Newt Gingrich’s faith journey: How a thrice-married Catholic became an evangelical darling
Newt Gingrich has spent time as a Lutheran, a Baptist and a Roman Catholic.
December 10th, 2011
10:00 PM ET

Newt Gingrich’s faith journey: How a thrice-married Catholic became an evangelical darling

By Dan Gilgoff, CNN.com Religion Editor

Editor’s note: This is part of an occasional series of stories looking at the faith of the leading 2012 presidential candidates, including Mitt Romney, Rick Perry and Newt Gingrich. We also profiled the faith journey of Herman Cain before he suspended his campaign.

(CNN) - There’s an e-mail war raging among some of the nation’s leading evangelicals over whether Newt Gingrich has repented enough for his sins to be president.

One recent skirmish was set off by an open letter urging Gingrich to give a major speech confronting his perceived moral stumbles, including an affair with his third wife, Callista, while married to No. 2.

“You need to make it as clear as you possibly can that you deeply regret your past actions and that you do understand the anguish and suffering they caused others, including your former spouses,” Richard Land, public policy chief for the Southern Baptist Convention, wrote.

Land urged Gingrich to make a public promise “that there will be no moral scandals in a Gingrich White House.”

Rather than galvanizing the faithful, however, Land’s letter provoked an outcry from a handful of evangelical leaders who argued Gingrich has repented enough and deserves forgiveness.

On an e-mail thread among conservative Christian heavyweights, Jerry Falwell Jr. invoked the biblical story of a woman of ill repute who met Jesus at a well. Though the woman had been married five times, Jesus forgave her.

“The woman at the well was fortunate she encountered Jesus that day instead of some of our evangelical brethren,” the Liberty University president wrote, in an apparent swipe at Land.

On the same e-mail chain, which CNN obtained from a conservative activist, prominent Atlanta preacher Richard Lee said the nation’s evangelicals needed to support Gingrich.

Lee called Gingrich “the only forceful Christian candidate who can at this point be elected and cleanse the White House next November.”

The evangelical tussling over Gingrich says a lot about the fractured state of the Republican Party less than a month before the Iowa caucuses officially usher in the 2012 race for the White House.

The sight of influential evangelicals rallying around Gingrich, a Catholic with serious “values” baggage, speaks to the huge political vulnerability of Mitt Romney, who was the perceived GOP front-runner until recent polls put Gingrich at the front of the pack.

Gingrich speaking at the April 2011 National Catholic Prayer Breakfast in D.C.

Whether because of Romney’s past liberalism on gay rights and abortion or because of his Mormon faith, many of the evangelical Christians who make up the Republican base just don’t like him.

They’ve been looking for an alternative, by turns telling pollsters of their support for Michele Bachmann, then Rick Perry, then Herman Cain. One by one, they’ve dropped in the polls, or out of the race altogether. Now it’s Gingrich’s turn in the spotlight.

But the argument over Gingrich’s personal life also raises fundamental questions about the candidate himself and his readiness for the nation’s highest office.

Just how much has Gingrich changed since his days as a volatile and philandering House speaker? Does he have the character to be president? And, at least for many of the evangelical voters who will dominate the early primaries: Is he a true believer?

Faith by geography

Gingrich has identified with different branches of Christianity that mirror his surroundings at different stages of life.

Born near Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, an area settled by the largely Lutheran Pennsylvania Dutch, Gingrich was the son of a Lutheran mom and a Pennsylvania Dutch stepfather who adopted him.

Attending college at Atlanta’s Emory University and grad school at Tulane University in New Orleans, Gingrich became a Southern Baptist.

And as a creature of Washington, where Gingrich’s wife sings in a Catholic choir and where many prominent conservative Republicans have converted to Catholicism in the last decade, Gingrich joined the Catholic fold in 2009.

“I think that was all part of his pilgrimage,” says Ike Reighard, who was Gingrich’s pastor in Atlanta for nearly 20 years. “Whatever is the dominant religion in the region he was in, that was his progression... He was always super inquisitive, searching for deeper meaning.”

Gingrich’s stepdad was an army officer, making for a peripatetic family life that included stretches spent at military bases in Europe and at Fort Benning, Georgia, situated in the heart of the Bible Belt.

Gingrich, who declined interview requests for this story, was raised largely by his maternal grandmother, a devout Lutheran who, he has said, “taught me my most basic lessons about God and Satan.”

