home
RSS
January 7th, 2012
10:00 PM ET

Reversing JFK: Santorum’s bid to marry faith and politics

Editor’s note: This is part of an occasional series of stories looking at the faith of the leading 2012 presidential candidates, including Mitt Romney, Rick Perry and Newt Gingrich. We also profiled the faith journey of Herman Cain before he suspended his campaign.

By Dan Gilgoff and Eric Marrapodi, CNN Belief Blog Co-Editors

(CNN) - It was election night in November 2006, and Rick Santorum had organized a private Catholic Mass in a room at the Omni William Penn Hotel in Pittsburgh. The senator from Pennsylvania had just lost his re-election bid.

The Mass, held just before his concession speech, included a priest and Santorum’s close family and staff. Though the occasion was somber, the soon-to-be-ex-senator aimed for a celebratory mood, said Mark Rodgers, then a top Santorum aide.

“Life is if full of what can be perceived as disappointments or hardships,” Rodgers said, “but Scripture tells followers of Jesus that we approach those situations with joy because there’s ultimate redemption.”

Santorum’s younger brother, Dan, remembers that many attendees - including the senator’s children - were weeping over Santorum’s landslide defeat at the hands of Democrat Bob Casey Jr.

But not the senator.

“You’d think he would have been crushed,” says Dan Santorum. “But he wasn’t even bitter. He didn’t complain. He just said it was God’s plan.

“That’s when I knew he was going to run for president of the United States,” Dan continued. “Because I think that God had another plan for him.”

It’s unclear if Rick Santorum, whose strong finish in the Iowa caucuses has breathed new life into his presidential campaign, interpreted his Senate loss the same way.

Santorum concedes his Senate seat in 2006.

But the hotel Mass, and Santorum’s apparent placidity in the face of an overwhelming defeat, illustrate what confidants say is the key to understanding him as a person and politician: a devout Catholic faith that has deepened dramatically through political and personal battles.

“When I first met him he was an observant Catholic but a fairly privatized one,” says Rodgers, who ran Santorum’s first race for the U.S. House in 1990 and served as a key Santorum aide in Congress for 16 years.

“The journey I saw him on was a gradual awakening to the importance of faith at an operational level within a democracy, the idea that free people need to have a moral foundation.

“The journey was also personal - growing in faith and sharing it with others,” Rodgers says.

Many politicians have ideological concerns about issues like abortion or gay marriage, but “in Santorum’s case, it’s fundamentally religious,” says Richard Land, public policy chief at the Southern Baptist Convention. “That’s the genetic code of his life.”

It’s also the part that most inspires his political backers - among them the Iowa evangelicals who helped fuel his stunning Iowa finish, eight votes behind winner Mitt Romney - and most enrages critics, who take deep offense at Santorum’s views on divisive issues like homosexuality, which he once lumped together with bestiality in a discussion of legal rights.

“I think it’s fair to say that he’s sometimes harsh in the way he makes those arguments,” says Michael Gerson, a speechwriter for former President George W. Bush.

Indeed, even Santorum’s own party is seeing a faith-based split around his presidential campaign, with evangelicals who dominate the primaries in states like Iowa on one side and more establishment Republicans in states like New Hampshire on the other.

As he works to convince skeptical voters he has a real shot at winning the White House, Santorum’s religious faith has emerged as both his chief political asset and his biggest liability.

Kennedy's ‘sealed off’ wall

His Catholicism may have deepened as an adult, but Santorum also has deep Catholic roots.

“Three pictures hung in the home of my devoutly Catholic immigrant grandparents when I was a boy,” he said in a speech last year. “I remember them well: Jesus, Pope Paul VI and John F. Kennedy.”

Santorum attended Mass with his brother, sister and parents virtually every Sunday. “You basically had to be on your deathbed not to go to church,” says Dan Santorum.

