CNN Photos: Inside MLK's newly renovated church
Inside Atlanta's Ebenezer Baptist Church.
January 16th, 2012
09:05 AM ET

CNN Photos: Inside MLK's newly renovated church

Martin Luther King Jr. was born just blocks east of Ebenezer Baptist Church in downtown Atlanta, where he joined his father as co-pastor in 1960. Were he still alive, he would have turned 83 on Sunday. For the first time on this national holiday, Ebenezer church visitors will be enjoying the newly renovated landmark.

View more pictures of Ebenezer Baptist Church at CNN Photos.
- CNN Belief Blog

Filed under: Christianity • Church

soundoff (23 Responses)
  1. Glenna Smigel

    Hamburgers are usually a feature of fast food restaurants. The hamburgers served in major fast food establishments are usually mass-produced in factories and frozen for delivery to the site. These hamburgers are thin and of uniform thickness, differing from the traditional American hamburger prepared in homes and conventional restaurants, which is thicker and prepared by hand from ground beef. .

    Check out all of the most popular piece of writing at our new website

    April 26, 2013 at 11:46 pm |
  2. Marleenh Tappez

    One more thing that I desire to share at this place is that, whatever you are using free blogging service except if you donit update your weblog on regularly basis then itis no more worth.

    July 6, 2012 at 4:17 pm |
  3. Sediapearly

    check this link, coach tote handbags at my estore new coach purses at my estore

    February 7, 2012 at 4:25 am |
  4. Atheism is not healthy for children and other living things

    Prayer changes things

    January 16, 2012 at 7:53 pm |
    • The Central Scrutinizer

      Thank you sir may I have another.

      January 16, 2012 at 8:05 pm |
    • Atheism is not healthy for children and other living things

      Prayer changes lives
      Prayer is free but obtained at an inestimable cost
      Prayer is available to everyone
      A prayer of great power
      God help
      Prayer changes lives

      January 16, 2012 at 8:28 pm |
    • The Central Scrutinizer

      Prayer helps me pray

      January 16, 2012 at 8:35 pm |
    • Ungodly Discipline

      This isn't working.

      January 16, 2012 at 10:03 pm |
    • Merde

      Oh, youre quick.

      January 17, 2012 at 1:44 am |
  5. The Central Scrutinizer

    1. Why did Matthew include four women in Joseph's genealogy?
    Matthew mentions four women in the Joseph's genealogy.
    a. Tamar – disguised herself as a harlot to seduce Judah, her father-in-law (Genesis 38:12-19).
    b. Rahab – was a harlot who lived in the city of Jericho in Canaan (Joshua 2:1).
    c. Ruth – at her mother-in-law Naomi's request, she came secretly to where Boaz was sleeping and spent the night with him. Later Ruth and Boaz were married (Ruth 3:1-14).
    d. Bathsheba – became pregnant by King David while she was still married to Uriah (2 Samuel 11:2-5).
    To have women mentioned in a genealogy is very unusual. That all four of the women mentioned are guilty of some sort of s.e.xual impropriety cannot be a coincidence. Why would Matthew mention these, and only these, women? The only reason that makes any sense is that Joseph, rather than the Holy Spirit, impregnated Mary prior to their getting married, and that this was known by others who argued that because of this Jesus could not be the Messiah. By mentioning these women in the genealogy Matthew is in effect saying, "The Messiah, who must be a descendant of King David, will have at least four "loose women" in his genealogy, so what difference does one more make?"

    In Matthew, the angel appears to Joseph in a dream and tells him that Mary's child will save his people from their sins. In Luke, the angel tells Mary that her son will be great, he will be called the Son of the Most High and will rule on David's throne forever. A short time later Mary tells Elizabeth that all generations will consider her (Mary) blessed because of the child that will be born to her.
    If this were true, Mary and Joseph should have had the highest regard for their son. Instead, we read in Mark 3:20-21 that Jesus' family tried to take custody of him because they thought he had lost his mind. And later, in Mark 6:4-6 Jesus complained that he received no honor among his own relatives and his own household.

    January 16, 2012 at 1:53 pm |
    • llɐq ʎʞɔnq

      Good points, but....
      re #1, it doesn't really matter, because at the end of Matthew 1, he says, (on the Maurey Show no less), Joseph was NOT the father. Although it DOES give one pause, wondering why the ENTIRE chapter is wasted on the genealogy, only to have it denied in the end.
      re #2, the examination of those verses in Matthew, (which were a quotation from Isaiah), is a bit more interesting, historically speaking.
      Background :
      Isaiah 7 talks about the history of King Ahaz, son of Jotham, the son of Uzziah, who was king of Judah. At the time, King Rezin of Aram and Pekah, son of Remaliah, King of Israel, marched up to fight against Jerusalem, and the campaign was long and protracted. See the Syro-Ephraimite War, (Wikipedia : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Syro-Ephraimite_War ), and it happened in the 8th Century (734) BC. When Ahaz was loosing faith, Isaiah went to visit him, and told him to "buck up", keep the faith, and continue the war, and told him that the SIGN from god, that they were favored, was that one of his wives, (a "woman of marriageable age") would be found to be with child. The SIGN was the CHILD, (and NOT the manner of the birth). ...."And they shall name him Emmanuel" which means "god is with us". The CHILD was the SIGN.

