Newt Gingrich’s faith journey: How a thrice-married Catholic became an evangelical darling
Newt Gingrich has spent time as a Lutheran, a Baptist and a Roman Catholic.
December 10th, 2011
10:00 PM ET

Newt Gingrich’s faith journey: How a thrice-married Catholic became an evangelical darling

By Dan Gilgoff, CNN.com Religion Editor

Editor’s note: This is part of an occasional series of stories looking at the faith of the leading 2012 presidential candidates, including Mitt Romney, Rick Perry and Newt Gingrich. We also profiled the faith journey of Herman Cain before he suspended his campaign.

(CNN) - There’s an e-mail war raging among some of the nation’s leading evangelicals over whether Newt Gingrich has repented enough for his sins to be president.

One recent skirmish was set off by an open letter urging Gingrich to give a major speech confronting his perceived moral stumbles, including an affair with his third wife, Callista, while married to No. 2.

“You need to make it as clear as you possibly can that you deeply regret your past actions and that you do understand the anguish and suffering they caused others, including your former spouses,” Richard Land, public policy chief for the Southern Baptist Convention, wrote.

Land urged Gingrich to make a public promise “that there will be no moral scandals in a Gingrich White House.”

Rather than galvanizing the faithful, however, Land’s letter provoked an outcry from a handful of evangelical leaders who argued Gingrich has repented enough and deserves forgiveness.

On an e-mail thread among conservative Christian heavyweights, Jerry Falwell Jr. invoked the biblical story of a woman of ill repute who met Jesus at a well. Though the woman had been married five times, Jesus forgave her.

“The woman at the well was fortunate she encountered Jesus that day instead of some of our evangelical brethren,” the Liberty University president wrote, in an apparent swipe at Land.

On the same e-mail chain, which CNN obtained from a conservative activist, prominent Atlanta preacher Richard Lee said the nation’s evangelicals needed to support Gingrich.

Lee called Gingrich “the only forceful Christian candidate who can at this point be elected and cleanse the White House next November.”

The evangelical tussling over Gingrich says a lot about the fractured state of the Republican Party less than a month before the Iowa caucuses officially usher in the 2012 race for the White House.

The sight of influential evangelicals rallying around Gingrich, a Catholic with serious “values” baggage, speaks to the huge political vulnerability of Mitt Romney, who was the perceived GOP front-runner until recent polls put Gingrich at the front of the pack.

Gingrich speaking at the April 2011 National Catholic Prayer Breakfast in D.C.

Whether because of Romney’s past liberalism on gay rights and abortion or because of his Mormon faith, many of the evangelical Christians who make up the Republican base just don’t like him.

They’ve been looking for an alternative, by turns telling pollsters of their support for Michele Bachmann, then Rick Perry, then Herman Cain. One by one, they’ve dropped in the polls, or out of the race altogether. Now it’s Gingrich’s turn in the spotlight.

But the argument over Gingrich’s personal life also raises fundamental questions about the candidate himself and his readiness for the nation’s highest office.

Just how much has Gingrich changed since his days as a volatile and philandering House speaker? Does he have the character to be president? And, at least for many of the evangelical voters who will dominate the early primaries: Is he a true believer?

Faith by geography

Gingrich has identified with different branches of Christianity that mirror his surroundings at different stages of life.

Born near Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, an area settled by the largely Lutheran Pennsylvania Dutch, Gingrich was the son of a Lutheran mom and a Pennsylvania Dutch stepfather who adopted him.

Attending college at Atlanta’s Emory University and grad school at Tulane University in New Orleans, Gingrich became a Southern Baptist.

And as a creature of Washington, where Gingrich’s wife sings in a Catholic choir and where many prominent conservative Republicans have converted to Catholicism in the last decade, Gingrich joined the Catholic fold in 2009.

“I think that was all part of his pilgrimage,” says Ike Reighard, who was Gingrich’s pastor in Atlanta for nearly 20 years. “Whatever is the dominant religion in the region he was in, that was his progression... He was always super inquisitive, searching for deeper meaning.”

Gingrich’s stepdad was an army officer, making for a peripatetic family life that included stretches spent at military bases in Europe and at Fort Benning, Georgia, situated in the heart of the Bible Belt.

Gingrich, who declined interview requests for this story, was raised largely by his maternal grandmother, a devout Lutheran who, he has said, “taught me my most basic lessons about God and Satan.”

But Gingrich left his childhood denomination through an immersion baptism at the Saint Charles Avenue Baptist Church in New Orleans while at Tulane, where he was pursuing a Ph.D. in European history.