But Gingrich left his childhood denomination through an immersion baptism at the Saint Charles Avenue Baptist Church in New Orleans while at Tulane, where he was pursuing a Ph.D. in European history.

In a pattern that would last a lifetime, studying religion’s role in history and politics moved Gingrich to deepen his own faith.

Saint Charles Avenue’s pastor, G. Avery Lee, said Gingrich wasn’t a member of any church when the two first met.

“He said that in his study of political theory, he noted how much influence the church had had … and asked if I could explain,” Lee wrote in a 1994 letter to the New Orleans Times-Picayune, describing his first encounter with Gingrich.

Lee and Gingrich grew close, with the pastor eventually baptizing Gingrich even though his church took “a liberal approach to both theology and sociology.”

“It has been suggested by some that in baptizing him, I didn't hold him under long enough,” Wrote Lee, who died in 2009, in apparent reference to Gingrich’s conservative politics.

But Gingrich was more liberal back then, including on questions of separation of church and state.

“As a college student at Emory when the Supreme Court ruled that prayer was unconstitutional … I didn't notice it,” he said in a 2009 interview. “As a graduate student at Tulane I probably would have said it's a good decision.”

‘I don’t think his faith was the driving force’

After Tulane, Gingrich took a job as a history professor outside Atlanta and almost immediately began running for Congress, losing two races in the mid-’70s.

Around that time he joined New Hope Baptist Church, a 100-year old congregation south of Atlanta where Ike Reighard had recently arrived as the senior pastor.

“He had just lost for the second time and he came in and said, ‘I need your help,’” says Reighard. “I said, ‘What did you want to do in politics?’ He said he wanted to be speaker of the House.”

Gingrich won his next race for Congress in 1978. That year also marked the birth of the modern Christian Right.

The movement started in opposition to an Internal Revenue Service campaign under then-President Jimmy Carter to crack down on private schools resisting court-ordered desegregation.

Word of the campaign provoked fear and outrage among evangelical schools. Jerry Falwell joined the successful effort to thwart the IRS initiative and founded the Moral Majority the following year, in 1979. The group’s focus on fighting abortion and gay rights set the Christian Right agenda for decades to come.

Gingrich, for his part, was not considered part of the new wave of proud Christian Right warriors in Congress, some of whom were swept into power in 1980 on President Ronald Reagan’s coattails and enthusiastically blended their religious faith and politics.

For Gingrich, “I don’t think faith was the driving force,” says Reighard. “He realized that you have to look at issues and they can’t always be driven by your personal views and your religious values.”

“I heard a lot of times that people say evangelicals are one-issue people, all about abortion,” Reighard says. “But that’s not true with Gingrich. Education was important for him. Health care was important. The economy was important.”

Indeed, when Gingrich launched the Conservative Opportunity Society, an influential House caucus, in 1983, he focused on fiscal issues and practical electoral politics.

And yet Gingrich was an early ally of the budding Christian Right, even if he wasn’t a card-carrying member.

Ralph Reed, who would go on to lead the Christian Coalition, remembers watching as a libertarian activist advocating for gay rights and abortion rights challenged Gingrich at an early 1980s College Republicans breakfast.

“Newt pushed back hard,” Reed remembers. “It was clearly a position of intellectual conviction. I wasn’t yet a committed Christian and I remember finding that pretty remarkable, that Newt didn’t try to pacify this guy. He said, ‘No, you’re wrong.’”

Gingrich speaking at a 1987 news conference.

The future House speaker also stayed active at New Hope Baptist Church, which was quickly growing from sleepy country congregation to suburban Atlanta megachurch, even as he spent most of his time in Washington. When Reighard’s wife died during childbirth, Gingrich was on the phone with him while the pastor was still at the hospital.

“He was always there on Sunday mornings,” says Reighard, recalling Gingrich’s House years. “And the other thing he was always great at doing was town-hall-type meetings and potluck dinners. He was a grassroots person. There’s no telling how many of those meals I prayed at.”

Christian coalitions

But a lot of those town halls were more political than religious. Televangelist Pat Robertson launched the Christian Coalition in the early 1990s, and the group organized events around Georgia aimed at getting conservative evangelicals more involved in elections.