Both parents worked in a VA hospital in Butler, Pennsylvania. As teenagers, Rick and Dan would push the wheelchairs of patients to Sunday Mass in the hospital’s interfaith chapel. Rick would serve the Mass as an altar boy, wheel patients up to receive Holy Communion, then help his brother wheel them back to their hospital rooms.

Other than that, it was a conventional American Catholic upbringing in the 1960s and ’70s: The Santorums said grace before meals, sent their kids to Catholic grade school and spent absolutely no time discussing how religion influenced their public policy views.

American Catholics at the time were living in the shadow of John F. Kennedy’s famous 1960 speech in which he insisted that neither his faith nor his church would have any influence on his presidency.

Santorum would spend his political life trying to reverse the effects of Kennedy’s pledge. He argued that Kennedy “sealed off informed moral wisdom into a realm of non-rational beliefs that have no legitimate role in political discourse.”

During college and law school at Penn State, Santorum wasn’t especially observant; neither did his religious faith factor much into his political views.

After college he served as an aide to Doyle Corman, a moderate Republican state senator in Pennsylvania. Religion seldom came up.

“My husband and I are both pro-choice,” Corman’s wife, Becky, told The New York Times in 2006. “One of the interesting things about Rick is, the whole time he worked for us, we didn't know what his views were on that issue.”

Dan Santorum says a turning point in his brother’s faith life was his marriage to Karen Garver. They met in the 1980s while Karen was studying law at the University of Pittsburgh and Santorum was recruiting law students for the Pittsburgh firm where he worked.

“There was just a bond between them,” Dan says. “Part of that was that they shared their faith.”

That bond was on display last Tuesday during Santorum’s speech after the Iowa caucuses.

“C.S. Lewis said, ‘A friend is someone who knows the song in your heart and can sing it back to you when you’ve forgotten the words.’ My best friend, my life mate, who sings that song when I forget the words, is my wife, Karen,” Santorum said before embracing her in a long hug.

Santorum bows his head in prayer during an Iowa campaign rally in January.

Sometime after arriving in Washington following his 1990 House victory, Santorum began attending daily Mass before work.

The Rev. Eugene Hemrick, who frequently leads Mass at 130-year-old St. Joseph’s on Capitol Hill, says Santorum led Kansas Gov. Sam Brownback - who served with Santorum in Congress in the 1990s and 2000s - to the church.

“Santorum was always dressed up,” Hemrick remembers. “Brownback was in sweats a lot from running.”

The evangelical Brownback wound up converting to Catholicism, and the two were often joined in the pews by Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas.

“When you know these people are out there, you do a little more homework before you preach,” Hemrick said of his high-profile flock. “You try to make it a little more meaningful to them.”

Moral codes and absolutes

The 1990 GOP freshman class, a small group that managed to win in a poor year for Republicans nationally, took a confident line in airing grievances to congressional and party leaders.

Santorum was part of the freshman “Gang of Seven” that exposed the House banking scandal, and he kept up his penchant for bold, against-the-grain gambits after his election to the Senate as part of the 1994 Republican Revolution.

Soon he was taking aim at the overriding culture-war issue of our time: abortion.

Santorum helped lead the effort to impose the first federal restrictions on abortion that could survive court challenges since Roe. v. Wade - a ban on the procedure critics call partial-birth abortion.

Faith and politics may have been separate in Santorum’s childhood home and the homes of other American Catholics at the time, but by the 1990s abortion had become the symbol for the infusion of conservative faith into American politics. The issue forged a powerful political alliance between conservative Catholics and evangelical Protestants.

On the wall of his Senate office, Santorum kept a picture of William Wilberforce, the British parliamentarian whose evangelical faith stirred him to lead the campaign that ultimately ended the British slave trade in 1807.

The senator saw his campaign for the Partial Birth Abortion Ban Act as his “Wilberforcean effort,” says Rodgers, now a senior adviser to Santorum’s presidential campaign.

Santorum’s comfort with using his faith to shape his politics was partly a reflection of Catholic intellectuals he had met since arriving in the capital, including Richard John Neuhaus, a priest who edited the Catholic journal First Things, and George Wiegel, a theologian.