In a pattern that would last a lifetime, studying religion’s role in history and politics moved Gingrich to deepen his own faith.

Saint Charles Avenue’s pastor, G. Avery Lee, said Gingrich wasn’t a member of any church when the two first met.

“He said that in his study of political theory, he noted how much influence the church had had … and asked if I could explain,” Lee wrote in a 1994 letter to the New Orleans Times-Picayune, describing his first encounter with Gingrich.

Lee and Gingrich grew close, with the pastor eventually baptizing Gingrich even though his church took “a liberal approach to both theology and sociology.”

“It has been suggested by some that in baptizing him, I didn't hold him under long enough,” Wrote Lee, who died in 2009, in apparent reference to Gingrich’s conservative politics.

But Gingrich was more liberal back then, including on questions of separation of church and state.

“As a college student at Emory when the Supreme Court ruled that prayer was unconstitutional … I didn't notice it,” he said in a 2009 interview. “As a graduate student at Tulane I probably would have said it's a good decision.”

‘I don’t think his faith was the driving force’

After Tulane, Gingrich took a job as a history professor outside Atlanta and almost immediately began running for Congress, losing two races in the mid-’70s.

Around that time he joined New Hope Baptist Church, a 100-year old congregation south of Atlanta where Ike Reighard had recently arrived as the senior pastor.

“He had just lost for the second time and he came in and said, ‘I need your help,’” says Reighard. “I said, ‘What did you want to do in politics?’ He said he wanted to be speaker of the House.”

Gingrich won his next race for Congress in 1978. That year also marked the birth of the modern Christian Right.

The movement started in opposition to an Internal Revenue Service campaign under then-President Jimmy Carter to crack down on private schools resisting court-ordered desegregation.

Word of the campaign provoked fear and outrage among evangelical schools. Jerry Falwell joined the successful effort to thwart the IRS initiative and founded the Moral Majority the following year, in 1979. The group’s focus on fighting abortion and gay rights set the Christian Right agenda for decades to come.

Gingrich, for his part, was not considered part of the new wave of proud Christian Right warriors in Congress, some of whom were swept into power in 1980 on President Ronald Reagan’s coattails and enthusiastically blended their religious faith and politics.

For Gingrich, “I don’t think faith was the driving force,” says Reighard. “He realized that you have to look at issues and they can’t always be driven by your personal views and your religious values.”

“I heard a lot of times that people say evangelicals are one-issue people, all about abortion,” Reighard says. “But that’s not true with Gingrich. Education was important for him. Health care was important. The economy was important.”

Indeed, when Gingrich launched the Conservative Opportunity Society, an influential House caucus, in 1983, he focused on fiscal issues and practical electoral politics.

And yet Gingrich was an early ally of the budding Christian Right, even if he wasn’t a card-carrying member.

Ralph Reed, who would go on to lead the Christian Coalition, remembers watching as a libertarian activist advocating for gay rights and abortion rights challenged Gingrich at an early 1980s College Republicans breakfast.

“Newt pushed back hard,” Reed remembers. “It was clearly a position of intellectual conviction. I wasn’t yet a committed Christian and I remember finding that pretty remarkable, that Newt didn’t try to pacify this guy. He said, ‘No, you’re wrong.’”

Gingrich speaking at a 1987 news conference.

The future House speaker also stayed active at New Hope Baptist Church, which was quickly growing from sleepy country congregation to suburban Atlanta megachurch, even as he spent most of his time in Washington. When Reighard’s wife died during childbirth, Gingrich was on the phone with him while the pastor was still at the hospital.

“He was always there on Sunday mornings,” says Reighard, recalling Gingrich’s House years. “And the other thing he was always great at doing was town-hall-type meetings and potluck dinners. He was a grassroots person. There’s no telling how many of those meals I prayed at.”

Christian coalitions

But a lot of those town halls were more political than religious. Televangelist Pat Robertson launched the Christian Coalition in the early 1990s, and the group organized events around Georgia aimed at getting conservative evangelicals more involved in elections.

Gingrich, who counted himself an evangelical, expressed keen interest in the coalition’s work. But he seemed to be operating less as a pious Christian, and more as a strategist looking for ways the GOP could win the House of Representatives.

“We didn’t get into theological conversations that much,” says Patrick Gartland, executive director of the Georgia Christian Coalition in the early 1990s. “I was a grassroots numbers person. I loved the intricacies of grassroots, and he did, too, and he understood it.”