Gingrich, who counted himself an evangelical, expressed keen interest in the coalition’s work. But he seemed to be operating less as a pious Christian, and more as a strategist looking for ways the GOP could win the House of Representatives.

“We didn’t get into theological conversations that much,” says Patrick Gartland, executive director of the Georgia Christian Coalition in the early 1990s. “I was a grassroots numbers person. I loved the intricacies of grassroots, and he did, too, and he understood it.”

Unlike the Moral Majority in the 1980s, which was made up of pastors like Falwell, the Christian Coalition sought to mainstream the Christian Right by bringing in laypeople. The group’s local chapters were led by Christian business leaders, teachers and retirees, as opposed to pastors.

And Christian Coalition envisioned a big-tent religious conservatism that was as much about lowering taxes as it was about banning abortion.

For the broad-minded Gingrich, that vision was a perfect fit – especially after the Christian Coalition helped usher in the 1994 Republican Revolution, which put the House in GOP hands for the first time in 40 years.

The takeover catapulted Gingrich to speaker of the House, making him the country’s most powerful Republican. He vowed to pay attention to conservative Christians from his first day on the job, seeking to assuage evangelical activists who felt ignored by the Reagan administration after they’d worked hard for Reagan’s political campaigns.

“There was this dissatisfaction among evangelical leaders about [Reagan], and Newt said to me, ‘I’m not going to let that happen.’”

Best remembered for working with President Bill Clinton on fiscally focused deals like welfare reform and balancing the budget - and fiscal fights that led to a government shutdown - Gingrich also checked off major items on religious conservatives’ wish lists.

He brought a proposed constitutional amendment to allow school prayer up for a House vote. He presided over the adoption of the Partial Birth Abortion Ban Act – the first abortion restriction since Roe v. Wade – and the Defense of Marriage Act, which forbids the federal government from recognizing gay marriage.

Speaker-elect Gingrich with then-wife Marianne and his mother Kathleen at a January 1995 Washington church service.

Yet some evangelical leaders who knew Gingrich fretted over his personal life. The hard-charging speaker displayed braggadocio and rough edges even to political allies and didn’t talk much about his own faith.

“There were a lot of conservative Christian leaders who really loved Newt but felt like he hadn’t really turned his life over to God,” says Reed.

Many of those leaders went nuclear over rumors about Gingrich’s 1998 affair with a young House aide named Callista Bisek, while he was married to his second wife, Marianne.

Theose rumors “would break my heart,” says Reighard, who counseled Gingrich and Marianne in the 1990s. “I always believed that Newt could be one of the great leaders in our country, an American version of Winston Churchill.”

Reborn a Catholic

More than a decade later, Gingrich is back in many evangelicals’ good graces, with polls showing him way out in front of Romney among evangelicals in Iowa, who accounted for 60% of caucus-goers four years ago.

What explains the turnaround?

One big factor is Gingrich’s self-described faith awakening since leaving Congress in 1998. A personal turning point was 2002, when a court ruling struck down the recitation of the Pledge of Allegiance in public schools because of its “Under God” clause.

“That was the last straw,” Gingrich said in a 2009 interview with U.S. News & World Report. “And I said it’s time to challenge head-on secular domination in the West.”

Just as studying political history had led a 20-something Gingrich to the Saint Charles Avenue Baptist Church in New Orleans, political developments like the Pledge ruling and other perceived attacks on religion sparked a round of soul-searching.

Though it was later struck down by the Supreme Court, the ruling led Gingrich to publish “Rediscovering God in America,” a faith-based walking tour of Washington’s key buildings and monuments.

For those close to him, the 2006 book reflected what Gingrich had been preaching for more than a decade: that religion played a key role in the nation’s founding.

“In the ’90s, he talked about this idea that power comes from God to the individual and is loaned to the state,” says Rick Tyler, Gingrich’s former spokesman. “Before that, the European model was that power came from God to the king, and [Gingrich] used to explain why that was corrupt and how Thomas Jefferson turned it on his head.”

By increasing his public attack on the secular “media-academic-legal elite” and promoting his God-infused take on American history, Gingrich was branded a culture warrior during the last decade, gaining appeal among conservative evangelicals.

Gingrich continued the courtship by regularly appearing before audiences of hundreds of evangelical pastors to talk about God, history and politics.