For Santorum, such figures and books by Catholic writers like St. Augustine instilled the sense that free societies need citizens who are governed by strong moral codes.

“How is it possible, I wonder, to believe in the existence of God yet refuse to express outrage when His moral code is flouted?” Santorum said in a ’90s-era speech at the Heritage Foundation. “To have faith in God, but to reject moral absolutes?”

For Santorum, legalized abortion represented the ultimate flouting of that code.

The Partial Birth Abortion Ban Act passed Congress in 1995, but President Bill Clinton vetoed it the following year. Santorum led a failed Senate effort to override the veto and helped revive the bill after the election of President George W. Bush, who signed it into law.

Such campaigns helped make Santorum a national hero to the anti-abortion movement and a bogeyman for abortion rights supporters.

“On the morning after the Iowa caucuses, there were millions of pro-life voters who woke up pinching themselves that one of their very own had emerged at the top rank of candidates, making sure it wasn’t a dream,” said the Southern Baptist Convention’s Land.

Around the time of the Clinton veto, Rick and Karen Santorum confronted a tragedy that added flesh-and-bone experience to their anti-abortion stance, which had up until then been intellectual and religious.

By that time, the Santorums had three children. While pregnant with her fourth, doctors told Karen her fetus had a fatal birth defect. In his 2005 book “It Takes a Family,” Santorum writes about Karen turning down the option to have an abortion.

“Karen and I couldn’t rationalize how we could treat this little human life at 20 weeks’ gestation in the womb any different than one 20 weeks old after birth,” Santorum writes. “So instead of giving our child a death sentence, we gave him a name: Gabriel Michael, after the two great archangels.”

The premature baby died two hours after birth. The next day, in a move that has widened the public opinion gap over Santorum, he and his wife took the dead body home so their children could spend time with it before burial.

“Gabriel died as a cherished member of our family,” Santorum writes in “It Takes a Family.”

Karen captured the episode in a 1998 book, “Letters to Gabriel,” describing to her late child the reaction of one of his sisters: “Elizabeth proudly announced to everyone as she cuddled you, ‘This is my baby brother, Gabriel; he is an angel.’”

For Santorum, who now has seven kids, holding Gabriel was a lesson about the fragility of human life.

Santorum, wife Karen, and his seven children.

“At that moment, eternity became reality,” Santorum writes. “After Gabriel, being a husband and father was different, being a legislator was different. I was different.”

Conservatism and the common good

Santorum has received a glut of media attention for how his religion shaped his culture-war stances, but allies say his faith has made him a compassionate conservative.

As a senator, Santorum was known for his work on poverty and combating HIV/AIDS. He says such efforts are rooted in the Catholic notion of working for the “common good.”

“Just as original sin is man’s inclination to try to walk alone without God,” Santorum writes in “It Takes a Family,” “individualism is man’s inclination to try to walk alone among his fellows.”

Santorum and those close to him say that impulse motivated his work on welfare reform during the mid-1990s.

Many conservatives “would have taken a fairly harsh view of welfare reform as a waste of taxpayer dollars,” says Rodgers. “Rick’s view was that publicly funded programs are justified when it’s for the least of these, which comes from Catholic social teaching.

“There’s a compassionate side of the Catholic faith that says you prioritize the poor in public policy, and there’s also the side that says work should be a component of that care, that not working strips you of your dignity.”

Santorum championed welfare-to-work programs in the 1996 Welfare Reform Act that Clinton signed, as well as the idea of charitable choice, which gave states the ability to partner with religious institutions to address social problems like poverty and addiction.

Success on welfare reform provoked Santorum and a handful of other religious Republicans in Congress to begin discussing conservative solutions to poverty and other social problems that had mostly been the province of liberals.

Among the participants in those sessions was Gerson, who would join Bush in Texas as a speechwriter in the run-up to his 2000 presidential campaign and bring some of the ideas of the congressional group with him.