Unlike the Moral Majority in the 1980s, which was made up of pastors like Falwell, the Christian Coalition sought to mainstream the Christian Right by bringing in laypeople. The group’s local chapters were led by Christian business leaders, teachers and retirees, as opposed to pastors.

And Christian Coalition envisioned a big-tent religious conservatism that was as much about lowering taxes as it was about banning abortion.

For the broad-minded Gingrich, that vision was a perfect fit – especially after the Christian Coalition helped usher in the 1994 Republican Revolution, which put the House in GOP hands for the first time in 40 years.

The takeover catapulted Gingrich to speaker of the House, making him the country’s most powerful Republican. He vowed to pay attention to conservative Christians from his first day on the job, seeking to assuage evangelical activists who felt ignored by the Reagan administration after they’d worked hard for Reagan’s political campaigns.

“There was this dissatisfaction among evangelical leaders about [Reagan], and Newt said to me, ‘I’m not going to let that happen.’”

Best remembered for working with President Bill Clinton on fiscally focused deals like welfare reform and balancing the budget - and fiscal fights that led to a government shutdown - Gingrich also checked off major items on religious conservatives’ wish lists.

He brought a proposed constitutional amendment to allow school prayer up for a House vote. He presided over the adoption of the Partial Birth Abortion Ban Act – the first abortion restriction since Roe v. Wade – and the Defense of Marriage Act, which forbids the federal government from recognizing gay marriage.

Speaker-elect Gingrich with then-wife Marianne and his mother Kathleen at a January 1995 Washington church service.

Yet some evangelical leaders who knew Gingrich fretted over his personal life. The hard-charging speaker displayed braggadocio and rough edges even to political allies and didn’t talk much about his own faith.

“There were a lot of conservative Christian leaders who really loved Newt but felt like he hadn’t really turned his life over to God,” says Reed.

Many of those leaders went nuclear over rumors about Gingrich’s 1998 affair with a young House aide named Callista Bisek, while he was married to his second wife, Marianne.

Theose rumors “would break my heart,” says Reighard, who counseled Gingrich and Marianne in the 1990s. “I always believed that Newt could be one of the great leaders in our country, an American version of Winston Churchill.”

Reborn a Catholic

More than a decade later, Gingrich is back in many evangelicals’ good graces, with polls showing him way out in front of Romney among evangelicals in Iowa, who accounted for 60% of caucus-goers four years ago.

What explains the turnaround?

One big factor is Gingrich’s self-described faith awakening since leaving Congress in 1998. A personal turning point was 2002, when a court ruling struck down the recitation of the Pledge of Allegiance in public schools because of its “Under God” clause.

“That was the last straw,” Gingrich said in a 2009 interview with U.S. News & World Report. “And I said it’s time to challenge head-on secular domination in the West.”

Just as studying political history had led a 20-something Gingrich to the Saint Charles Avenue Baptist Church in New Orleans, political developments like the Pledge ruling and other perceived attacks on religion sparked a round of soul-searching.

Though it was later struck down by the Supreme Court, the ruling led Gingrich to publish “Rediscovering God in America,” a faith-based walking tour of Washington’s key buildings and monuments.

For those close to him, the 2006 book reflected what Gingrich had been preaching for more than a decade: that religion played a key role in the nation’s founding.

“In the ’90s, he talked about this idea that power comes from God to the individual and is loaned to the state,” says Rick Tyler, Gingrich’s former spokesman. “Before that, the European model was that power came from God to the king, and [Gingrich] used to explain why that was corrupt and how Thomas Jefferson turned it on his head.”

By increasing his public attack on the secular “media-academic-legal elite” and promoting his God-infused take on American history, Gingrich was branded a culture warrior during the last decade, gaining appeal among conservative evangelicals.

Gingrich continued the courtship by regularly appearing before audiences of hundreds of evangelical pastors to talk about God, history and politics.

Gingrich delivers the Liberty University commencement address in 2007 following Jerry Falwell

“There’s no question there’s been an evolution in his thinking and speaking and writing on America’s religious heritage, which has become a much bigger part of his lexicon,” says Reed, who leads the Faith and Freedom Coalition and is not endorsing any presidential candidates.

“He’s clearly found his voice on social issues, and less than 30 days from the Iowa caucuses the timing couldn’t be better.”

Gingrich further strengthened ties to grassroots evangelicals in 2009, launching a group aimed at bringing together religious and economic conservatives.