Gingrich delivers the Liberty University commencement address in 2007 following Jerry Falwell

“There’s no question there’s been an evolution in his thinking and speaking and writing on America’s religious heritage, which has become a much bigger part of his lexicon,” says Reed, who leads the Faith and Freedom Coalition and is not endorsing any presidential candidates.

“He’s clearly found his voice on social issues, and less than 30 days from the Iowa caucuses the timing couldn’t be better.”

Gingrich further strengthened ties to grassroots evangelicals in 2009, launching a group aimed at bringing together religious and economic conservatives.

The organization, Renewing American Leadership, poured $150,000 into a successful Iowa campaign to unseat judges who had legalized gay marriage in the state. Many of the Iowa activists who led that 2010 campaign are now bullish on Gingrich.

Admitting to an affair also helped.

At a closed-door meeting with the nation’s top Christian Right leaders ahead of the 2008 election, Gingrich was asked about reports he’d been having an affair while leading the impeachment drive against Clinton after the Monica Lewinsky scandal.

The former speaker owned up to the affair and said it marked one the most shameful periods of his life, a time in which he was “alienated from God,” according to a participant at the meeting who spoke on condition of anonymity.

Though he didn’t run for president in 2008, Gingrich went on James Dobson’s Focus on the Family radio show to admit the affair to the evangelical icon and a national audience: “There's certainly times when I've fallen short of God's standards.”

Gingrich told listeners he’d since turned "to God to receive forgiveness and to receive mercy."

For many evangelicals, the admission and penitent tone struck a chord.

“It all depends on whether Newt has been rewired, in the theological sense of being born again,” says David Lane, an influential evangelical activist who is in regular contact with Gingrich.

“I was one of the wildest men who ever lived, loved women, wine and song, and I came to Christ,” Lane says. “I’m not perfect, but I read the Bible seven days a week. Is Newt a new man? I think he is. There’s something different about him.”

One difference is that, for the last two years, Gingrich has been an active Roman Catholic. He has described his conversion as a decade-long process inspired by Callista, who sings with a choir at the country’s largest Catholic church, Washington’s Basilica of the National Shrine of the Immaculate Conception.

Gingrich has said that years of attending Mass there rubbed off on him, with Pope Benedict XVI’s 2008 visit providing the final impetus to conversion.

Gingrich was especially drawn to the church’s millennia-long history and intellectualism. Discussing one of his visits to St. Peter’s Basilica in Rome, Gingrich has said, “You stand there and you think, this is where St. Peter was crucified. This is where Paul preached.

“You think to yourself, 2,000 years ago the Apostles set out to create a worldwide movement by witnessing to the historic truth they had experienced,” Gingrich said in 2009. “And there it is.”

As opposed to being a letdown to evangelical leaders, Gingrich’s conversion away from evangelical Christianity was received as something like a born-again experience.

“Prior to that, he was a sloppy Baptist who didn’t have a clue about what he believed,” says an evangelical activist who is close to Gingrich. “When he converted, he went through Catechism and had to get his faith straight. It took some of the sloppiness out.”

But Gingrich still has to convince some religious leaders he has straightened out morally.

In his letter to Gingrich urging a speech about his marital history, the Southern Baptist Convention’s Land told Gingrich to emphasize his own religious narrative.

“I know something of your faith journey over the past 20 years,” Land wrote. “Do not hesitate to weave that into your speech to the degree that you are comfortable doing so. It will always resonate with evangelical Christians.”

If polls are to be believed, the story of Gingrich’s journey is resonating already.

- CNN Belief Blog Co-Editor

Filed under: Baptist • Catholic Church • Lutheran • Newt Gingrich • Politics • Pope Benedict XVI • Vatican

soundoff (1,901 Responses)
  1. Ungodly Discipline

    These are all really sound posts. Usually there is just a bunch of crap on here.

    December 11, 2011 at 11:36 am |
    • The Canadian, ...eyh...

      Hey watch it Un...I could just turn into "george" in a flash...well...maybe not. I couldn't even pretend to be that stupid.

      December 11, 2011 at 11:51 am |
    • Ungodly Discipline


      December 11, 2011 at 11:57 am |
  2. Another Chris

    Good lord, this country is so stupid I can't even believe it anymore. Why does religion even play any role whatsoever in considering a candidate?