One was a plan to start a federal program to help level the playing field for religious groups applying for government money to address social problems.

For Santorum, employing faith groups in such a campaign was partially grounded in the Catholic idea of subsidiarity, which calls for addressing problems closest to where they are. In many troubled communities, the thinking goes, the strongest local institutions are churches, ministries and other religious organizations.

The notion of outsourcing government programs to religious institutions also appealed to Santorum’s beliefs about government’s limits.

“The problems currently afflicting us reflect an impoverishment of the soul more than the pocketbook,” Santorum has said, quoting conservative education scholar Chester Finn. “Government is simply not equipped to address problems of the soul.”

The idea for a government faith-based program had critics on the left and right, who feared government-backed religion and a welfare system for churches.

“A lot of people have a hard time getting Rick Santorum because they’re used to a debate between liberalism and complete free market approach and he’s not either of those things,” says Gerson, now a Washington Post columnist.

Bush created the Office of Faith-Based and Community Partnerships via an executive order days after his 2001 inauguration. Santorum helped organize a conference to tell religious leaders from across the country about the new program.

“It was on that day that I decided to swallow my constitutional concerns about it,” says Richard Land, who attended the conference despite reservations.

“Seventy-five percent of the people attending the conference were either African-American or Hispanic,” Land says. “They wanted people who lived where the problems were making decisions about what should be done. They were in a lifeboat situation.”

Santorum was also a key Bush ally in creating the president's $15 billion global AIDS initiative, with the senator’s staff sometimes lending office space to rock singer Bono while he was lobbying for the program on Capitol Hill.

President Barack Obama has continued support for both the faith-based office and the global AIDS initiative. The programs are evidence that Santorum can be more than a culture warrior, and their staying power suggests he's gone a long way breaking through JFK’s sealed-off wall between religion and politics.

- CNN Belief Blog Co-Editor

Filed under: Catholic Church • Politics • Rick Santorum

soundoff (2,874 Responses)
  1. tony

    The complete disproof of the "power" of any "god" is the unquestionable existence of "collection plates" for them.

    January 8, 2012 at 10:56 am |
    • Gene

      Not really. There is no corelation.

      January 8, 2012 at 11:07 am |
    • cigarlover6

      really ren? if you wont pay, how would your 'xian religion spread in the whole world?? by magic?

      January 8, 2012 at 11:11 am |
  2. stjdsj

    "There is a judge for the one who rejects Me and does not accept My words; that very word which I spoke will condemn him at the last day." John 12:48

    January 8, 2012 at 10:56 am |
    • tony

      sticks and stones will break my bones, but others imagination will never hurt me, no matter how violent their threats are intended to be.

      January 8, 2012 at 10:58 am |
    • MMM

      Isn't that special! Thank you Church Lady.

      January 8, 2012 at 11:03 am |
    • cigarlover6

      Oh my! what a tool, the smart guys who wrote those false edicts, knew how fools could be controlled with it.. man... what a waste of human intelligence!

      January 8, 2012 at 11:13 am |
    • Santorum is nuts

      Fear... One of the many sales pitches included of the bible.

      January 8, 2012 at 11:24 am |
  3. nd

    Initially, Santorum scared the life out of me. I am vehemently opposed to his platform at every level. However, Santorum is very good for the Democrats. I hope he gets the Rep. ticket – it guarantees a lights-out win for Obama as only a small minority of Americans will vote for such a nut.

    January 8, 2012 at 10:55 am |
  4. BIll

    Why should we elect anyone who believes in such fantasy? Still waiting for a true hero to stand up and say he does not believe in magic, invisible beings and a life after this one. That is who I would vote for.

    January 8, 2012 at 10:55 am |
  5. Reality

    Dear Ricky S,

    Again, we are still waiting for your reply:

    Obviously, you suffer from the Three B Syndrome i.e. Bred, Born and Brainwashed in religion and in your case, Catholicism so again we say a prayer on your behalf. Please read carefully and repeat every time you think everything is some god's plan:

    The Apostles' Creed 2011: (updated by yours truly and based on the studies of historians and theologians of the past 200 years)

    Should I believe in a god whose existence cannot be proven
    and said god if he/she/it exists resides in an unproven,
    human-created, spirit state of bliss called heaven??

