straightened out morally.

In his letter to Gingrich urging a speech about his marital history, the Southern Baptist Convention’s Land told Gingrich to emphasize his own religious narrative.

“I know something of your faith journey over the past 20 years,” Land wrote. “Do not hesitate to weave that into your speech to the degree that you are comfortable doing so. It will always resonate with evangelical Christians.”

If polls are to be believed, the story of Gingrich’s journey is resonating already.

- CNN Belief Blog Co-Editor

Filed under: Baptist • Catholic Church • Lutheran • Newt Gingrich • Politics • Pope Benedict XVI • Vatican

soundoff (1,901 Responses)
  1. Sam

    I don't have a problem with him being an adulterer, or having 3 wives...rather, I don't think that it should influence our views of him as a leader of the nation. The real reason we should count him out is because he is a liar and a hypocrite. Also, I would not be able to live in a nation where the president's name is "Newt." That's too slimy, and thus...too apt.

    December 11, 2011 at 10:15 am |
    • Bob

      He lied to three of his wives concerning fidelity, you don't think he would lie to you or
      anybody else? He's a f'n politician, c'mon.

      December 11, 2011 at 10:21 am |
  2. Sagebrush Shorty

    God is coming soon and she is not happy.

    December 11, 2011 at 10:15 am |
  3. Bob

    Why would you believe any politician, seriously?
    These politicians use Christianity as a ploy to gain gullible Christian votes.
    They're all fit for hell. "Unless your righteousness exceeds the Pharisees and Sadducces you will
    by no means enter the kingdom of heaven." If Gingrich fasted for 40 days and devoted his life to
    helping the poor then I would believe him. Until then he's just another power hungry politician.

    December 11, 2011 at 10:14 am |
  4. NhAB

    The Catholic Church, a den of robbers, murderers, and child molesters, rules this country by infiltrating our government, the leadership of other religions, and puts many other subversive elements into every part of world society.

    Their overwhelming thirst for world domination has not subsided one whit.

    Domination gives them money, power, and unfettered access to child victims.
    They rule with an iron fist over the minds of all Catholics. They use terror to rule.
    They have special intelligence and counter-intelligence arms that infiltrate and manipulate every government – sometimes directly, sometimes using the leverage they have in other governments.

    The resources of the Catholic Church are not only in real estate and "treasure", but also include their spy networks, military spies, political spies, and a vast array of propagandists and other subversive elements incorporated into everyday life.

    Their victims include hundreds of millions of innocent people, including children, throughout the history of the Catholic Church.

    Everywhere a Catholic holds a position of real political power is a place where you can find a Catholic who has been granted "special" status within the Catholic Church as a mark of trust.
    They are the tools of the Catholic Church itself, a vast criminal organization that has ruled countries on both sides of the Atlantic for hundreds of years.

    They are well steeped in the arts of concealment, propaganda, subversion, sedition, and manipulation. The Jesuit arm of the CC has even been inventive in these areas and is known for creating spy networks and working behind the scenes in a truly Machiavellian or.gy of manipulation and subversion throughout the world for the past several centuries.

    Newt Gingrich has taken their money and promises.
    I can guarantee you that he is now "specially favored" by the Catholic Church and welcomed into the semi-secret "Opus Dei" subversion branch of the Catholic Church but kept at a distance because he was not raised a Catholic.
    He will be their tool but they will not fully trust him, just like any intelligence organization would treat a new "convert"/spy.

    They already did the same thing with the British ex-Prime Minister who recently "converted" to Catholicism.

    Anywhere you see a politician "convert" to Catholicism you are seeing the hand of the Catholic Church and it's deadly thirst for power, wealth, and a free pass to abuse any of their victims.
    They seek world domination.
    This aim has never decreased throughout their history.
    They have merely kept working behind the scenes and avoided public scrutiny and accountability whenever possible because they know that to do otherwise is to become a visible target to their victims who they also view as enemies.

    Gingrich is a spy. He was always available to the highest bidder.
    Now he is running for President.
    He is nothing but a self-serving traitor, just like so many before him in history.

    Too bad there are so many Catholics in the FBI, otherwise we might see some changes to this long-standing spy network operating in this country.
    As it is, only a massive change will stop the evil being done by the Catholic Church.
    That massive change will have to be violent.
    We are already at war with the Catholic Church. They declared it on US when we ratified our Constltution – they do not want religious freedom for anyone but themselves.

    And they've been hard at work ever since.

    December 11, 2011 at 10:13 am |
    • Bob

      You are absolutely correct.

