Can Mitt Romney’s evangelical ambassador seal the deal before Election Day?
Mark DeMoss and Mitt Romney at Liberty University, where Romney delivered the commencement address in May.
September 1st, 2012
10:00 PM ET

Can Mitt Romney’s evangelical ambassador seal the deal before Election Day?

By Dan Gilgoff, CNN.com Religion Editor

Tampa, Florida (CNN) – The task of selling a Mormon presidential candidate to evangelical America has fallen to a public relations man who’s not even getting paid for what may be the toughest sales job of his career.

For six years, Mark DeMoss has served as Mitt Romney’s unofficial evangelical ambassador, making the case that born-again Christians should help elect the first Mormon to the White House.

It has often been a lonely job.

During this year’s primaries, DeMoss found himself addressing audiences of evangelical leaders in which nearly everyone was rooting for another candidate: Rick Santorum, Newt Gingrich, Rick Perry – anybody but Romney.

“It would have been tough for anyone other than Mark,” says Richard Land, the public policy chief for the Southern Baptist Convention, remembering how DeMoss performed in one hostile setting last January. “The audience was stacked for Santorum and Gingrich.

“But he has a lot of street cred with evangelicals,” Land says of DeMoss. “He understands us because he’s one of us. So he did great.”

CNN Explains: What’s Mormonism?

Now that Romney has outlasted the other candidates to become the Republican nominee for president, DeMoss is using that street cred to help the candidate close the deal with evangelical voters in the weeks before Election Day.

It’s unclear whether he will succeed.

Polls show that although most evangelicals have come around to Romney, there’s a sizable chunk who have not. With those voters making up a huge part of the GOP base in swing states like Ohio, Iowa and Virginia, whether DeMoss’ gambit works could mean the difference between an Obama or a Romney White House.

For DeMoss, who is officially a senior adviser to the Romney campaign, the stakes of his work go well beyond electoral politics. He’s trying to open the American evangelical mind.

“I took this on to tackle prejudicial attitudes,” DeMoss says, explaining how he approached Romney about running for president in 2006, convinced that the then-Massachusetts governor was the most qualified man for the presidency that he’d ever seen.

How Mormonism shaped Mitt Romney

“I discussed it with Romney the first time we met,” he continues, sitting in his room at the elegant Vinoy Resort and Golf Club in St. Petersburg, his home during the convention. “It bothered me that some evangelicals said they couldn’t support a Mormon for president. As a public relations guy, I wanted to change that mindset.”

Which is why DeMoss was in front of the North Carolina delegation at the convention Monday morning, arguing that it’s unfair for some Republicans to insist on a presidential nominee with whom they agree about everything.

“My advice to those folks is perhaps you should run yourself the next time,” DeMoss told the evangelical-heavy delegation in a Hilton Hotel ballroom, still abuzz about a powerhouse speech that New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie had delivered a few minutes earlier.

“My wife and I have been married for 24 years,” DeMoss said, “and I don’t agree with her on everything.”

Looking professorial in tortoiseshell glasses, a blue blazer and a white polo shirt tucked into khakis, DeMoss never mentioned religion or Romney’s Mormonism.

But you could tell it was a big part of what he was talking about.

It’s why he told the delegation that he has prayed with Mitt Romney and shared scripture with him and has even sought parenting advice from Romney and his wife, Ann.

After years of traveling and visiting with the Romney, DeMoss told the crowd, “I trust his values - for I’m fully convinced they mirror my own.”

It might not sound like much, but an evangelical Christian vouching for a Mormon’s values in front of ballroom full of fellow believers can be a powerful thing.

At least that’s the hope.

Lessons from the Moral Majority

DeMoss developed an appreciation for Mormons from a somewhat unlikely source: the evangelical giant Jerry Falwell.

He enrolled at Liberty University, Falwell’s school, in 1980, the year after his father died of a heart attack. Falwell, a fundamentalist preacher, would become like a second father.

DeMoss’s dad had been friends with Falwell – DeMoss says it’s unclear if the insurance marketing company his father founded, National Liberty Corp., helped give Liberty University its name – and Mark found work in Falwell’s office after graduation.

By the time he was 23, DeMoss was serving as Falwell’s chief of staff and spokesman, helping his boss run a growing evangelical empire that included the Lynchburg, Virginia, university and a new organization Falwell had helped found: the Moral Majority.