    I believe there was a 1st century CE, Jewish, simple,
    preacher-man who was conceived by a Jewish carpenter
    named Joseph living in Nazareth and born of a young Jewish
    girl named Mary. (Some say he was a mamzer.)

    Jesus was summarily crucified for being a temple rabble-rouser by
    the Roman troops in Jerusalem serving under Pontius Pilate,

    He was buried in an unmarked grave and still lies
    a-mouldering in the ground somewhere outside of
    Jerusalem.

    Said Jesus' story was embellished and "mythicized" by
    many semi-fiction writers. A descent into Hell, a bodily resurrection
    and ascension stories were promulgated to compete with the
    Caesar myths. Said stories were so popular that they
    grew into a religion known today as Catholicism/Christianity
    and featuring dark-age, daily wine to blood and bread to body rituals
    called the eucharistic sacrifice of the non-atoning Jesus.

    Amen

    January 8, 2012 at 10:55 am |
  6. Jeff

    What is the big deal? None of those will win over Obama anyway. Why waste money and time?

    January 8, 2012 at 10:53 am |
  7. Jim

    Santorum lost his Senate seat in Pennsylvania in 2006 by a vote of 59% to 41%. Nearly 20% difference.

    Pennsylvanian's had 12 years to get to know him. American, please learn from Pennsylvania's mistake.

    January 8, 2012 at 10:53 am |
  8. Back To The Cave

    *** 4mercy

    The only thing that will save American from being overrun by terrorists or being bombed off the face of the earth is the protection we receive from God.

    Funny how that works, they are trying to kill us because of "thier" god.

    January 8, 2012 at 10:50 am |
    • SafeJourney

      "Their God"(muslim ) is the God of Abraham. Didn't know that, did ya?

      January 8, 2012 at 10:56 am |
  9. Main Man

    So when you induce birth at 20 weeks to a fetus w/birth defects you've essentially given it a death sentence. A completely healthy fetus would have extremely tough odds at that stage. Seems pretty obvious that he and his wife had a "partial birth abortion" to me.

    What a hypocrite.

    January 8, 2012 at 10:50 am |
    • MMM

      That's a very astute observation! I didn't know that they deliberately induced the birth. Wow!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

      January 8, 2012 at 11:23 am |
  10. Sarah

    Let's face it, politicians can no longer attempt to curry favor from one single religious group anymore without it being a liability. You have to appeal to all Americans, who low and behold, might be different.

    January 8, 2012 at 10:50 am |
  11. Charlie from the North

    The most polite way I can put this is: Some people are best at "public" life and some are best at "private" life. Rick Sanatorium is clearly better suited to "private life" and the sooner the voters return him to it, the better.

    January 8, 2012 at 10:49 am |
    • cigarlover6

      well said Charlie

      January 8, 2012 at 11:03 am |
  12. Jim

    What make Santorum's beliefs "right" when billions of people in other countries and other religions say he's wrong?

    January 8, 2012 at 10:49 am |
  13. Jvance

    Though non-religious myself, I believe that most religions are highly effective in establishing sound and consistent moral foundations. Only when there are efforts to enforce religion-specific doctrine into secular law do they become perniciously destabilizing. oppressive and potentially evil. Not only are there different religions in our society but there are many different flavors of Christrianity. How different a theocracy we would have under a fervent Roman Catholic as opposed to one headed by zealous Southern Baptist (let's not even think about an Appalachian snake handler).
    We want (and must have) leaders who are fundamentally good and the tenets of Christianity provide a firm foundation for that character. But always keep in mind this caveat: an individual can be pure but governments and statesmen must be responsible. When leaders take on the responsibility for establishing the laws of a diverse culture such as ours they should by all means bring religious moral principles to work with them, but perhaps leave the details at home.

