home
RSS
January 7th, 2012
10:00 PM ET

Reversing JFK: Santorum’s bid to marry faith and politics

Editor’s note: This is part of an occasional series of stories looking at the faith of the leading 2012 presidential candidates, including Mitt Romney, Rick Perry and Newt Gingrich. We also profiled the faith journey of Herman Cain before he suspended his campaign.

By Dan Gilgoff and Eric Marrapodi, CNN Belief Blog Co-Editors

(CNN) - It was election night in November 2006, and Rick Santorum had organized a private Catholic Mass in a room at the Omni William Penn Hotel in Pittsburgh. The senator from Pennsylvania had just lost his re-election bid.

The Mass, held just before his concession speech, included a priest and Santorum’s close family and staff. Though the occasion was somber, the soon-to-be-ex-senator aimed for a celebratory mood, said Mark Rodgers, then a top Santorum aide.

“Life is if full of what can be perceived as disappointments or hardships,” Rodgers said, “but Scripture tells followers of Jesus that we approach those situations with joy because there’s ultimate redemption.”

Santorum’s younger brother, Dan, remembers that many attendees - including the senator’s children - were weeping over Santorum’s landslide defeat at the hands of Democrat Bob Casey Jr.

But not the senator.

“You’d think he would have been crushed,” says Dan Santorum. “But he wasn’t even bitter. He didn’t complain. He just said it was God’s plan.

“That’s when I knew he was going to run for president of the United States,” Dan continued. “Because I think that God had another plan for him.”

It’s unclear if Rick Santorum, whose strong finish in the Iowa caucuses has breathed new life into his presidential campaign, interpreted his Senate loss the same way.

Santorum concedes his Senate seat in 2006.

But the hotel Mass, and Santorum’s apparent placidity in the face of an overwhelming defeat, illustrate what confidants say is the key to understanding him as a person and politician: a devout Catholic faith that has deepened dramatically through political and personal battles.

“When I first met him he was an observant Catholic but a fairly privatized one,” says Rodgers, who ran Santorum’s first race for the U.S. House in 1990 and served as a key Santorum aide in Congress for 16 years.

“The journey I saw him on was a gradual awakening to the importance of faith at an operational level within a democracy, the idea that free people need to have a moral foundation.

“The journey was also personal - growing in faith and sharing it with others,” Rodgers says.

Many politicians have ideological concerns about issues like abortion or gay marriage, but “in Santorum’s case, it’s fundamentally religious,” says Richard Land, public policy chief at the Southern Baptist Convention. “That’s the genetic code of his life.”

It’s also the part that most inspires his political backers - among them the Iowa evangelicals who helped fuel his stunning Iowa finish, eight votes behind winner Mitt Romney - and most enrages critics, who take deep offense at Santorum’s views on divisive issues like homosexuality, which he once lumped together with bestiality in a discussion of legal rights.

“I think it’s fair to say that he’s sometimes harsh in the way he makes those arguments,” says Michael Gerson, a speechwriter for former President George W. Bush.

Indeed, even Santorum’s own party is seeing a faith-based split around his presidential campaign, with evangelicals who dominate the primaries in states like Iowa on one side and more establishment Republicans in states like New Hampshire on the other.

As he works to convince skeptical voters he has a real shot at winning the White House, Santorum’s religious faith has emerged as both his chief political asset and his biggest liability.

Kennedy's ‘sealed off’ wall

His Catholicism may have deepened as an adult, but Santorum also has deep Catholic roots.

“Three pictures hung in the home of my devoutly Catholic immigrant grandparents when I was a boy,” he said in a speech last year. “I remember them well: Jesus, Pope Paul VI and John F. Kennedy.”

Santorum attended Mass with his brother, sister and parents virtually every Sunday. “You basically had to be on your deathbed not to go to church,” says Dan Santorum.