    December 11, 2011 at 11:36 am |
  3. Lu

    Christians want the candidates to grovel before the priest caste before acceptance....

    December 11, 2011 at 11:35 am |

    I am VERY curious if Pastors and Megachurch leaders will stick their neck out and endorse NOOT....

    December 11, 2011 at 11:34 am |
    • bluemax77

      I DON’T..!!

      December 11, 2011 at 3:09 pm |
  5. John Richardson

    The manipulators are about to let themselves be manipulated – again! Yeah, go crash and burn with old Newt, evangelicals!

    December 11, 2011 at 11:32 am |
  6. gwats

    Gingrich is still out there, doing his snake oil salesman thing, and will never change. Go ahead, select him to face Obama in February, and see what happens.

    December 11, 2011 at 11:32 am |
  7. Mark Holm

    How much or how often Newt repents isn't the big Newt problem. The problem is that he is erratic, unreliable, prone to saying, and apparently, believing outrageous, half baked ideas. He is expert at saying foolish things that outrage both his friends and his enemies. Not presidential material. Not even close.

    December 11, 2011 at 11:31 am |
  8. Rainer Braendlein

    "'The woman at the well was fortunate she encountered Jesus that day instead of some of our evangelical brethren,' the Liberty University president wrote, in an apparent swipe at Land."

    This is what we need: An encounter with the living Jesus.

    The evangelicals tell us that we need to be "born again". They claim someone, who believes that Jesus has borne his sins on the cross, is born again. It seems to go together with the content of the Bible.

    I claim that the true biblical doctrine is different from the "born again"-doctrine.

    According to the Bible, we have to get born from above (not born again). We need a real encounter with Jesus Christ. People at Jesus lifetime on earth were set free or released by an encounter with the visible Jesus. The words, which he spoke to them, were powerful and supernatural. In fact, people had a talk with the living God, when they talked with Jesus.

    Sometimes Jesus used the term: "Follow me!" The disciples of Christ became able to follow Jesus in the power of this divine call (follow me!). By their natural power the disciples had not been able to follow Jesus (the apostles had no need to receive the sacramental baptism, because they were "baptized" by Jesus' divine call).

    Today Jesus is invisible (but yet still real). How can we encounter Jesus today and receive his releasing call?

    Today Jesus calls us by the sacramental or Holy Baptism. Baptism is the locus in space and time, ordered by God, where we get connected with the releasing power of Jesus' death and resurrection.

    Sadly the evangelicals have reduced baptism to a mere symbolic act. They claim baptism would merely be a public confession of the faith by people, which have started to believe.

    In actual fact God acts during baptism and it is much more than a symbolic act. Baptism is the holy fountain, where we get born by Water and Spirit. Nearterms and in connection with baptism God gives us the Holy Spirit, which enables us to live a righteous life. By the power of the Spirit we can overcome the acts of our sinful flesh or our carnal desires.

    Please note: The call of the visible Jesus is is equivalent to the sacramental baptism of the Christian Church (Bonhoeffer figured out this).

    The practical application: Christians could sometimes doubt, if they really had the saving faith. If they cannot overcome a certain sin, they fear to belong to the people which are predeterminded for damnation, which God doesn't give the faith. By sacramental baptism this problem gets solved. After s. baptism someone is a believer and all what remains is just obedience. There is no more excuse for disobedience. After sacramental baptism we keep the faith by obedience or obedience is our visible inner faith.

    December 11, 2011 at 11:31 am |
    • Another Chris

      It's such a shame to see intelligence wasted on Jesus.

      December 11, 2011 at 11:40 am |
    • Hypatia

      Sugar, I learned all that in Sunday School at age 11, prepping for Confirmation. What, pray tell, does it have to do with a lying panderer like Gingrich?

      December 11, 2011 at 11:45 am |
    • The Canadian, ...eyh...

      What a beautiful name .... Hypatia.....!

      December 11, 2011 at 11:53 am |
  9. Rajeev G

    Newt does not change...he change roles depending on who is paying for his services!

    December 11, 2011 at 11:30 am |
  10. The Evangelicals are Hypocrites

    Other than the fact that he divides people, he is a consummate tribalist. We don't need any conservatives in the White House. The country is too diverse now. For the Evangelicals to give Newt a pass underscores the hypocrisy of the Religious Reich. They are just Political Clergymen giving absolution to a bottom dweller.