    January 8, 2012 at 10:47 am |
    • Bob

      How are the senseless animal sacrifice and the ra.pe of family members that the Christian bible says god commands, plus threats of eternal torture that Christianity offers, a basis for a good moral foundation? They aren't.

      Ask the questions. Break the chains. Be free of religion in 2012.
      http://whywontgodhealamputees.com/

      January 8, 2012 at 10:50 am |
    • Sarah

      Backwoods Americans want to drop bombs on those who want Sharia Law, but will turn around and demand the very same type of system here in America. Hypocrites.

      January 8, 2012 at 10:52 am |
    • Rainer Braendlein

      @Jvance

      You mean it well, but your system will not work.

      Why?

      In order to be able to keep the Christian tenets, you must be delivered. Without deliverance there is not Christian life.

      How to get deliverance?

      Jesus has borne our sins, when he died for us on the cross. Believe that and get baptized (but no re-baptism) and you become able to keep the commandments of Jesus Christ, which can be summarized in one word: LOVE.

      January 8, 2012 at 10:54 am |
    • PEB

      Obviously Bob was dropped as a small child and lives in a dream world

      January 8, 2012 at 11:00 am |
    • PEB

      Sara, when was the last time a Catholic flew a plane into a building in the name of God? Thinking that only people in " backwoods America" are the ones that think that Sharia law makes you seem like such an imbecile. If Sharia law takes place in America – you Sara would be wearing a burqaa – guaranteed!

      January 8, 2012 at 11:05 am |
  14. Dina

    Nothing more frightening than a leader who thinks that we should all live by his personal moral code. In addition, he answers to a man in Italy that most of us think is just some guy in a funny suit.

    January 8, 2012 at 10:46 am |
    • Bob

      Dina, well said. And that criminal in the funny suit has actively worked to hide some pretty nasty priests from justice.

      January 8, 2012 at 10:52 am |
    • PEB

      Dina, Are you so naive to think that your party's leaders are worried about what you think? Each leader – Including Obama is guided by what he thinks is important not by what we think is. How could you be so foolish as to think that?

      January 8, 2012 at 10:57 am |
    • PEB

      and bob

      January 8, 2012 at 10:58 am |
    • PEB

      And let us not forget that the OLD and I do mean old, speaker of the house Nancy (I need to iron my face) Pelosi was Catholic (well not really Catholic just pretend Catholic the way you like your leaders)

      January 8, 2012 at 11:07 am |
  15. John/kc

    Making all forms of birth control illegal! Is this guy for real? Will we have condom and birth control pill smugglers along with dope smugglers?

    January 8, 2012 at 10:45 am |
  16. Rainer Braendlein

    It is impossible to unite papacy and the true gospel of Jesus Christ. Nobody would try to unite hell and heaven.

    "It was election night in November 2006, and Rick Santorum had organized a private Catholic Mass in a room at the Omni William Penn Hotel in Pittsburgh."

    Like many politicans of today Mr. Santorum has no sufficient knowledge of history or is just ignorant. Obviously he doesn't know or he ignores that the great Protestant Reformer and theologian of the last century, Dietrich Bonhoeffer, has condemned papacy. He equtated papacy with the rule of the pseudo-church (Reichskirche), which cooperated with the Nazis during the Third Reich.

    You can check this in Volume 14 of the DietrichBonhoefferWerke (DBW) “Illegale Theologenausbildung in Finkenwalde 1935-1937″, Bonhoeffer’s Aufsatz über Kirchengemeinschaft:

    Open page 677 and 678 of the volume, because there you can read the following:

    What if, if in a single congregation of the Roman Church or of the Reichskirche (Nazi-Church) the gospel would be preached purely? Isn’t there then the true church too? (Answer:) There is no pure preaching of the gospel independent from the whole Church. Even if someone would preach the gospel in purity like the apostle Paul and he would be obedient to the pope or the Reichskirchenregierung (Nazi-Church), he would be a heretic and seducer of the congregation.”