The organization aimed to bring evangelicals back into the political fold, after millions of them had spent decades sitting out elections, convinced that politics were a dirty, ungodly business.

“We traveled the country, challenging pastors to get involved. He outworked staff  that were half his age” DeMoss says of Falwell, who died at 73 in 2007.

Mark DeMoss with Jerry Falwell at 1992 Republican Convention in San Diego, California.

Falwell taught him how political organizing works, from the grassroots to the very top. He took him to meetings with President Ronald Reagan, whom the Moral Majority had helped elect, and President George H.W. Bush.

Among the most important lessons Falwell taught, DeMoss says, is that politics is the art of the possible.

“You’d be hard-pressed to find someone who was more politically conservative than Falwell, but he became increasingly pragmatic,” DeMoss says, eating blueberries from a plastic cup in his hotel room. “He was more practical and open-minded than a lot of people saw.”

As he waged crusades against abortion and for prayer in schools, Falwell proudly linked arms with non-evangelicals. While others in the burgeoning Christian Right wanted to organize only among their own flocks, the Moral Majority chief pushed an idea called co-belligerency: people of different religious backgrounds setting aside theological differences to pursue common political goals.

CNN’s Belief Blog: The faith angles behind the biggest stories

“A lot of people forget this or didn’t know it to begin with, but the Moral Majority was a coalition of evangelicals, Catholics, Jews and Mormons,” DeMoss says. “It was not an evangelical organization.”

Mormons consider themselves to be Christians, but some evangelicals and other traditional Christians disagree. While Mormons treat the Bible as Scripture, they also consider the Book of Mormon to be a holy book

There are other big differences between Mormonism and traditional Christianity, including the Mormon belief that the modern prophets of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints can receive revelations from God. Traditional Christians believe that the period for such revelations is over.

But Falwell’s insistence on coalition building with Mormons and others stuck with DeMoss long after he left the Lynchburg in 1991 to start his own Christian PR firm in Atlanta.

Follow the CNN Belief Blog on Twitter

The firm, called the DeMoss Group, took Falwell as its first client and quickly added business from big Christian groups like Chuck Colson’s Prison Ministries, Franklin Graham’s Samaritan’s Purse and Christian Crusade for Christ.

More than 20 years later, those groups are still with DeMoss.

“What makes Mark different than a lot other guys in this business is that he’s independently wealthy,” says Graham, who notes that DeMoss’ wife, April, is also from a family that started an insurance company.

“I find him to shoot straight because he’s not trying to keep my business,” Graham says. “I think he’s more concerned with trying to be honest. He will bill you and then at the same time he’ll make a big contribution back to you.”

Mark DeMoss with the Rev. Franklin Graham, a client since 1991.

Though DeMoss has kept his work for Romney, which is unpaid, separate from the DeMoss Group, the relationships he built over decades through his PR work are key to selling Romney to evangelical leaders.

Graham had never met Romney before DeMoss arranged for 15 conservative Christian leaders to visit Romney’s Massachusetts home in 2007, when he was preparing to make his first run for president.

As the leaders took turns introducing themselves, many volunteered that they had traveled to Romney’s home mostly because DeMoss had asked them.

By the end of the meeting, Romney had made some new friends.

“Sometimes on TV someone can appear one way but when you meet them face to face you see the personal side of him,” says Graham, recalling the meeting. “After I met Governor Romney I liked him very much and even more l liked his wife and his marriage and his commitment to family.”

As for theological issues that interested some of the evangelicals, Graham says Romney “answered those questions extremely well.”

Since then, DeMoss has helped evangelical leaders not only become more comfortable with the idea of a Mormon in the White House but also with Romney’s evolving position on issues like gay marriage and abortion.

“He’s absolutely trusted as a pro-life person,” Land says of DeMoss. “When he says Governor Romney is pro-life, that means something. That helps.”

Land is among the many evangelical leaders who use DeMoss to relay concerns or advice to the governor.

“Mark’s a trusted negotiator,” says Land, who had dinner with Romney and DeMoss last year.

Though Romney’s 2008 campaign was unsuccessful, DeMoss counted it as a victory that no major evangelical figure came out against him over his faith, even if few publicly endorsed his campaign.