    December 11, 2011 at 11:30 am |
  11. Lou AZ

    Of course he can't be forgiven. All the religions and churches derive their membership from fear, guilt, and reminding everyone that your really not good enough for their god. Hallejulia !

    December 11, 2011 at 11:30 am |
    • Lou AZ

      You're not your. Sorry. (spelling is so all the words don't look alike)

      December 11, 2011 at 11:34 am |
  12. Joe

    Gee, if Obama could repent being black, the evangelicals would embrace him as president for life.

    December 11, 2011 at 11:29 am |
  13. Veritas

    I am skeptical if someone like Gingrich is actually religious or if it's just something he wears to attract the vote of the delusional "evangelicals"...

    December 11, 2011 at 11:29 am |
  14. Nick

    This says more about the integrity of the evangelical community than it does about Gingrich. We're already crystal clear about Mr. Gingrich's lack of integrity.

    December 11, 2011 at 11:28 am |
    • El Flaco

      The leadership of the Evangelical Protestants is utterly corrupt. They are power-hungry, money-hungry, shallow, not well educated, not well read, not very smart, and exclusively self-interested. Many of them, I'm sure, actually believe that God is telling them what to do. Joseph Smith may have believed after a while that God really did inspire him to write the Book of Mormon, but the Book of Mormon is still just a bunch of baloney.

      The Evangelical Christians who follow them have been duped.

      December 11, 2011 at 11:37 am |
  15. El Flaco

    It doesn't really matter which Conservative gets the nomination. All Conservatives are the same. They all want to destroy the federal government, eliminate the economic safety net, reduce middle class wages, eliminate middle class benefits, and outsource middle class jobs. Those are Conservatism's stated goals. That's what 'free market' means.

    December 11, 2011 at 11:28 am |
  16. Nick San Diego

    I;m an Obama supporter, but Ron Paul would give me pause . He's the only one in this field that talks sense and could possibly get my vote.

    December 11, 2011 at 11:28 am |
    • clwyd

      Ever see the signs of Alzheimer's?

      December 11, 2011 at 11:37 am |
    • El Flaco

      You're not an Obama supporter. You are a Libertarian who has supported Ron Paul for years and your posts are a transparent attempt at manipulating opinion.

      Ron Paul is a looney, and a Libertarian government would destroy life as we know it. Libertarians believe that the poor have too much money and the rich have too little.

      December 11, 2011 at 11:40 am |
  17. James

    If he can't keep his own household together then how is he going to lead out country...We need leaders who are servants to the people, not leaders who do things for themselves....Our leaders do not have a clue, lets start giving more power to our states, who know our problems on a local level, and make our leaders and CEO's accountable for their actions...The definition for Idot- is doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different result...You want change! Its time to clean up our government and clean house...We are supporting too many people who if they could work wouldn't...and its always been the same middle class people who support the rest...If you don't work you don't eat! But if you try and contribute then will feed you....I say if you work then you deserve food allottment, housing subsidies, and tax breaks...If you don't work then you do not deserve a large screen TV paid by the government...My rule to my kids was, if you work I'll help you, if you don't work you get nothing...Geezeee....What a mess were in...

    December 11, 2011 at 11:27 am |
  18. Istehak

    Never know Ron Paul could be so interesting, I think he is really honest.

    December 11, 2011 at 11:27 am |
    • clwyd

      Honest or suffering from Alzheimer's?

      December 11, 2011 at 11:35 am |
    • Another Chris

      An honest idiot

      December 11, 2011 at 11:39 am |
  19. Veritas

    It's striking to me how self proclaimed "christians" are so often the most evil, intolerant, disgraceful, selfish and hateful people you'll ever meet. Religion brings out the worst in people.

    December 11, 2011 at 11:26 am |
  20. Jilli

    Are religious people just gullible by nature, or does their belief in religion make them gullible?

    December 11, 2011 at 11:26 am |
    • Ungodly Discipline

      What came first, the chicken or the GOP

      December 11, 2011 at 11:32 am |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44
About this blog

The CNN Belief Blog covers the faith angles of the day's biggest stories, from breaking news to politics to entertainment, fostering a global conversation about the role of religion and belief in readers' lives. It's edited by CNN's Daniel Burke with contributions from Eric Marrapodi and CNN's worldwide news gathering team.