Both parents worked in a VA hospital in Butler, Pennsylvania. As teenagers, Rick and Dan would push the wheelchairs of patients to Sunday Mass in the hospital’s interfaith chapel. Rick would serve the Mass as an altar boy, wheel patients up to receive Holy Communion, then help his brother wheel them back to their hospital rooms.

Other than that, it was a conventional American Catholic upbringing in the 1960s and ’70s: The Santorums said grace before meals, sent their kids to Catholic grade school and spent absolutely no time discussing how religion influenced their public policy views.

American Catholics at the time were living in the shadow of John F. Kennedy’s famous 1960 speech in which he insisted that neither his faith nor his church would have any influence on his presidency.

Santorum would spend his political life trying to reverse the effects of Kennedy’s pledge. He argued that Kennedy “sealed off informed moral wisdom into a realm of non-rational beliefs that have no legitimate role in political discourse.”

During college and law school at Penn State, Santorum wasn’t especially observant; neither did his religious faith factor much into his political views.

After college he served as an aide to Doyle Corman, a moderate Republican state senator in Pennsylvania. Religion seldom came up.

“My husband and I are both pro-choice,” Corman’s wife, Becky, told The New York Times in 2006. “One of the interesting things about Rick is, the whole time he worked for us, we didn't know what his views were on that issue.”

Dan Santorum says a turning point in his brother’s faith life was his marriage to Karen Garver. They met in the 1980s while Karen was studying law at the University of Pittsburgh and Santorum was recruiting law students for the Pittsburgh firm where he worked.

“There was just a bond between them,” Dan says. “Part of that was that they shared their faith.”

That bond was on display last Tuesday during Santorum’s speech after the Iowa caucuses.

“C.S. Lewis said, ‘A friend is someone who knows the song in your heart and can sing it back to you when you’ve forgotten the words.’ My best friend, my life mate, who sings that song when I forget the words, is my wife, Karen,” Santorum said before embracing her in a long hug.

Santorum bows his head in prayer during an Iowa campaign rally in January.

Sometime after arriving in Washington following his 1990 House victory, Santorum began attending daily Mass before work.

The Rev. Eugene Hemrick, who frequently leads Mass at 130-year-old St. Joseph’s on Capitol Hill, says Santorum led Kansas Gov. Sam Brownback - who served with Santorum in Congress in the 1990s and 2000s - to the church.

“Santorum was always dressed up,” Hemrick remembers. “Brownback was in sweats a lot from running.”

The evangelical Brownback wound up converting to Catholicism, and the two were often joined in the pews by Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas.

“When you know these people are out there, you do a little more homework before you preach,” Hemrick said of his high-profile flock. “You try to make it a little more meaningful to them.”

Moral codes and absolutes

The 1990 GOP freshman class, a small group that managed to win in a poor year for Republicans nationally, took a confident line in airing grievances to congressional and party leaders.

Santorum was part of the freshman “Gang of Seven” that exposed the House banking scandal, and he kept up his penchant for bold, against-the-grain gambits after his election to the Senate as part of the 1994 Republican Revolution.

Soon he was taking aim at the overriding culture-war issue of our time: abortion.

Santorum helped lead the effort to impose the first federal restrictions on abortion that could survive court challenges since Roe. v. Wade - a ban on the procedure critics call partial-birth abortion.

Faith and politics may have been separate in Santorum’s childhood home and the homes of other American Catholics at the time, but by the 1990s abortion had become the symbol for the infusion of conservative faith into American politics. The issue forged a powerful political alliance between conservative Catholics and evangelical Protestants.

On the wall of his Senate office, Santorum kept a picture of William Wilberforce, the British parliamentarian whose evangelical faith stirred him to lead the campaign that ultimately ended the British slave trade in 1807.

The senator saw his campaign for the Partial Birth Abortion Ban Act as his “Wilberforcean effort,” says Rodgers, now a senior adviser to Santorum’s presidential campaign.