Four years later, there still aren’t many prominent evangelicals who’ve come out publicly for Romney.

And there are questions about where Romney stands with rank-and-file evangelicals. A recent Pew poll found that, while most white evangelicals support Romney, a quarter are uncomfortable with his religion. Just one in five in that group are strongly pro-Romney.

Ten weeks before Election Day, it’s not where a Republican nominee wants a key part of his base to be.

Visiting Salt Lake

DeMoss’ case for why evangelicals can enthusiastically support a Mormon candidate echo Falwell’s arguments about why evangelicals and Mormons should be political allies.

It goes like this: If evangelicals are OK with seeing a Mormon doctor or flying with a Mormon pilot, DeMoss reasons, shouldn’t they be OK with a Mormon president? We’re electing a commander-in-chief, not a pastor-in-chief, right?

Plus, fixing the national economy – the No.1 issue in this election – doesn’t really have anything to do with religion.

In fact, DeMoss was drawn to Romney because of the candidate’s unusual breadth of experience as a businessman, governor and Olympics Committee chief with dual degrees from Harvard.

“On a personal level and a spiritual level, I might care a great deal about what somebody believes doctrinally,” he tells NPR during a phone interview from his room at the Vinroy. “In the case of presidential election, I don’t care.”

After hanging up, DeMoss stays on that point: “I hope I’ve shifted a conversation about the religion of a candidate to one about the values of a candidate.”

DeMoss says that voting on the basis of a candidate’s faith is dangerous and inane. He notes that three of the most successful politicians from his own denomination, the Southern Baptist Convention, are all Democrats whom many evangelical loathe: Jimmy Carter, Bill Clinton and Al Gore.

Since January, DeMoss has spent about half his time making such arguments, stressing to clients that the work is not official firm business. Still, he suspects that some potential clients have skipped signing up with the DeMoss Group because its founder and president is pushing a Mormon candidate.

April, his wife, who’s checking her iPhone on the bed of DeMoss’ hotel room, says they’ve lost a few friends over Romney, too. But they’ve also made new Mormons friends, and have developed a deep appreciation for the Mormon faith.

On the van to the hotel to address the North Carolina delegation, Mark and April trade stories with their Mormon driver, a convention staffer, about their respective visits to Salt Lake City, where the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints is headquartered.

Later, DeMoss talks about being turned off by the evangelical street preachers he’d seen on the street corners there, preaching to Mormons in town for the church’s annual general assembly. How could such evangelizers hope to convert anybody in the 30 or so seconds it takes to wait for the light to change?

For DeMoss, the episode represents a civility deficit when it comes to the evangelical treatment of Mormons. He sees his work with Romney partly as a corrective.

Whether DeMoss can help soften the evangelical line toward Mormons is an open question. So is whether he can get enough of his brethren to go a giant step further and vote for a Mormon for president.

- CNN Belief Blog Co-Editor

Filed under: 2012 Election • Christianity • Mitt Romney • Mormonism • Politics

soundoff (1,426 Responses)
  1. Ofended

    Romney's defeat will have nothing to do with his Mormonism, it will be because the Republican Party has gone too far to the right and is so under the control of big money.
    Like the interest rates on your credit card? Thank the Republicans.

    September 2, 2012 at 10:50 am |
  2. mormoncandidate dot com

    His Mormonism is the most important part of this election, isn't it?

    September 2, 2012 at 10:47 am |
  3. master5hake

    This just in Mitt has won the Trekkie vote due to his beliefs of interstellar space travel and aliens. On another note he is now going after the Zombie/Vampire vote by baptizing the dead.

    September 2, 2012 at 10:46 am |
  4. marinedad05

    Romney is actually (still) trying to sell Mormonism to his Conservative base. If his base has't taken to Mormonism in these last so many decades, I doubt, if they will fall in line in a few weeks.

    Liberals are more open to this, but they ain't voting for Romney.

    September 2, 2012 at 10:45 am |
  5. zoyster1

    If voters cared that much about a president's faith they wouldn't have elected a Muslim. This is a red herring, non-issue ploy for the liberal media.

    September 2, 2012 at 10:45 am |
    • peter

      I don't vote for mormons or muslims–it's not a red herring for me

      September 2, 2012 at 10:50 am |
  6. JimmyAlex777

    Romney and that dude in the first picture that we clicked to get to this story look cool as gay lovers about to kiss passionately.