      December 11, 2011 at 10:15 am |
    • Sam

      Seek immediate help. Psychiatric help. Although going to confession might be good for you 😉

      December 11, 2011 at 10:16 am |
    • Kate

      And guess what elso goes along with the CC? Illuminati

      December 11, 2011 at 10:23 am |
    • Tony

      It looks like you have a lot to say. I'm a Catholic and I would be happy to discuss this with you at http://www.CARM.org. It is an Evangelical forum so most of the people on that site will be in your favor. Just let me know what your user name is. Mine is Lamb's Servant.
      God Bless

      December 11, 2011 at 12:41 pm |
  5. monolith

    Well written article!

    December 11, 2011 at 10:13 am |
  6. Beverly Tatum

    Repenting means nothing if you have no intentiion of changing. Newt does what he wants regardless. He is NO man of principle, values, or honor. He is just another power-hungry, greedy, corporate-kissing Republican who thinks poor people are worthless and their children should be janitors. In God's eyes they are more precious and valuable than the lying Newt.

    December 11, 2011 at 10:10 am |
    • Bob


      December 11, 2011 at 10:16 am |
    • corneliusone

      If he repented of his women mistakes, may be he can repent of his disdain for poor children.

      December 11, 2011 at 7:15 pm |
  7. bellestarrr

    Thats the problem with most christians..they think you can do whatever and just repent ..your forgiven and then you can go on and do whatever and repent and forgiven...unfortunately..this is not the way the universe works...you can repent and have faith that you are forgiven..but the deed is actually recorded in the universe for eternity and there are consequences to our deeds..some we pay while living..others after...for newt to simply brush off the stuff he's done with CONVENIENT words to pacifiy the right wing hate groups is laughable....newt is the sum of his deeds..and they are known to intelligent people...he wont get off that easily with us....the tailgatin crowd would forgive him anything to beat Obama.

    December 11, 2011 at 10:09 am |
    • JeffinIL

      Incorrect. To repent means that one is truly sorry for their actions. "Repenting" and continuing the same behavior isn't repenting. It carries all the weight of a forced apology.

      December 11, 2011 at 10:11 am |
    • Bob

      "They honor me with their lips, but their heart is far removed from me."

      December 11, 2011 at 10:17 am |
    • kelly lunsford

      Genesis 6:6
      And it repented the LORD that he had made man on the earth, and it grieved him at his heart.

      What does that tell you about humanity in general?

      December 11, 2011 at 10:27 am |
  8. jsf12

    We need to get rid of Obama. He is destroying the country. We should be able to do better than Gingrich. I'm pretty sure Romney is better than Gingrich. But the difference between Romney and Gingrich is small compared to the difference between destruction of the country under Obama and starting recovery.

    December 11, 2011 at 10:08 am |
    • SuZieCoyote

      If a man gets his family in financial trouble by 8 years of wild, unchecked spending, being nasty to the neighbors, handing out money to his rich friends, while letting his own house fall into complete disrepair, it will take that family longer than four years to recover. That man is Bush and his Republican party, who is even now blocking all attempts by Obama go get our national house in order because they want him to fail. I, too, am disappointed at Obama's pace and allegiance to the wealthy, but don't think Newt will be our savior. Just look at the man's face. His ugliness is far more than skin deep.

      December 11, 2011 at 10:15 am |
    • Cauzin

      Too easy to knock down your whine, so we won't.

      December 11, 2011 at 10:17 am |
    • kelly lunsford

      Time to chose folks


      December 11, 2011 at 10:29 am |
  9. Jstic

    It would be typical of the GOP to nominate Gingrich. This two timing adulterer is one of the ones at the head of the pack to get Bill Clinton. And his supporters are the very group who wanted Clinton's head on a platter for his indescretions. Gingrinch, who has had MULTIPLE affairs outside of marriage, is now supported by that very group of those who stand on the "moral high ground" that they so desperately want to believe in. Can you say "hypocrisy"?

    December 11, 2011 at 10:07 am |
    • Reptillian

      Hypocrisy, thy name is religion.

      December 11, 2011 at 10:38 am |
  10. JeffinIL

    The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Consti tution; but no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States.

    The Consti tution. Deal with it.

    December 11, 2011 at 10:07 am |
    • JeffinIL

      Sheesh, you have to put a space in Consti tuion because the CNN filter thinks there is a set of knockers in there.

      December 11, 2011 at 10:08 am |
  11. Kate

    Republicans are jsut like dogs.....always return to their own vomit.....by putting the Newtster back in power

    December 11, 2011 at 10:06 am |
  12. Cauzin

    Religion is probably more important than jobs, health and housing for half the population. In 12 I expect the usual shift of discussion to be about abortion, gays, illegals, who is more moral (even Newt because he has been forgiven) and especially who is more American with a cooling breeze from flagwaving at their rallies, while the focus on how to get unemployment down will be just a word thrown around.