Santorum’s comfort with using his faith to shape his politics was partly a reflection of Catholic intellectuals he had met since arriving in the capital, including Richard John Neuhaus, a priest who edited the Catholic journal First Things, and George Wiegel, a theologian.

For Santorum, such figures and books by Catholic writers like St. Augustine instilled the sense that free societies need citizens who are governed by strong moral codes.

“How is it possible, I wonder, to believe in the existence of God yet refuse to express outrage when His moral code is flouted?” Santorum said in a ’90s-era speech at the Heritage Foundation. “To have faith in God, but to reject moral absolutes?”

For Santorum, legalized abortion represented the ultimate flouting of that code.

The Partial Birth Abortion Ban Act passed Congress in 1995, but President Bill Clinton vetoed it the following year. Santorum led a failed Senate effort to override the veto and helped revive the bill after the election of President George W. Bush, who signed it into law.

Such campaigns helped make Santorum a national hero to the anti-abortion movement and a bogeyman for abortion rights supporters.

“On the morning after the Iowa caucuses, there were millions of pro-life voters who woke up pinching themselves that one of their very own had emerged at the top rank of candidates, making sure it wasn’t a dream,” said the Southern Baptist Convention’s Land.

Around the time of the Clinton veto, Rick and Karen Santorum confronted a tragedy that added flesh-and-bone experience to their anti-abortion stance, which had up until then been intellectual and religious.

By that time, the Santorums had three children. While pregnant with her fourth, doctors told Karen her fetus had a fatal birth defect. In his 2005 book “It Takes a Family,” Santorum writes about Karen turning down the option to have an abortion.

“Karen and I couldn’t rationalize how we could treat this little human life at 20 weeks’ gestation in the womb any different than one 20 weeks old after birth,” Santorum writes. “So instead of giving our child a death sentence, we gave him a name: Gabriel Michael, after the two great archangels.”

The premature baby died two hours after birth. The next day, in a move that has widened the public opinion gap over Santorum, he and his wife took the dead body home so their children could spend time with it before burial.

“Gabriel died as a cherished member of our family,” Santorum writes in “It Takes a Family.”

Karen captured the episode in a 1998 book, “Letters to Gabriel,” describing to her late child the reaction of one of his sisters: “Elizabeth proudly announced to everyone as she cuddled you, ‘This is my baby brother, Gabriel; he is an angel.’”

For Santorum, who now has seven kids, holding Gabriel was a lesson about the fragility of human life.

Santorum, wife Karen, and his seven children.

“At that moment, eternity became reality,” Santorum writes. “After Gabriel, being a husband and father was different, being a legislator was different. I was different.”

Conservatism and the common good

Santorum has received a glut of media attention for how his religion shaped his culture-war stances, but allies say his faith has made him a compassionate conservative.

As a senator, Santorum was known for his work on poverty and combating HIV/AIDS. He says such efforts are rooted in the Catholic notion of working for the “common good.”

“Just as original sin is man’s inclination to try to walk alone without God,” Santorum writes in “It Takes a Family,” “individualism is man’s inclination to try to walk alone among his fellows.”

Santorum and those close to him say that impulse motivated his work on welfare reform during the mid-1990s.

Many conservatives “would have taken a fairly harsh view of welfare reform as a waste of taxpayer dollars,” says Rodgers. “Rick’s view was that publicly funded programs are justified when it’s for the least of these, which comes from Catholic social teaching.

“There’s a compassionate side of the Catholic faith that says you prioritize the poor in public policy, and there’s also the side that says work should be a component of that care, that not working strips you of your dignity.”

Santorum championed welfare-to-work programs in the 1996 Welfare Reform Act that Clinton signed, as well as the idea of charitable choice, which gave states the ability to partner with religious institutions to address social problems like poverty and addiction.

Success on welfare reform provoked Santorum and a handful of other religious Republicans in Congress to begin discussing conservative solutions to poverty and other social problems that had mostly been the province of liberals.