    September 2, 2012 at 10:45 am |
  7. us_1776

    Hey Mitt, seriously man, what's the deal with all this Mormon k_i d d i e s_e x stuff?

    You know, some people don't take too kindly to that kind of stuff.

    September 2, 2012 at 10:42 am |
  8. TheBob

    Only Obama can unite Christians and Mormons.

    September 2, 2012 at 10:41 am |
  9. 1914

    What throws me away is that presidential candidates claim to be religious people but in the other hand they are willing to become the Commanders in Chief of one of the most powerful military of history, something that Christ never did or planned to do. For me none of them really understand religion or Christ teachings. They are serving two Masters, been disloyal at the end to Christ as he indicated. This direct and open involvement of religion with politics will bring consequences to them, so, the fall and destruction of false religion by the same ones they are now flirting with is near.

    September 2, 2012 at 10:41 am |
    • edweird69

      Isn't Christ and his army supposed to like... come back, conquer the antichrist, and rule the world? It all confuses the he11 outta me.. hehehhe

      September 2, 2012 at 10:45 am |
  10. GoldenChild

    My dad says we had to run them out of Missouri and we can run them out of Washington if we have to.

    September 2, 2012 at 10:41 am |
  11. Ralph M

    Electing someone , or not electing them because of their religion shows a kind of mindlessness. I mean, either they understand the issues and have a viable plan to address them or not. Either they are in touch with the American people or not. Neither candidate seems to have a complete grasp on reality as we have heard a lot about the negative aspects of them, but not a whole lot of the positive.
    And the use of the term "street cred" in this story made me laugh.

    September 2, 2012 at 10:40 am |
  12. us_1776

    Hey Mitt, seriously man, what's the deal with all this baptizing the dead of other religions?

    You know, some people don't take too kindly to that kind of stuff.

    September 2, 2012 at 10:40 am |
  13. Jetty

    What matters is that Romney has No Core. He would do anything say anything to get elected. After that, POFITEERING and The Middleclass would be the order of Romney's White House.

    September 2, 2012 at 10:39 am |
  14. Simon

    seal the deal? hes going to lose who are we kidding

    September 2, 2012 at 10:39 am |
  15. Swearengen

    Religion has no place in politics (or public society) in the 21st century. Religion is not morality (Look at the crusades, the inquisition, or the witch trials – real honest to goodness morality there – I tell you) Talking to yourself does not effect your life or the lives of those around you. Ghosts are simply not real. Grow up.

    September 2, 2012 at 10:39 am |
    • Larry

      It never did. According to the founding fathers. They said things like "that this government is in no way founded on the christian religion"

      September 3, 2012 at 7:25 am |
  16. us_1776

    Hey Mitt, seriously man, what's the deal with all this polygamy stuff?

    You know, some people don't take too kindly to that kind of stuff.


    September 2, 2012 at 10:36 am |
  17. spockmonster

    anyone who believes in religion should not be eligible for President. We need sane leaders, not "believers".

    September 2, 2012 at 10:36 am |
    • Ralph M

      Organized religion is for the weak and infirm. And a cash cow for snake oil salesmen.

      September 2, 2012 at 10:42 am |
  18. us_1776

    Hey Mitt, seriously man, can you explain this Planet-Sun Golob thing?

    So which is it? A planet. Or a sun?

    And who's this Space Alien that lives there?


    September 2, 2012 at 10:35 am |
  19. Christian


    September 2, 2012 at 10:35 am |
    • El Flaco

      He's just not a Christian. You point of view is that any religion is better than no religion?

      September 2, 2012 at 10:37 am |
    • peter

      It has nothing to do with obumo. The book of mormon is not the word of God –it is blasphemy. This republican will be sitting out the gen election

      September 2, 2012 at 10:38 am |
  20. marco w.

    Do you all remember when the Mormons tried to convert dead Jews so that they could go to heaven?

    Well, don't forget it!

    September 2, 2012 at 10:35 am |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29
About this blog

The CNN Belief Blog covers the faith angles of the day's biggest stories, from breaking news to politics to entertainment, fostering a global conversation about the role of religion and belief in readers' lives. It's edited by CNN's Daniel Burke with contributions from Eric Marrapodi and CNN's worldwide news gathering team.