    December 11, 2011 at 10:06 am |
  13. twiddly

    Newt is the perfect republican candidate in that he perfectly represents republican hypocrisy.

    December 11, 2011 at 10:05 am |
  14. Kate

    I think this man was invented! The only person to be kicked out of the majority leadership. Now Republicans want to put him back in. Shows how messed up the Republican Tea Con-servatives really are

    December 11, 2011 at 10:04 am |
  15. jp

    Religion itself is phony, dishonest and relies on brainwashing sheep into believing the unbelievable; no wonder it attracts people like Romney and Gingrich; men of no charcter and no inteelect; willing to say ANYTHING and do ANYTHING to get themselves elected to positions in a government they purport to despise
    Evil and nasty, both of them and the GOP

    December 11, 2011 at 10:04 am |
  16. sybaris

    But Christianity makes so much sense!

    An omnipotent god who created the first man out of dirt and the first woman out of dirtman’s rib later impregnates a man’s wife to reproduce itself. After the baby (Jesus) is born it disappears for over 30 years, reappears and sacrifices itself to itself with the aid of the Romans. Before he is killed though he walks on water, turns water into wine, heals lepers and makes a zombie out of a man named Lazarus. Jesus tells us that his death is redemption for having created imperfect beings and that his crucifixion is better than the previous attempt to rid the world of evil a few thousand years earlier. That effort involved 40 days and nights of rain to drown every single living thing except that which boarded a large wooden boat and dispersed themselves on island continents thousands of miles from where the boat eventually landed. After Jesus’ death he reawakens three days later and tells his followers that if you telepathically promise that you accept him as your master, symbolically eat his flesh and drink his blood he will accept you and cleanse you of an evil force you inherited from the dirtman who was convinced by a talking snake to eat a fruit from a magic tree. How can you not believe that?

    December 11, 2011 at 10:03 am |
  17. If horses had Gods ...

    No one has repented enough .. so therefor no one is "qualified" to be President .. so therefor the question is useless. The only real question is, who has the best plan with the ability to accomplish it.

    December 11, 2011 at 10:02 am |
    • jp

      repent? to whom? If you have behaved execrably (as have every one of the gop nominees, EVERY SINGLE ONE except perhaps Huntsman and he is just a puppet for his billionaire daddy) then you have no right to run, let alone be considered.
      These are foul, evil nasty people who lie and equivocate every time they open thier mouths. A coule are certifiably crazy by any definition (Paul and Bachman) A couple are increduiubley stupid (Cain and Santorum) without the brains of a goose. What a sad circus of clowns

      December 11, 2011 at 10:08 am |
  18. Jon

    So let me get this straight... Newt "repents" and is forgiven... but our current President's religion is in constant doubt? Man. If only you guys were this willing to compromise for the good of the nation!

    December 11, 2011 at 10:02 am |
    • Cauzin

      Must agree.

      December 11, 2011 at 10:12 am |
    • Beverly Tatum

      President Obama is the only REAL Christian of the lot of Republican fools. He does not go around telling everyone how Christian he is – he just lives his beliefs. He works hard for the poor, the jobless, the poor children, for education equality for all, has compassion, true love for this country, has values, beliefs and character that never wobble. He is the good and decent man – the Good Samaritian- the leader who loves and works and worries and cares about ALL Americans. I stand with my President. He is the only choice and what a great one he is to lead our nation out of Republican debt and increasingly hateful talk about others not rich and white like them. We are ALL God's children and these evangellical hypocrites seem to like to forget the parts of the Bible that don't fit their racism.

      December 11, 2011 at 10:15 am |
    • sybaris

      Oooo, Beverly played the "real" christian card.

      Gotta laugh at that.

      When you can prove there's a "real" god then maybe you'll have a "real" religion.

      December 11, 2011 at 10:21 am |
  19. voiceofreason

    Dan Gilgoff:

    Nice to see that you have cornered the market on at what level a person needs to be at in order to consider him totally absolved.

    December 11, 2011 at 10:01 am |
  20. jp

    This fat, bloated, windbag is the last thing this country needs. Phony, hypocritical (was cheating on his second wiofe while castigating Bill Clinton, another serial liar), egotistical, a psuedo intellectual and evil to his his rot riddled core. That the GOP would even consider this guy is a testament to how low this party has sunk

    December 11, 2011 at 10:01 am |
    • Kate

      Couldn't have said it better!

      December 11, 2011 at 10:02 am |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44
About this blog

The CNN Belief Blog covers the faith angles of the day's biggest stories, from breaking news to politics to entertainment, fostering a global conversation about the role of religion and belief in readers' lives. It's edited by CNN's Daniel Burke with contributions from Eric Marrapodi and CNN's worldwide news gathering team.