Among the participants in those sessions was Gerson, who would join Bush in Texas as a speechwriter in the run-up to his 2000 presidential campaign and bring some of the ideas of the congressional group with him.

One was a plan to start a federal program to help level the playing field for religious groups applying for government money to address social problems.

For Santorum, employing faith groups in such a campaign was partially grounded in the Catholic idea of subsidiarity, which calls for addressing problems closest to where they are. In many troubled communities, the thinking goes, the strongest local institutions are churches, ministries and other religious organizations.

The notion of outsourcing government programs to religious institutions also appealed to Santorum’s beliefs about government’s limits.

“The problems currently afflicting us reflect an impoverishment of the soul more than the pocketbook,” Santorum has said, quoting conservative education scholar Chester Finn. “Government is simply not equipped to address problems of the soul.”

The idea for a government faith-based program had critics on the left and right, who feared government-backed religion and a welfare system for churches.

“A lot of people have a hard time getting Rick Santorum because they’re used to a debate between liberalism and complete free market approach and he’s not either of those things,” says Gerson, now a Washington Post columnist.

Bush created the Office of Faith-Based and Community Partnerships via an executive order days after his 2001 inauguration. Santorum helped organize a conference to tell religious leaders from across the country about the new program.

“It was on that day that I decided to swallow my constitutional concerns about it,” says Richard Land, who attended the conference despite reservations.

“Seventy-five percent of the people attending the conference were either African-American or Hispanic,” Land says. “They wanted people who lived where the problems were making decisions about what should be done. They were in a lifeboat situation.”

Santorum was also a key Bush ally in creating the president's $15 billion global AIDS initiative, with the senator’s staff sometimes lending office space to rock singer Bono while he was lobbying for the program on Capitol Hill.

President Barack Obama has continued support for both the faith-based office and the global AIDS initiative. The programs are evidence that Santorum can be more than a culture warrior, and their staying power suggests he's gone a long way breaking through JFK’s sealed-off wall between religion and politics.

- CNN Belief Blog Co-Editor

Filed under: Catholic Church • Politics • Rick Santorum

soundoff (2,874 Responses)
  1. cynthia hicks

    "separation of church and state" +Santorum. = FAIL

    January 8, 2012 at 9:46 am |
    • warren b eigen

      Agree with you 100 percent. Talk about the real issues, help the President get legislation through the Congress, to help Americans. Stop this bitter hatred of lies of both the Presidnet ,and the First Lady. I have some basic disagreements with the President, but after looking at the offensive clowns running as Republicans-you can know-I will volunteer for the President in Florida , where I live. We cant afford having one of these small-mean minded Republicans to win. We see also the nasty way the majority in the House has hurt the Amkerican people out of their blind hatred of the Presisent–Enough , is enough–The world is watching.

      January 8, 2012 at 10:05 am |
  2. warren b eigen

    The Republican candidates, except maybe Jim Hunstman dont care about the average person- Let them get out of our bedrooms, and help the President , to pass legislation to help us poor slobs, instead of not wanting to raise by a small amount the taxes the very wealthy will pay. I also find it offensive , the amount of hate they show towards the President and the Firs tLady. So disgusted and embarassed.

    January 8, 2012 at 9:46 am |
  3. No one

    I thought marriage was between humans in their eyes.
    Or is there someone named Faith who wants to marry Politics.

    January 8, 2012 at 9:45 am |
  4. Another Catholic

    Matthew 6:5
    "And when you pray, do not be like the hypocrites, for they love to pray standing in the synagogues and on the street corners to be seen by men. I tell you the truth, they have received their reward in full."

    January 8, 2012 at 9:45 am |
  5. john

    So frightening that a scary little man like this, can rise to this level....so closed minded, and narrow of thought and reason.