The organization, Renewing American Leadership, poured $150,000 into a successful Iowa campaign to unseat judges who had legalized gay marriage in the state. Many of the Iowa activists who led that 2010 campaign are now bullish on Gingrich.

Admitting to an affair also helped.

At a closed-door meeting with the nation’s top Christian Right leaders ahead of the 2008 election, Gingrich was asked about reports he’d been having an affair while leading the impeachment drive against Clinton after the Monica Lewinsky scandal.

The former speaker owned up to the affair and said it marked one the most shameful periods of his life, a time in which he was “alienated from God,” according to a participant at the meeting who spoke on condition of anonymity.

Though he didn’t run for president in 2008, Gingrich went on James Dobson’s Focus on the Family radio show to admit the affair to the evangelical icon and a national audience: “There's certainly times when I've fallen short of God's standards.”

Gingrich told listeners he’d since turned "to God to receive forgiveness and to receive mercy."

For many evangelicals, the admission and penitent tone struck a chord.

“It all depends on whether Newt has been rewired, in the theological sense of being born again,” says David Lane, an influential evangelical activist who is in regular contact with Gingrich.

“I was one of the wildest men who ever lived, loved women, wine and song, and I came to Christ,” Lane says. “I’m not perfect, but I read the Bible seven days a week. Is Newt a new man? I think he is. There’s something different about him.”

One difference is that, for the last two years, Gingrich has been an active Roman Catholic. He has described his conversion as a decade-long process inspired by Callista, who sings with a choir at the country’s largest Catholic church, Washington’s Basilica of the National Shrine of the Immaculate Conception.

Gingrich has said that years of attending Mass there rubbed off on him, with Pope Benedict XVI’s 2008 visit providing the final impetus to conversion.

Gingrich was especially drawn to the church’s millennia-long history and intellectualism. Discussing one of his visits to St. Peter’s Basilica in Rome, Gingrich has said, “You stand there and you think, this is where St. Peter was crucified. This is where Paul preached.

“You think to yourself, 2,000 years ago the Apostles set out to create a worldwide movement by witnessing to the historic truth they had experienced,” Gingrich said in 2009. “And there it is.”

As opposed to being a letdown to evangelical leaders, Gingrich’s conversion away from evangelical Christianity was received as something like a born-again experience.

“Prior to that, he was a sloppy Baptist who didn’t have a clue about what he believed,” says an evangelical activist who is close to Gingrich. “When he converted, he went through Catechism and had to get his faith straight. It took some of the sloppiness out.”

But Gingrich still has to convince some religious leaders he has straightened out morally.

In his letter to Gingrich urging a speech about his marital history, the Southern Baptist Convention’s Land told Gingrich to emphasize his own religious narrative.

“I know something of your faith journey over the past 20 years,” Land wrote. “Do not hesitate to weave that into your speech to the degree that you are comfortable doing so. It will always resonate with evangelical Christians.”

If polls are to be believed, the story of Gingrich’s journey is resonating already.

- CNN Belief Blog Co-Editor

Filed under: Baptist • Catholic Church • Lutheran • Newt Gingrich • Politics • Pope Benedict XVI • Vatican

soundoff (1,901 Responses)
  1. Dianna

    I don't trust him but then, I don't trust any of them. I think I mistrust him the most.

    December 11, 2011 at 11:54 am |
    • jennynewyear

      team. Newt and Romney are excatly what is WRONG with our country - corrupt government officials in bed with the capitalist elite. Ron Paul and Rick Santorum seem to be intelligent, genuine fellows. They would make a good and honorable Pres/VP. I've been Googling Ron Paul's press interviews and he makes a lot of sense. There are no questions at all about his ethics, his convictions, his morals, or his faith. Plus he understands ecomomics and monetary policy like no other candidate up there. He's not real smooth, or real pretty, but he is genuine..

      December 11, 2011 at 12:11 pm |
  2. Ken

    I am not divisible. My faith directs ALL aspects of my life – all of my values. My faith directs how I interact with family, neighbors and strangers. It directs how I interact with my clients, coworkers, and vendors at work. It is ridiculous for all of the atheists who dominate this "Belief" Blog to repeat over and over again ad nauseum that folks should somehow check their faith at the door when they enter the polling place. Anyone who could do that has no real abiding faith to begin with.

    December 11, 2011 at 11:54 am |
    • zip

      Real Christians vote Democrat

      December 11, 2011 at 11:57 am |
    • TC

      Any Christian who is a strict Dem voter is on the more initellectual side of things and believes your faith can be separated from law and land.