      Any devout Jew in the time of the Roman occupation, (around 60 AD), would know that story, from Isaiah, and when they heard the words "a woman, (of marriageable age) will be found to be with child" they would connect the stories in their brains, and recognize that the gospel text's intention was to remind them of the Isaiah story, and would "harken" back to it, and realize the intent of the author was to claim that THIS child also was a sign. The general intent of the Gospel of Matthew was to claim the fulfillment of the various prophesies regarding the messiah, and this one was another one of those claims/stories of fulfillment.
      BTW, the word "virgin" is a mistranslation, of a translation. So WE have a translation, of a mis-translation, of a translation. Matthew, writing in Greek about the "virgin birth" of Jesus, quotes the Septuagint text of Isaiah 7:14-16, which uses the Greek word "παρθένος" (parthenos,), (we still use the term "parthenogenesis") while the original Hebrew text has "עלמה" (almah), which has the slightly wider meaning of an unmarried, betrothed,or newly wed woman such as in the case of Ahaz' betrothed Abijah, daughter of Zechariah. He NEVER meant to imply that he was asserting "gynecological" claims, and THAT whole business was "off-the-wall", a mistranslation, taken to ridiculous extremes, by interpreters who missed the point. THE CHILD was the sign.

      Also interesting that Matthew (1:25) only says that Joseph "knew her not till she brought forth her firstborn son". It does NOT say she REMAINED a virgin.

      See also : Mother Goddess, ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mother_goddess ) and Joseph Campbell, ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goddess ) and Courtly Love, ( http://cla.calpoly.edu/~dschwart/engl513...ourtly.htm ). The business of Mary, and her idealized state, was extremely important in the civilization/culture of the West, and in some circles remains very important today, (Lourdes & Fatima and claims of "Marian" apparitions" etc., etc.)

      Class dismissed. 😈

      January 16, 2012 at 6:58 pm |
    • Ironicus

      Good grief I want my money back!!

      January 16, 2012 at 8:02 pm |
    • The Central Scrutinizer

      Well, since I have neither the energy nor the desire to verify alll of that and don't really care and because it is all nonsense anyway, you win bucky. You kknow bucky, I fella comes in here, tries to irritate VanHagar a little, have a few laughs and some damn devil ball be sucking all the fun out of it. Man, guess I will watch the Lakers and have a cold frosty. I might be late for your next class, but that is only because the bullies are beating me up in the bathroom and taking my lunch money again.

      January 16, 2012 at 8:12 pm |
  6. tea party

    Colombian Mondongo tastes and smells much better than chitlns

    January 16, 2012 at 12:52 pm |
  7. Ironicus

    That choir loft looks like a perfect place to have s.ex.

    January 16, 2012 at 11:19 am |
    • Merde

      They should take out the chairs and make it a master bedroom. Then they could say "OH GOD" and it would feel great. 😀

      January 17, 2012 at 12:15 am |
  8. AlnC

    To those who love truth, we offer a different understanding. Our understanding is not based on media reports but on the Word of God. People are outraged when they hear our message even though this country is founded on freedom of religion and freedom of speech. Why do people get angry when somebody presents their belief? Check out our website http://www.Hear-The-Truth.com

    January 16, 2012 at 10:44 am |
    • Prayer Cures Cancer And Ends Birth Defects

      Spam, spam, spam, spam
      spam, spam, spam, spam
      Send us cash, 'cause we're Christians
      Praise Jesus by giving us cash

      January 16, 2012 at 12:17 pm |
    • Merde


      Just believe us 'cause we're Christians
      Praise Jesus by giving us cash
      It doesn't matter if we're lying
      cause we f,ck you in the ass

      January 17, 2012 at 1:46 am |
  9. hamburger steak

    Too bad it smells like chitlins

    January 16, 2012 at 9:47 am |
    • Ironicus

      Not being from the South, I actually had to look up "chitlins"
      ...all I can say is hungry people will eat almost anything if given half a chance.

      January 16, 2012 at 11:55 am |
  10. John


    January 16, 2012 at 9:15 am |
    • ....

      TROLL Alert – don't bother viewing this garbage, click the report abuse link to get rid of this TROLL!

      January 19, 2012 at 5:48 pm |
About this blog

The CNN Belief Blog covers the faith angles of the day's biggest stories, from breaking news to politics to entertainment, fostering a global conversation about the role of religion and belief in readers' lives. It's edited by CNN's Daniel Burke with contributions from Eric Marrapodi and CNN's worldwide news gathering team.