    January 8, 2012 at 9:45 am |
  6. You can live your life, I will live mine

    Your religion is YOUR moral compass and should guide YOUR actions. It must not guide the laws of the land and be allowed to impose your compass on those of others. How would Rick Santorum feel if a Buddhist was President as passed a law requiring all to be vegetarians because it is thier belief...or a Hindu banning eating beef because cows are sacred. If your releigion...your moral compass tells you abortion is wrong...don't have one (and to their credit he and his family chose not to), teach your children not to...but you cannot mandate that others should not have that choice.

    January 8, 2012 at 9:45 am |
  7. jim atmadison

    Sadly for the Republicans, they abandoned any pretense of wanting to help govern America back toward financial health, and decided that their entire plan for America was "NO!"

    It's not going to turn out well for them in November.

    January 8, 2012 at 9:45 am |
  8. Sashatree

    Santorum......the definition of his name says it all. Goggle it. His rabid and detached from reality religious zeal is ensuring there's no chance of his election. Most Americans aren't this crazy/religious/right wing/disrespectful of women...and of miscarried fetuses. Taking home a deceased baby?!?! Whoa. Red flags, big time.

    January 8, 2012 at 9:45 am |
  9. Muri

    The self-proclaimed religious of the world need to heed their own advice for those they hate. World would be a much better place if folks could just sweep their own doorsteps instead of incessantly needing to judge others.

    Funny word that, judge. Seems to me all you book thumpers were clearly warned about said activity. Judge not lest ye be....oh to hell with it. You don't really do what your supposed to anyway....bunch of cafeteria followers defending a dogma you don't even really follow. It's quite entertaining to watch safely from the outside.

    January 8, 2012 at 9:45 am |
  10. stjdsj

    Know this first of all, that in the last days mockers will come with their mocking, following after their own lusts, and saying, “Where is the promise of His coming? For ever since the fathers fell asleep, all continues just as it was from the beginning of creation.”
    For when they maintain this, it escapes their notice that by the word of God the heavens existed long ago and the earth was formed out of water and by water, through which the world at that time was destroyed, being flooded with water. But by His word the present heavens and earth are being reserved for fire, kept for the day of judgment and destruction of ungodly men. (2Peter 3:3-7)

    January 8, 2012 at 9:45 am |
    • Sashatree

      You have every right to believe this stuff. But keep it to yourself. The rest of us aren't interested.

      January 8, 2012 at 9:47 am |
    • jim atmadison

      That still doesn't give Santorum a right to impose his religious beliefs on the populace under a secular government.

      Christ made a very strong point of staying away from the tumultuous political issues of His day.

      His version of the First Amendment (that we not impose a state religion), was that we render to Ceasar that which is Caesar's and to God that which is God's.

      January 8, 2012 at 9:52 am |
  11. jim atmadison

    Funny thing is, the only electables in the GOP prez race are the Mormons.

    And the rightwing Evangelicals prefer somebody like Santorum, who wants to impose Christian Sharia law on America.

    January 8, 2012 at 9:43 am |
  12. Gumby

    If Richard Land is for something then so is Ralph Reed, then I start to smell a stench and realize all that bunch, Santorum included,want an American Theocracy where then can take our money and ram their beliefs into law. Much like Iran.

    January 8, 2012 at 9:43 am |
  13. Ted 2313

    I believe in freedom of religion – but not to push your religion down my throat. Ever heard of separation of church and state? When you start incorporating your religious views on how the government is run, it becomes a mess of "my way or the highway and you're unpatriotic if you don't agree". This country was formed with a religious base that most people supported – look at our currency. But the extremist religious views, on both sides, interfere with the norm. Creationism is just not scientificly proven but the religious right want to impose it in schools. Conservatives want govt out of their lives (except of course when they receive grants, subsidies, SS or VA benefits, or when a tornado destroys their home) so why are they in the bedrooms of 2 people who love each other? If it doesn't affect you, leave it alone. All these people who thank God in every other sentence should perhaps keep their views to themselves instead of trying to appear so holier than though just to get votes.