      December 11, 2011 at 12:00 pm |
    • Ken

      God is not a Democrat – or a Republican. NONE of these candidates – Democratic or Republican – seem to me to advocate true Christian policies.

      BTW, I voted for Obama in 2008. IMO, he has proven to be incredibly dishonest – saying one thing when running for office and then doing the opposite once elected. Not very Christian, IMO. I will not repeat that mistake again. However, that doesn't mean I will be voting for Gingrich or the Republicans, either.

      December 11, 2011 at 12:06 pm |
    • iBELIEVE

      I agree with Ken: Jesus would be neither Dem or Repub.

      December 11, 2011 at 12:24 pm |
  3. chet

    If he repents, that shoujld keep him out of hell. It will not necessarily get elected as president.

    December 11, 2011 at 11:54 am |
  4. Brian

    Isn't repenting and confessing your sins an issue dealt with between you and God. Who are these "Evangelical Leaders" to think that they alone can decide when someone has repented enough. That is God's job not theirs.

    December 11, 2011 at 11:52 am |
    • TC

      Public penance is a necessity for leaders becasue only good leaders admit their humanness in public.

      December 11, 2011 at 12:03 pm |
  5. zip

    Mr. Gingrich?? Jesus is in the lobby, and he looks a liitle angry.

    December 11, 2011 at 11:50 am |
    • jennynewyear

      Newt is a big fat phony lying cheating POCKET STUFFER. Sure I can forgive him, but I wouldn't be dumb enough to trust him or to put him in charge of this nation, even if he was the last man on the planet.

      December 11, 2011 at 12:02 pm |
    • TC

      BUt are any of these clowns really worth voting for? I don;t think so but I have to vote for the least offensive. Sad.

      December 11, 2011 at 12:04 pm |
  6. USMCCapt

    If you want to save the economy, you need to start taxing all of these religious organizations. They are the only ones with any money as evidenced by all of the property they own and the "Taj Mahal" buildings that you see no matter where you travel. Most of them are part of the 1 percent and they don't give back to the economy or do any hiring.

    December 11, 2011 at 11:49 am |
    • Ken

      With views like that, which reflect both prejudice and profound ignorance, I can only hope that you never really were a Marine Corps Captain.

      December 11, 2011 at 11:57 am |
    • getreel

      Amen.....no pun intended. Bill Gates and Warren Buffet, with the huge charitable contributions they make, are subject to tax. How come these pious charlatans get a free ride?? How come so many of them own several properties, autos, etc.? Just total nonsense. Talk about political correctness!

      December 11, 2011 at 11:59 am |
    • TC

      Marine – you are an idiot and ashamed I serve with you. The Catholic church gives back more to the community than any secular organization combined. Grow up ad educate yourself.

      December 11, 2011 at 12:01 pm |
  7. OldMo

    Once you've raised to a certain level in politics, you're probably soulless anyway so the "Christian" routine is pure theatre. And judging by a lot of Christian leaders I've seen on tv, they're putting on a show too.

    December 11, 2011 at 11:49 am |
  8. ron

    We have a President who is a professing Christian and a wonderful family man, but the so-called "family values" crowd would rather vote for an admitted adulterer. They can forgive this guy because he is "conservative." If he were a liberal, he would never be able to repent enough in the eyes of evangelicals. They talk about repentance and forgiveness, but it is really all about conservative politics.

    December 11, 2011 at 11:49 am |
    • TC

      Can't forgive a liberal becasue they are not sorry for how they believe – they separate their faith from their life and job -can't do that.

      December 11, 2011 at 11:59 am |
    • Ken

      There is a difference between a professing Christian and a practicing Christian.

      December 11, 2011 at 12:01 pm |
    • HotAirAce

      Liberals are not the only ones who shed their faith when neccesary. Romney has explicitly said he will not allow his faith to affect him if he becomes president. I've never understood how believers can shed what they would otherwise claim is the most important aspect of their lives, and I also don't understand why anyone would believe them when they say they will.

      December 11, 2011 at 12:06 pm |
    • CMoses

      We have a president who told Planned Parenthood that if one of his daughters became pregnant out of wedlock because of a mistake, that he woul;dn't want them to be punished with a baby. That message will NEVER ring true with the Evangelicals of America.

      December 11, 2011 at 12:20 pm |
  9. hmmm...