    Mr. Santorum should forsake the wicked pope and become a Protestant, then God would bless him.

    January 8, 2012 at 10:44 am |
    • wizjinx

      Your brand of protestant fantasy is merely a derivative of the Catholic brand you mock. As is Islam, for that matter, making all of the fantasy world believers of the same ilk. Fitting.

      January 8, 2012 at 11:27 am |
  17. tony

    I don't think there has ever been a "catholic" civilization.

    January 8, 2012 at 10:44 am |
    • Bob

      Indeed. "catholic" and "civilization" are contradi-ctions in terms.

      Ask the questions. Break the chains. Be free of religion in 2012.
      http://whywontgodhealamputees.com/

      January 8, 2012 at 10:47 am |
    • MacDav

      Two athiests, believe that they are just monkey dropping and they actually can think.

      January 8, 2012 at 10:58 am |
    • Tom, Tom, the Piper's Son

      Says Mac, who is unable to write a simple sentence without screwing up the punctuation.

      January 8, 2012 at 11:07 am |
    • bnb42

      MacDav:
      Fine... I evolved... You didn't

      January 8, 2012 at 11:10 am |
  18. Francis

    Very scary ! VERY! All this religion/faith contradictions and arguments, justifications and food for the ignorant! Please keep these modern "Savonarolas" out of government.

    " THE GREATEST ENEMY OF KNOWLEDGE IS NOT IGNORANCE... !
    IT IS THE ILLUSION OF KNOWLEDGE...

    January 8, 2012 at 10:44 am |
    • KB

      I like that quote, do you know who originated it?

      January 8, 2012 at 12:33 pm |
    • KB

      I just looked it up Stephen Hawking. Very cool

      January 8, 2012 at 12:40 pm |
  19. stjdsj

    Jesus said, "But I say, if you are even angry with someone, you are subject to judgment! If you call someone an idiot, you are in danger of being brought before the court. And if you curse someone, you are in danger of the fires of hell." Matthew 5:22

    January 8, 2012 at 10:43 am |
    • tony

      Jesus also supposedly said rich filk would not be allowed to enter heaven. So why are these religious nuts trying to make so may of their friends rich???

      January 8, 2012 at 10:47 am |
    • bnb42

      Wife listed among property

      Thou shalt not covet thy neighbour's house, thou shalt not covet thy neighbour's wife, nor his manservant, nor his maidservant, nor his ox, nor his ass, nor any thing that is thy neighbour's.
      - Exodus 20:17 (AV), The Tenth Commandment

      January 8, 2012 at 10:48 am |
    • bnb42

      Beatings don't kill kids

      Withhold not correction from the child: for if thou beatest him with the rod [sceptre], he shall not die.
      - Proverbs 23:13 (AV)

      January 8, 2012 at 10:49 am |
  20. cigarlover6

    What a nut job this guy is!! 7 children !! This 'xian fundamentalist is no better than those 'slam fanatics who produces innumerable children and those paranoid folks who home school their children in order to "protect" them from differing world views?. Imagine if everyone started having 7 children, what will this world would become with its scarce resources? Its like loser breeding losers.
    This is what wrong with America, that narrow mindedness and dogma based society would pull everyone down. I am so highly surprised that even after knowing his dogma oriented "conservative (read fanatic)" values, he is surging 😦

    January 8, 2012 at 10:42 am |
    • SafeJourney

      Santorum is just the flavor of the week. Just like all the other GOP candidates. The GOP/TP is still looking for thier non-Mitt candidate.

      January 8, 2012 at 10:47 am |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53
Advertisement
About this blog

The CNN Belief Blog covers the faith angles of the day's biggest stories, from breaking news to politics to entertainment, fostering a global conversation about the role of religion and belief in readers' lives. It's edited by CNN's Daniel Burke with contributions from Eric Marrapodi and CNN's worldwide news gathering team.