    January 8, 2012 at 9:42 am |
  14. Knucklehead

    Santorum's a true Christian. That's why he gave away all his riches and is now following Jesus and helping the poor 24/7.

    January 8, 2012 at 9:42 am |
    • achepotle

      hahahahaha...so true..."sell all your possessions, give your money to the poor and follow me." But that's so haaaaaard! How about spew ignorance, cut taxes to the rich, hate on gays and pray for war with Iran instead? Lucky for him, about 1/2 of Americans seem equally cruel, stupid and unconnected to the real Jesus, so he may do well!

      January 8, 2012 at 9:46 am |
    • warren b eigen

      I am so offended as a Jewish, Gay Man, who is in a relationship almost 13 years with these Republicans. First this is not a Christian nation-millions of us who are of many religions, or none at all. Tired of no tbeing recognized as an American who is Jewish , and Gay. Lets talk of inclusion, not exclusion. Lets talk about helping the American people, instead of worrying the wealthy will pay a bit more to help the average working slob. When I grew up in New York, the Republicans worked with the Democrats many times to get legislation through to help the average voter. Talk is cheap these days–The Birther Movement-the insults to the President and the First Lady-Stop already–The world is watching and laughing. Stop the nonsense of what we can or canot do , in our private lives.

      January 8, 2012 at 9:57 am |
  15. Dan

    Wow. I just read about him on wikipedia and this is one disturbing guy and I usually vote republican.

    January 8, 2012 at 9:41 am |
  16. Nord Jim

    Wait - there's a picture of Jesus? Who knew?

    January 8, 2012 at 9:40 am |
  17. Devilnoch

    I have no problem with a person living their faith as they see fit. I see nothing wrong with that person talking about their faith. What I have a problem with is someone using their faith to legislate rights and freedoms that they feel others may or may not have. Hey Ricky, why don't you just update the Malleus Maleficarum to include gays. You could make them all wear pink triangles on their clothing so we "normal" people know who to persecute. Then you could round them up and make them live in segregation camps with all the other heretics and deviants. Yeah, I can see why your name is Dick.

    January 8, 2012 at 9:40 am |
    • Knucklehead

      All that comes after the election...probably won't get ramped up until his second term...

      January 8, 2012 at 9:44 am |
  18. MK54

    Santorum's 15 minutes must be over by now. Why are we still talking about this strange and dangerous man as a viable candidate for President?

    January 8, 2012 at 9:40 am |
    • Knucklehead

      Because Cain, Bachmann, Perry, and Gingrich have all flamed out and there's nobody else left. Paul might get a turn, but I doubt it. He's not Godly enough (Newt must be the exception).

      January 8, 2012 at 9:46 am |
  19. TownC

    What candidate does not want to say who can get married, what women can do with their bodies, and what will be taught in schools? They all do; including President Obama. The key is to have a free and open debate not to resort to name calling and scare tactics. There is too much anger and hatred out there. Fear breeds anger and hate.

    January 8, 2012 at 9:40 am |
    • Knucklehead

      So when the Right screams "Socialism," we should just calmly shake our heads? Look how the Right dealt with the so-called Health Care debate, taking over meetings and screaming over the top of people so they couldn't have their say. The result is that they won, because they were louder. The left is tired of being run over and called names. The Right started this with their nasty rhetoric.

      It's only going to get worse.

      January 8, 2012 at 9:50 am |
  20. bajadelmar

    Xian facism at its finest by Ricky "Man on Dog" inSantorum.

    January 8, 2012 at 9:39 am |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53
Advertisement
About this blog

The CNN Belief Blog covers the faith angles of the day's biggest stories, from breaking news to politics to entertainment, fostering a global conversation about the role of religion and belief in readers' lives. It's edited by CNN's Daniel Burke with contributions from Eric Marrapodi and CNN's worldwide news gathering team.