    Silliness...Change is not Newts obligation to me. Change in myself is my obligation to others. While we wait for Newt to change, we sit helpless. Rather than wait for the change to come in others, we might want to seek the change in ourselves first. Change or not. The last three years are not years I want repeated. The change I want is who sits in the seat of President. Simple question...Do I want Obama as he is or Newt as he is. I want Newt as he is and I am not going to HOPE for anything.

    December 11, 2011 at 11:48 am |
  10. iBELIEVE

    As a Christian, I can neither condemn nor condone his behaviour

    December 11, 2011 at 11:48 am |
    • TC

      As a Christian you are required to condemn abhorrent behavior but you are not to pass eternal judgment/

      December 11, 2011 at 12:05 pm |
    • iBELIEVE

      what is condemnation but Judgment???

      December 11, 2011 at 12:33 pm |
  11. ja-coffalotte

    Organized religion is a joke, especially Christianity, I mean c'mon man, immaculate conception? Sorry Joseph, somebody hit that. Any of these so called "candidates" professing their "Faith" as a qualification for the POTUS just makes me want to puke.

    December 11, 2011 at 11:43 am |
    • getreel

      That makes 2 of us.

      December 11, 2011 at 12:01 pm |
  12. settino

    i don't care what religion you belong to, how old you are, etc, etc. Serving divorce papers to a wife suffering from cancer in a hospital is creul and unuasual behavior. Not forgivable. It shows where his heat is> What's with you Americans and religion anyway? More scary than the Muslims!

    December 11, 2011 at 11:43 am |
    • CarrotCakeMan

      Fortunately, the "evangelicals" are few in number, and most Americans are on to them now.

      But you're right, there's no real difference between "Christianists" and Muslim terrorists.

      December 11, 2011 at 11:48 am |
    • Utah

      That doesn't make any sense. There are tons of very good hearten Muslims and Christens that give their lives to serve others.

      December 11, 2011 at 12:00 pm |
  13. Carol

    I takes two (2) to make a marriage work so he made mistakes and big ones a lot of men make mistakes and big ones so I would be careful out there THROWING STONES WHEN YOU LIVE IN GLASS HOUSES.

    My ex-husband in on his fourth wife me being is first and he still making the same mistakes and he always will because he simply stupid.

    Ex-wifes he learned what mistakes he made and he seems to have now the most IMPORTANT thing is how will he run Our Country that is what is so important.

    December 11, 2011 at 11:42 am |
  14. Harvey

    I would be afraid of voting for someone who is so religious (no matter what faith) they believe they must repent in order to be elected.

    December 11, 2011 at 11:42 am |
    • getreel


      December 11, 2011 at 12:03 pm |

    It just shows what a load of cr*ap organized religion is. As usual. Think for yourself and you'll see what a hypocritical windbag Ging"Grich" is.

    December 11, 2011 at 11:41 am |
  16. Hypatia

    I don't give a flying rat's hindquarters as to whether or not he 'repented' of his adulterous hypocrisy. I do care greatly that he's already indicated that he wants to gut child labour laws and put the poor to work cleaning schools, that he wants to disenfranchise minorities and wage class warfare until there are two classes: the rich and the serfs. The hell with Gingrich the grinch!

    December 11, 2011 at 11:41 am |
  17. gwats

    Jesus avoided the politics of day, saying that 'His Kingdom was no part of this World". Instead, he attacked the current leadership of the Jewish Congregation for being weak, corrupt, and being more
    interested in themselves and their own goals instead of leading God's Congregation. Sounds a lot like today, when they should guarding their flocks, they are playing politics instead! 'Religion doesn't clean up politics, it's only makes the picture murkier.

    December 11, 2011 at 11:40 am |
  18. Jemmas

    There is supposed to be a separation of church and state. Religion has no place in politics or the running of our country. Every American has their own beliefs, but you should not discount someone just for their religious position. There is a difference between having good morals/values and your religion.

    December 11, 2011 at 11:40 am |
  19. Philojazz

    It concerns me not a whit whether Mr Gingrich has "repented", or whether he is "saved". What matters to me, and what should matter to all voters, is whether he is an honorable man who can be trusted with our country's future. The answer is clearly "No".

    December 11, 2011 at 11:40 am |
  20. iBELIEVE

    How can you support Capital Punishment... and then turn around and vote for NOOT?

    December 11, 2011 at 11:37 am |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44
About this blog

The CNN Belief Blog covers the faith angles of the day's biggest stories, from breaking news to politics to entertainment, fostering a global conversation about the role of religion and belief in readers' lives. It's edited by CNN's Daniel Burke with contributions from Eric Marrapodi and CNN's worldwide news gathering team.